2024 Fisker Ocean Sport 22in

2024 Fisker Ocean Sport 22in

Electric SUV · FWD

194 mi 100 kWh NMC CCS1 200 kW DC 4 recalls 0 complaints · 0/10K
55 /100
TrimIndex Score

Based on battery health, build quality, owner data, EPA range, and market pricing

Below average for 2024 EV SUVs (class avg 66)

Personalize this score
Is a low score bad?
Not always. A low score flags items to verify before buying — and often signals stronger value, since heavier discounts already price the risk in. See TrimIndex’s pre-purchase inspection →
Sourced from: NHTSA· EPA· KBB· J.D. Power ·4 Reddit threads ·18 forum excerpts

Last scanned 22 days ago

Buyer brief · 242 words

The 2024 Fisker Ocean Sport 22in packs 194 miles of EPA range, 200 kW fast charging and a 100 kWh battery, and plan around the short range and check that home and route charging cover daily use.

Score read

A 55/100 makes this discount-only territory. Build quality score is 76/100, but range and efficiency score is only 17/100. Reddit threads cluster around range and owner satisfaction — verify both against the service records. Treat missing repair records as a price problem, not a footnote.

Price context

Bring your own comps Pull current comps before negotiating

Used examples are running around $11,700. Treat that as a budgeting floor, not a final price; pull a current KBB Fair Purchase or Edmunds True Market Value for this exact trim before negotiating.

Who this is for

✓ Good for

  • Daily commuter ≤50 mi/day, predictable charging

✗ Avoid if you are a

  • Family hauler 3+ kids, cargo, towing
  • Road tripper Long trips, needs DC fast network
  • $
    Bargain hunter Best TCO, reliability + low depreciation

Gotchas

  • Serviceable Recall paperwork has to match the exact VIN.

    Mitigation Use NHTSA and the automaker lookup, then require repair records instead of a verbal promise.

  • Built in Range is the easy place to overbuy this trim (17/100).

    Mitigation Check your commute, winter margin, and fast-charge plan before you assume the EPA number fits your use.

Pre-purchase inspection

  • 1 Run the exact VIN through NHTSA and the automaker recall lookup before discussing price.
  • 2 Compare the dashboard range estimate with the EPA 194-mile rating after a full charge.
  • 3 Confirm how much of the 8-year/100,000-mile battery warranty remains and whether it transfers.
  • 4 If road trips matter, run a short DC fast-charge session and watch whether speed tapers normally.
  • 5 Map your normal highway route and winter margin against the EPA range before you treat it as a road-trip car.
TrimIndex Intelligence
Synthesized 9 days ago
0 NHTSA Complaints 0 per 10K VINs · low for any vehicle class
4 Recall Campaigns
4 Reddit Threads r/Fisker
18 Forum Excerpts avg -0.36 sentiment

VIN status first This model has 4 NHTSA recall records. The exact VIN lookup decides whether the car in front of you is clear.

Complaint context This scan found 0 NHTSA complaint records (0 per 10K VINs, low for any vehicle class). Read the themes below before treating the raw count as the verdict.

Price anchor Current market range is $11,700-$11,700. Use that range to compare listings for the same trim, mileage, and condition.

Analyzed by TrimIndex Data Engine · Scoring methodology →

Pricing & Market Value

Original MSRP Exact sticker unavailable
Current Market Value $11,700 – $11,700 Composite from KBB & J.D. Power
Exact MSRP comparison unavailable
KBB
Fair Purchase Price
J.D. Power
Consumer Verified™

Score Breakdown

What matters most to you?

Drag the sliders to prioritize what you care about. Your TrimIndex Score recalculates instantly.

Your Score
55
/100
Battery Health
72
Weight29%
Owner Satisfaction
41
Weight24%
Build Quality
76
Weight18%
Range & Efficiency
17
Weight18%
Software & Tech
71
Weight11%

Vehicle Specifications

194
miles
EPA Range
100
kWh
Battery
42.7
kWh/100mi
Efficiency
FWD
 
Drivetrain
Peers in the same budget · higher or similar score

EVs at your price point that match or beat this trim

Price-gated peer set: vehicles within $9.4K–$14.0K market value (±20% of $11.7K). 0 outscore · 0 score within ±2. Mixed across makes — no "spend more, score better" comps.

0
Peers in price band

No EVs in TrimIndex's database currently trade within ±20% of $11.7K with a score equal to or higher than this trim. Check back as our coverage expands, or see the full make / model index for broader comparisons.

Used-EV incentive finder

The federal $4,000 used-EV credit ended Sept 30, 2025.

But 10 states still run their own used-EV rebate programs — some up to $5,000. Pick your state to see what's available for this trim.

Source & disclaimer
SourceData compiled April 2026 from each state's administering agency.
DisclaimerProgram rules change. TrimIndex is not a tax advisor — confirm eligibility with your state's issuing agency before purchase.
The Financing Room · What Actually Happens

Dealers make ~$5,705 on the average car loan.

After the price is set, the finance manager runs four plays to rebuild margin. Every buyer without a pre-approval is a target. Here's exactly what they run — and what stops each one.

01 · Without pre-approval
+$393
Rate markup

78% of dealer loans carry a hidden +1.13% markup above what the lender actually charges. You never see it — it's buried in the contract. · CFPB

With pre-approval ↓
Rate is already locked

Dealer must match or beat your lender — they can't add margin invisibly. The markup play is dead on arrival.

02 · Without pre-approval
+$1,800
"What's your monthly budget?"

Once you answer, they stretch the term to hit your number. Median result: $4K less off the price, 12 more months on the loan. · Industry avg

With pre-approval ↓
One number to negotiate

Financing is done. Only the sale price is on the table — and the dealer knows it.

03 · Without pre-approval
+$1,775
GAP + extended warranty upsell

Back-office F&I profit averages $1,975/vehicle, up 8.5% YoY. These products exist — but dealer markup is 4–10x what you'd pay elsewhere. · Dealership Guy

With pre-approval ↓
You can shop it or skip it

Dealer GAP runs $500–1K. Your insurer sells the same coverage for $100–250 over 5 years. Now you know.

04 · Without pre-approval
+$1,737
Yo-yo / spot delivery

"Your loan fell through — come re-sign." This pulls your APR up +5% on average. It's legal. It works because you've already driven the car home. · Ctr for Responsible Lending

With pre-approval ↓
Financing already closed

A lender commitment letter means the deal is final. "Pending dealer approval" doesn't apply. You can't be yo-yo'd.

You overpay
~$5,705

That's 33 months of your car payment — handed to the dealer's finance department for nothing.

Your cost to get pre-approved
$0

Takes 2 minutes. No obligation to use it — but you'll walk in with all the leverage.

Lock your rate before you go to the lot.
Soft pull only No SSN required Works at any dealer

Pre-approval is a soft credit inquiry — no score impact. FICO treats all auto-loan hard pulls within 14 days as one, so you can still shop rates at the dealer.

NHTSA Recalls (4)

Invalid Date
Service Brakes, Electric — Software — Programming
Campaign #24V623000

Fisker Group Inc (Fisker) is recalling certain 2023-2024 Ocean vehicles. The brake module software may cause an unexpected reduction in regenerative braking, decreasing the braking performance.

Decreased braking performance can extend the distance required to stop, increasing the risk of a crash.

Check VIN status at NHTSA.gov
Invalid Date
Structure — Body — Door — Handle — Exterior
Campaign #24V466000

Fisker Group Inc (Fisker) is recalling all 2023-2024 Ocean vehicles. The exterior door handles can stick and fail to open.

A door that fails to open can prevent occupants from exiting in an emergency, increasing the risk of injury.

Check VIN status at NHTSA.gov
Invalid Date
Service Brakes, Hydraulic; Autohold Brake System — Brake Hold — Software
Campaign #24V865000

Fisker Group Inc (Fisker) is recalling certain 2023-2024 Ocean vehicles. The transmission may not shift into the selected gear, allowing the vehicle to roll away while in Drive or Reverse.

A vehicle roll away increases the risk of a crash or injury.

Check VIN status at NHTSA.gov
Feb 2024
Electrical System — Propulsion System — Traction Battery — Management System — Energy Control Module (Bms — Becm)
Campaign #24V499000

Fisker Group Inc (Fisker) is recalling all 2023-2024 Ocean vehicles. A communication failure with the cabin electric water pump can cause the high voltage battery management system (BMS) to enter limp mode, causing a loss of drive power.

A sudden loss of drive power increases the risk of a crash.

Check VIN status at NHTSA.gov

NHTSA Complaints (0 total · 0 per 10K US vehicles · low for any vehicle class)

0
NHTSA Complaints

No complaints filed with NHTSA for this vehicle.

What Owners Are Saying

▲ +0.60Satisfaction

"Thinking About Buying a Fisker Ocean? 2026 Update # Thinking About Buying a Fisker Ocean in 2026? **First question: Is the Fisker Ocean a good car?** The honest answer in 2026 is still: **Yes — and No.** # The Yes # 1. It’s Still a Great-Driving EV While early reviews from outlets like Edmunds and U.S. News & World Report praised the Ocean’s strong performance, attractive design, comfortable ride and “California Mode” (all windows and roof open at once), the bankruptcy of Fisker Inc. and many negative reviews in 2024 created a challenging reputation for the car. The mood has decidedly changed since then. Recent articles from Wired Magazine and uploads from YouTuber Rich Rebuilds and Everything Electric Cars are examples of this positive shift. Thousands of owners who drive them daily still report comfortable seats, an excellent driving experience, solid highway performance, and real-world range that holds up well. For the money they are selling for in 2026, the performance-per-dollar ratio is extremely compelling. The Ocean remains one of the most distinctive EVs on the road. # 2. The Manufacturers Behind the Ocean are Still in Business While Fisker Inc. ceased operations, the Ocean was actually manufactured by **Magna Steyr**, a highly established Austrian automaker that also builds vehicles for BMW, Mercedes, and others. Mechanically, many components are robust. The drivetrain and core EV architecture are generally not the weak point. Another company involved in the manufacturing of the vehicle is **Chevalier**, who created and still supports components such as the door handles, Phone as Key Controller, and more. # 3. The 2026 Ecosystem Is Stronger Than Ever Before This is where 2026 buyers have a major advantage over early adopters. Parts availability is quite good now, contrary to popular belief. * In the U.S., **Tsunami Automotive** supplies many commonly needed components. In the EU, **Tidal Wave** fills a similar role. * Other options include Salvage Surfers, eBay, Errons, Fisker Ocean Parts (UK), Electrified Ocean, and more. While not dealership-level logistics, the parts situation is *far better than the early bankruptcy uncertainty period.* **Software & Updates** The Ocean’s software stability in 2026 is a dramatically improved experience compared to the software provided at launch. * **OV Loop** provides software updates and internet connectivity for owners w"

— r/Fisker · 2026
▲ +0.50Range

"Fisker Ocean One driving range and cost My first pass at figuring out real world range and cost to home charge FOO. I do not have daily losses as other have reported. I'm on the latest OTA 1.09. Tires are at 44PSI front, 49PSI rear. I've done 2 charges so far with my Tesla Universal Charger. I'm trying to confirm some numbers like stated battery size and usable capacity. 116KWh and 106.5Kwh usable is what I've found. My last charge was from 69% to 81% that added 43 miles of range. Tesla app claims I used 15.6KWh. It was claiming a 7.0KWh charge rate through most of it. The car dash was reading about 6.2KWh. I will assume this is losses in charging which equals about 88% eff. If we trust the EPA range of 360, then 43/360=15.6\*(6.2/7.0)/capacity. Capacity equals 116KWh. Obviously we probably have some rounding errors with charge percentage, miles added and efficiency losses . So I will need to keep repeating these tests to see where it ends up. I forgot to get the actual mileage driven from the car, but that is another sore subject with me as to why it isn't always showing in the gauge cluster., but buried as a second page on the charge screen. Plus no trip odometer yet. I drove from my house straight to the airport and back. Google lists it as 34.2 miles round trip for the route I took. It was mixed driving with city, highway and lights, 60 mins round trip. A couple of quick passes. Who can resist? My range to empty dropped 42 miles. I Started at 80% charge, so my 15.6KWh was for charging to 81%, which means I used 14.3KWh (11/12\*15.6KWh) for the trip. Looks like 2.4miles/KWh (From grid with losses). So with these numbers 34.2/42\*360 equals a real world range of 293 miles at moderate temperatures. Cool day in Phoenix with temps about 76 at drive time. A/C was on and California mode was used for the last 20% of the trip. I'm with SRP and cost with taxes and fees is about $0.10/KWh. Thats 24 miles/dollar. A gallon of gas in my area is about $4.00 so equivalent of 96MPG. I hope I did these calculations right. Anyone else crunch some numbers yet? ​"

— r/Fisker · 2026
▽ 0.80Satisfaction

"Fisker Ocean review: Stylish EV or risky gamble? Fresh from the design board of Henrik Fisker, the Fisker Ocean blends eye-catching style with eco-friendly ideas like a solar roof and recycled materials. It’s a mid-size electric SUV that turned heads with its 17″ rotating touchscreen and “California Mode,” where all the windows drop for a convertible feel. What stands out driving is comfort and that quirky personality. The ride is smooth, the surf‑inspired interior feels mature, more luxurious than a Model Y, with suede seats and physical buttons for climate control. The solar roof can add around 1,000 miles per year, a neat bonus. On performance, it has solid acceleration, 0–60 mph in roughly 4 seconds for the Extreme model and a range between 230 mi and 440 mi, depending on trim and battery size. However, it hasn’t been smooth sailing behind the scenes. Fisker’s bankruptcy in mid‑2024 halted production, froze software updates, and drastically cut resale values, I’ve seen examples lose up to 80% value in a year. Owners report software bugs, glitchy infotainment, odd braking behavior, and even safety recalls tied to power loss . One owner called it a “rough” ownership experience even while praising its design. Pros: It looks and feels premium, offers strong acceleration, a generous real-world range, solar roof perks, and a fun, laid‑back cabin vibe. Cons: Software and electronics lack polish, warranty and future support are uncertain after bankruptcy, resale value took a nosedive, and driving dynamics, like braking and cornering, are uneven compared to rivals. If you’re after a head-turner EV with smart features and don’t mind taking a risk on its future support and value, the Ocean can deliver a fun ride. But it clearly has growing pains and financial risks attached. So, would love to hear from the community, have you driven or bought a Fisker Ocean? Did you find its design and features worth the gamble, or did the issues push you away?"

— r/productreview · 2026
▽ 0.80Satisfaction

"Fisker Ocean vs Kia EV6 Anybody have direct experience with both vehicles mentioned in the title, and if so, could you offer a comparison? The Ocean has more range on paper, but I've seen some dismal real-world accounts of Ocean range on this sub, and the 230 miles Car and Driver got out of the EV6 at 75mph on the highway seems pretty reasonable. So, range aside: how do these two compare in your experience? Asking for a friend. For my part: I have an Ocean Ultra reservation, and it's currently "At US Port". It was originally predicted to be "At Facility" as soon as Jan 08, 2024... but that just got revised to Jan. 14, 2024 yesterday afternoon. I've been trying for over a month to get somebody at Fisker Inc to respond to repeated inquiries about taking advantage of the promotional 1.99% interest rate (I got approval for a loan on Oct. 28, but the 45 day window for that offer has been up for a while), and after many lapsed "somebody will get back to you within 48 hours"es from Fisker New Vehicle Delivery, automated Radgiver suggestions that I contact Fisker Finance, insistence from *Fisker Finance* that it was *Fisker Inc* that needed to reset my profile so I could reapply... and that they (Fisker Finance) would "escalate" my request with Fisker Inc (3 times)... along with a couple completely unacknowledged emails to my VA... I finally got somebody from "New Vehicle Delivery" (Fisker "Sales" has not ever answered one of my calls, in spite of being on hold for over an hour on one occasion) to humor me and try to go outside their lane and help me figure this out (to their credit). They responded with an email the next day telling me my vehicle was scheduled to arrive at the vehicle processing center on Jan. 10, 2024, and that I had to wait until it was there to apply for financing (even though I had already applied once and gotten approval on Oct. 28, 2023). He offered that I could call on Jan. 9 and see if it got there early? I logged onto my Fisker account an hour later and my estimated arrival at facility was now Jan. 14. Anyway, that's all beside the point. My friend is between a Fisker Ocean and a Kia EV6, and it seems like he could even use the Wallbox charger I... I mean he... already purchased and installed.... for... reasons. He even saw a couple used EV6s with \~25,000 miles for \~$36,000 that could take the sting out of a lost $250 reservation fee, $1,000 deposit for "firm order status", and maybe-possible-backdated $7,500 Federal EV credit. Ya know, if he had paid those.... which he didn't, of course. So, again, for those of you who've had the opportunity to own, or maybe even just drive both the EV6 and Ocean; how do they compare? ​"

— r/Fisker · 2026
▽ 0.40Range

"> SeaPhil4 said: > > Thats a pretty accurate estimate. I was around 30 miles last time i did this, but that was the SOC in Woodburn (about 30 miles south of PdX). > > > Click to expand... > MTN Ranger said: > > I haven't started editing the video yet, so the chart doesn't give all the detail. The test route was 312 miles. I made it to 283 miles (4% and 15 miles left on the meter) when I stopped to charge. So a total 298 miles of range at 100%. I was 29 miles shy of reaching my house (14 miles if I went to 0%). With better weather, I could have made it. > > > Click to expand... Driving from Los Gatos to Newport Beach as we speak. Started at 100% and now charging at Electrify America in Santa Maria. Arrived with 9%. 222 miles. So about 244 miles if took to zero percent. Mostly 75+/- mph. Fairly cold for CA, in mid to upper 30s for 1st 130 miles. Was hoping to get there with one stop but I don’t really want to stay until 100% charged and not sure I can get there anyway."

— Oceanforums · 2026
▽ 0.20Range

"> SeaPhil4 said: > > Great work, MTN Ranger! > > It gives me some faith that the Ocean will be a good summer road tripper. > > I am taking a trip to Portland on thursday morning- about 160 miles door to door to my destination and about 90% highway miles. I plan to charge at least to 90% so theoretically my guess-o-meter (Copyright @TT97) should read 324 at the start of my drive and hopefully have at least 100 miles left at destination if i keep it in Earth mode, use cruise control set at posted limit (varies between 60 and 70 for the trip) and cool my jets while driving… 🤞 > > > Click to expand... Keep in mind that the 360 EPA range is the _blended_ range estimate, combining city and highway. I reverse engineered the EPA numbers, and got something like estimated highway range of ~328, if I recall correctly. So 90% of that is **295 miles**. So minus 160 would leave ~135 miles, but if you're driving at 70 mph, and using the heater, I would assume it will not get anything close to the ideal range. My guess is you have below 100 range left when you get to Portland. Maybe 80 miles or so."

— Oceanforums · 2026

Showing 6 of 7 owner excerpts (sorted by sentiment strength)

Frequently Asked Questions

The read 2024 Fisker Ocean Sport 22in · Score 55/100 · 4 recalls, 0 complaints (0/10K VINs) across 4 Reddit threads.

Other Fisker Ocean Years on TrimIndex