2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally
Premium Electric SUV · AWD
Based on battery health, build quality, owner data, EPA range, and market pricing
Below average for 2024 EV SUVs (class avg 66)
Personalize this scoreIs a low score bad?
Last scanned 12 days ago
The 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally puts down 480 hp, 265 miles of EPA range and a 91 kWh battery, and the score is below the comfortable threshold — discount-heavy negotiation only.
Score read
A 59/100 makes this a high-risk buy. Build quality score is the cleaner read at 81/100; range and efficiency score needs more diligence at 38/100. On Reddit, owners keep flagging the same two issues: build quality and software tech. A clean VIN lookup matters more than the headline count.
Price context
Used examples are running around $34,168. This trim started from $59,995 new, though options can push the actual sticker higher; treat the market number as your negotiation floor and pull a current KBB Fair Purchase before naming a price.
Who this is for
✓ Good for
- ⏱ Daily commuter ≤50 mi/day, predictable charging
✗ Avoid if you are a
- $ Bargain hunter Best TCO, reliability + low depreciation
Gotchas
- Serviceable Recall paperwork has to match the exact VIN.
Mitigation Use NHTSA and the automaker lookup, then require repair records instead of a verbal promise.
- Built in Range is the easy place to overbuy this trim (38/100).
Mitigation Check your commute, winter margin, and fast-charge plan before you assume the EPA number fits your use.
Pre-purchase inspection
- 1 Run the exact VIN through NHTSA and the automaker recall lookup before discussing price.
- 2 Compare the dashboard range estimate with the EPA 265-mile rating after a full charge.
- 3 Confirm how much of the 8-year/100,000-mile battery warranty remains and whether it transfers.
- 4 If road trips matter, run a short DC fast-charge session and watch whether speed tapers normally.
- 5 Map your normal highway route and winter margin against the EPA range before you treat it as a road-trip car.
VIN status first This model has 3 NHTSA recall records. The exact VIN lookup decides whether the car in front of you is clear.
Complaint context This scan found 39 NHTSA complaint records (2.2 per 10K VINs, low for any vehicle class). Read the themes below before treating the raw count as the verdict.
Price anchor Current market range is $26,300-$34,873. Use that range to compare listings for the same trim, mileage, and condition.
Pricing & Market Value
Score Breakdown
What matters most to you?
Drag the sliders to prioritize what you care about. Your TrimIndex Score recalculates instantly.
Vehicle Specifications
EVs at your price point that match or beat this trim
Price-gated peer set: vehicles within $24.5K–$36.7K market value (±20% of $30.6K). 6 outscore · 0 score within ±2. Mixed across makes — no "spend more, score better" comps.
Niro
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Stronger safety record
Model Y
- ✓ +65 mi more range
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better safety score
Mustang Mach-E
- ✓ +55 mi more range
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
- ✓ Better safety score
Kona
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
- ✓ Stronger safety record
- ✓ +-4 mi more range
EV6
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
- ✓ Better owner satisfaction
- ✓ Better safety score
XC40
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better safety score
The federal $4,000 used-EV credit ended Sept 30, 2025.
But 10 states still run their own used-EV rebate programs — some up to $5,000. Pick your state to see what's available for this trim.
Source & disclaimer
Dealers make ~$9,144 on the average car loan.
After the price is set, the finance manager runs four plays to rebuild margin. Every buyer without a pre-approval is a target. Here's exactly what they run — and what stops each one.
78% of dealer loans carry a hidden +1.13% markup above what the lender actually charges. You never see it — it's buried in the contract. · CFPB
Dealer must match or beat your lender — they can't add margin invisibly. The markup play is dead on arrival.
Once you answer, they stretch the term to hit your number. Median result: $4K less off the price, 12 more months on the loan. · Industry avg
Financing is done. Only the sale price is on the table — and the dealer knows it.
Back-office F&I profit averages $1,975/vehicle, up 8.5% YoY. These products exist — but dealer markup is 4–10x what you'd pay elsewhere. · Dealership Guy
Dealer GAP runs $500–1K. Your insurer sells the same coverage for $100–250 over 5 years. Now you know.
"Your loan fell through — come re-sign." This pulls your APR up +5% on average. It's legal. It works because you've already driven the car home. · Ctr for Responsible Lending
A lender commitment letter means the deal is final. "Pending dealer approval" doesn't apply. You can't be yo-yo'd.
That's 20 months of your car payment — handed to the dealer's finance department for nothing.
Takes 2 minutes. No obligation to use it — but you'll walk in with all the leverage.
Pre-approval is a soft credit inquiry — no score impact. FICO treats all auto-loan hard pulls within 14 days as one, so you can still shop rates at the dealer.
NHTSA Recalls (3)
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2022-2026 F-150 Lightning BEV, 2024-2026 Mustang Mach-E, and 2025-2026 Maverick vehicles. The integrated park module may fail to lock into the park position when the driver shifts into park. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 114, "Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention."
A loss of park function can allow the vehicle to rollaway, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2025 Mustang Mach E vehicles. In the event of a low battery charge, the electronic door latches may remain locked once the driver or front passenger exits and shuts the door, possibly trapping someone who is unable to use the inside door release handles, such as a child in the back seat.
The inability to enter or exit the vehicle in an emergency increases the risk of injury.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2023-2024 Maverick, Ford Bronco Sport, and Mustang Mach-E vehicles. The front windshield wiper motor may become inoperative, causing the wipers to fail.
Inoperative windshield wipers can reduce visibility in certain conditions, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govNHTSA Complaints (39 total · 2.2 per 10K US vehicles · low for any vehicle class)
The Mustang Mach-E Select has three driving modes. From least to most aggressive in terms of acceleration, they are Whisper, Engage, and Unbridle. When driving in 1-pedal mode where removing your foot from the accelerator causes the car to brake, the strongest application of brakes is in Whisper mode as well. It’s not aggressive, but it will bring the car to a stop over a shorter distance. There is a known and reported problem among drivers, shared often in driver forums like Reddit, where vehicles will change to Engage mode from either Whisper or Unbridle. Over a year ago, I first noticed my car doing this on a downhill exit from a highway to a stoplight. I engaged the brake when I realized I was approaching the stopped car in front of me faster than I should. Over the past 16 months, I’ve experienced this at least twice a month, with no way I’ve been able to discern of predicting when it will happen. I drive the car in the most energy-using and highest energy-recovering mode. I am well aware that the braking might change at any time, but am concerned my wife, who drives the car less than I do, or some other Mustang Mach-E driver will rear-end another vehicle by realizing too late the car is not slowing as expected. I’ve told my dealer, I called Ford, now I’m notifying you in the hopes you can get Ford to issue a software fix. This was something I just noticed again pulling in to my garage solely because I was showing my wife something, and I realized I had the time to report it. Here are a few links of people having this issue. [XXX] [XXX] / [XXX] You’ll see this has been happening with a wide variety of owners for years. Please do something before someone gets injured, if it hasn’t already happened. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The Mustang Mach-E Select has three driving modes. From least to most aggressive in terms of acceleration, they are Whisper, Engage, and Unbridle. When driving in 1-pedal mode where removing your foot from the accelerator causes the car to brake, the strongest application of brakes is in Whisper mode as well. It’s not aggressive, but it will bring the car to a stop over a shorter distance. There is a known and reported problem among drivers, shared often in driver forums like Reddit, where vehicles will change to Engage mode from either Whisper or Unbridle. Over a year ago, I first noticed my car doing this on a downhill exit from a highway to a stoplight. I engaged the brake when I realized I was approaching the stopped car in front of me faster than I should. Over the past 16 months, I’ve experienced this at least twice a month, with no way I’ve been able to discern of predicting when it will happen. I drive the car in the most energy-using and highest energy-recovering mode. I am well aware that the braking might change at any time, but am concerned my wife, who drives the car less than I do, or some other Mustang Mach-E driver will rear-end another vehicle by realizing too late the car is not slowing as expected. I’ve told my dealer, I called Ford, now I’m notifying you in the hopes you can get Ford to issue a software fix. This was something I just noticed again pulling in to my garage solely because I was showing my wife something, and I realized I had the time to report it. Here are a few links of people having this issue. [XXX] [XXX] / [XXX] You’ll see this has been happening with a wide variety of owners for years. Please do something before someone gets injured, if it hasn’t already happened. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
On January 15 I took my car to Tasca Ford for the "10,000 check up and NYS Inspection. I was given paperwork confirming that the car was functioning properly. On January 17, 2026 my parked, unoccupied 2024 Ford mach E crashed into my parents garage door. I brought the car back to Tasca on January 19 and again was told nothing was wrong with my brakes. I then took the car to an independent mechanic who confirmed the brakes were faulty. I also received a notice in the Ford App that there was a recall for my car. I called Ford to tell them about my accident and that I needed a loaner car. They first denied the recall then told they had "No remedy" at this time I had to contact the dealership. Tasca was still denying a recall and would not give me a loaner. On February 13, 2026 the car rolled out of park and hit an unoccupied car. I now have a rental car through Geico but only for 30 days.
On January 15 I took my car to Tasca Ford for the "10,000 check up and NYS Inspection. I was given paperwork confirming that the car was functioning properly. On January 17, 2026 my parked, unoccupied 2024 Ford mach E crashed into my parents garage door. I brought the car back to Tasca on January 19 and again was told nothing was wrong with my brakes. I then took the car to an independent mechanic who confirmed the brakes were faulty. I also received a notice in the Ford App that there was a recall for my car. I called Ford to tell them about my accident and that I needed a loaner car. They first denied the recall then told they had "No remedy" at this time I had to contact the dealership. Tasca was still denying a recall and would not give me a loaner. On February 13, 2026 the car rolled out of park and hit an unoccupied car. I now have a rental car through Geico but only for 30 days.
My 2024 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is under an active brake safety recall (NHTSA 25V863 / Ford 25C69) with no remedy available. Ford has not provided a repair timeline, alternative transportation, or any assistance. I am concerned about the safety of operating this vehicle due to the nature of the brake defect and the uncertainty surrounding when it will be fixed. This situation is creating a serious hardship for my household. My husband is a disabled veteran with multiple medical conditions and frequent medical appointments. I am responsible for transporting him, and we rely on having a safe and dependable vehicle. The unresolved brake defect makes me uncomfortable driving the vehicle, yet I have no alternative transportation. Ford Credit has declined to assist with a buyback, and the dealership cannot offer a repair because no remedy exists. I am requesting NHTSA’s assistance in ensuring Ford provides a timely remedy or appropriate support (such as a loaner vehicle or buyback) so that my family is not placed at risk due to an unresolved safety defect.
My 2024 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is under an active brake safety recall (NHTSA 25V863 / Ford 25C69) with no remedy available. Ford has not provided a repair timeline, alternative transportation, or any assistance. I am concerned about the safety of operating this vehicle due to the nature of the brake defect and the uncertainty surrounding when it will be fixed. This situation is creating a serious hardship for my household. My husband is a disabled veteran with multiple medical conditions and frequent medical appointments. I am responsible for transporting him, and we rely on having a safe and dependable vehicle. The unresolved brake defect makes me uncomfortable driving the vehicle, yet I have no alternative transportation. Ford Credit has declined to assist with a buyback, and the dealership cannot offer a repair because no remedy exists. I am requesting NHTSA’s assistance in ensuring Ford provides a timely remedy or appropriate support (such as a loaner vehicle or buyback) so that my family is not placed at risk due to an unresolved safety defect.
Everyday I drive the vehicle There are 2 error messages 1. Front Camera fault, service required 2. Pre-collision Assist not available I have 32 Pre-collision warning messages in the last month, one for every day I drive. I had to drive 4 hours with no cruise control causing my leg to cramp at the 2 hour mark. There needs to be a recall for this issue. Many many other owners of the Mach-e have mentioned the same.
Everyday I drive the vehicle There are 2 error messages 1. Front Camera fault, service required 2. Pre-collision Assist not available I have 32 Pre-collision warning messages in the last month, one for every day I drive. I had to drive 4 hours with no cruise control causing my leg to cramp at the 2 hour mark. There needs to be a recall for this issue. Many many other owners of the Mach-e have mentioned the same.
I was proceeding to drive home from an appointment with a friend, the car suddenly lost power and I had no control over anything. I was able to keep the steering wheel in the locked position trying to get to the side of the road. Thankfully the speed was only 25mph, as someone had just switched lanes and came in front of me. I was in the process of turning to enter the highway. I've been having a problem with this car since I purchased. I told Ford after this incident, that I fear to drive the vehicle with my family, because that's how scared I was when I had no control. I requested multiple times for someone from Ford Corporate to contact me, and still have not heard from anyone. On 11/26 I received a recall for the 12v battery, which is pretty much what keeps the car on and off, and I still have not heard from anyone in Ford corporate.
I was proceeding to drive home from an appointment with a friend, the car suddenly lost power and I had no control over anything. I was able to keep the steering wheel in the locked position trying to get to the side of the road. Thankfully the speed was only 25mph, as someone had just switched lanes and came in front of me. I was in the process of turning to enter the highway. I've been having a problem with this car since I purchased. I told Ford after this incident, that I fear to drive the vehicle with my family, because that's how scared I was when I had no control. I requested multiple times for someone from Ford Corporate to contact me, and still have not heard from anyone. On 11/26 I received a recall for the 12v battery, which is pretty much what keeps the car on and off, and I still have not heard from anyone in Ford corporate.
Driving to work as usual and the road is clear just damp from a slight rain. When all the sudden the car just started swerving signaling that the road is wet. But even if wet it shouldn’t swerve like crazy on its own. Causing me to almost crash. It was the most scariest thing that happened to me. I’m taking it to ford dealership tomorrow but not sure how this will be fixed. Now I’m scared to drive on rainy days. I have drove before in rainy days and never had this happen. Today weather when driving wasn’t bad just slight damp on the road and it just started swerving like crazy and I wasn’t driving fast just on a normal street. I was scared to hop on the freeway to work. I skipped work because I was scared to drive.
Driving to work as usual and the road is clear just damp from a slight rain. When all the sudden the car just started swerving signaling that the road is wet. But even if wet it shouldn’t swerve like crazy on its own. Causing me to almost crash. It was the most scariest thing that happened to me. I’m taking it to ford dealership tomorrow but not sure how this will be fixed. Now I’m scared to drive on rainy days. I have drove before in rainy days and never had this happen. Today weather when driving wasn’t bad just slight damp on the road and it just started swerving like crazy and I wasn’t driving fast just on a normal street. I was scared to hop on the freeway to work. I skipped work because I was scared to drive.
There is an issue with Cruise Control while moving out of a parking space. I am concerned for my wife who knows nothing about technology. If she were to MISTAKENLY press the Cruise Control button while parked and a car is in front of her, the car's Cruise Control will ACTIVATE AND LUNG FORWARD at a speed of 15MPH. This can be frightening and in a panic a person can crash. This has happened to me on SEVERAL occasions but I am able to handle the situation. If it happens to my WIFE, there surely will be a HUGE problem. I can reproduce the problem very easily. If you are parked behind a car Cruise Control can be activated. If you are STOPPED and there are no cars in front of you, you CANNOT activate Cruise Control. Therefore, when you need Adaptive Cruise Control (for traffic jams) a double click of the button seems feasible. Single click when you are over 30mph. This should be an easy software update.
There is an issue with Cruise Control while moving out of a parking space. I am concerned for my wife who knows nothing about technology. If she were to MISTAKENLY press the Cruise Control button while parked and a car is in front of her, the car's Cruise Control will ACTIVATE AND LUNG FORWARD at a speed of 15MPH. This can be frightening and in a panic a person can crash. This has happened to me on SEVERAL occasions but I am able to handle the situation. If it happens to my WIFE, there surely will be a HUGE problem. I can reproduce the problem very easily. If you are parked behind a car Cruise Control can be activated. If you are STOPPED and there are no cars in front of you, you CANNOT activate Cruise Control. Therefore, when you need Adaptive Cruise Control (for traffic jams) a double click of the button seems feasible. Single click when you are over 30mph. This should be an easy software update.
Sudden unintended acceleration event. I was pulling into a parking spot going very slow and lifted my leg off the accelerator when the car suddenly surged forward and crashed into a tree, a wall and a nearby parked car (no people in the car). This put my safety at risk. I was thankfully not severely hurt and had no other passengers in my car. I have sustained some muscle strains in my neck. I have reported the incident to Ford Credit and requested the data logs and investigation. My airbags were also not deployed and this seems very similar to other reports I have seen online. The police were called to the site and a case filed. There was a message flashing "parking sensors fault".
Sudden unintended acceleration event. I was pulling into a parking spot going very slow and lifted my leg off the accelerator when the car suddenly surged forward and crashed into a tree, a wall and a nearby parked car (no people in the car). This put my safety at risk. I was thankfully not severely hurt and had no other passengers in my car. I have sustained some muscle strains in my neck. I have reported the incident to Ford Credit and requested the data logs and investigation. My airbags were also not deployed and this seems very similar to other reports I have seen online. The police were called to the site and a case filed. There was a message flashing "parking sensors fault".
Vehicle has a bearing noise in the front. Now vehicle has door fault, transmission not in park, auto hold fault and hill assist not available when driving the car. The car will engage parking brake randomly and when the brakes are wet the brakes will not engage for up to 50 feet. The car has become extremely unsafe and unpredictable. Ford’s road side assistance keeps delaying any tow and finally had to cancel the tow as I have to work. Need help badly with this!
Vehicle has a bearing noise in the front. Now vehicle has door fault, transmission not in park, auto hold fault and hill assist not available when driving the car. The car will engage parking brake randomly and when the brakes are wet the brakes will not engage for up to 50 feet. The car has become extremely unsafe and unpredictable. Ford’s road side assistance keeps delaying any tow and finally had to cancel the tow as I have to work. Need help badly with this!
New car making 65-75 db loud constant clunking noises when turning steering at stopped. 1st dealer visit, it said it’s normal because they have other of same model making same noises. 2nd visit, dealer said it’s noises from brake binding and it’s normal and showed me another car of same model making same noises. Problem is not resolved. When brake pedal is pressed, there shouldn’t be binding on new car. Binding means brake pad is slightly touching the rotor when brake pedal is released. When pressed, pads should firmly grip the rotor. Not gripping firmly means the caliper is pushing the pad against the rotor. Uneven brake pad shouldn’t be causing it either since it brand new. And it’s not brake bedding-in either. It’s now at 1944 miles. Brake binding is what the dealer say but could potentially be suspension problem and there are more of this model making same noises. No waning light. There were 3 times when it pulled to one side when driving straight. I have videos of the clunking when turning steering.
New car making 65-75 db loud constant clunking noises when turning steering at stopped. 1st dealer visit, it said it’s normal because they have other of same model making same noises. 2nd visit, dealer said it’s noises from brake binding and it’s normal and showed me another car of same model making same noises. Problem is not resolved. When brake pedal is pressed, there shouldn’t be binding on new car. Binding means brake pad is slightly touching the rotor when brake pedal is released. When pressed, pads should firmly grip the rotor. Not gripping firmly means the caliper is pushing the pad against the rotor. Uneven brake pad shouldn’t be causing it either since it brand new. And it’s not brake bedding-in either. It’s now at 1944 miles. Brake binding is what the dealer say but could potentially be suspension problem and there are more of this model making same noises. No waning light. There were 3 times when it pulled to one side when driving straight. I have videos of the clunking when turning steering.
Was driving when the driver instrument display went blank and is no longer functioning. This display shows speed of vehicle and other status information, such as battery level, range and cruise control status. There has been a software update remotely installed today, which may be a coincidence.
Was driving when the driver instrument display went blank and is no longer functioning. This display shows speed of vehicle and other status information, such as battery level, range and cruise control status. There has been a software update remotely installed today, which may be a coincidence.
There is an issue with the Mach E where while in a parking lot at low speeds the user may accidentally press the cruise control setting which will initiate the car jolting up to 15 mph (minimum speed for adaptive cruise control system) instantly. This happens when you are going 5 mph or less in a parking lot. Although this is more of a design issue where some users may not deal with this issue, it should be noted that forums have been posted about this same exact issue and it can cause a danger in terms of hitting pedestrians or other vehicles in parking lots or other slow moving traffic. There have been several instances where this has happened to me.
There is an issue with the Mach E where while in a parking lot at low speeds the user may accidentally press the cruise control setting which will initiate the car jolting up to 15 mph (minimum speed for adaptive cruise control system) instantly. This happens when you are going 5 mph or less in a parking lot. Although this is more of a design issue where some users may not deal with this issue, it should be noted that forums have been posted about this same exact issue and it can cause a danger in terms of hitting pedestrians or other vehicles in parking lots or other slow moving traffic. There have been several instances where this has happened to me.
While picking up my daughter from school this week, I entered a school parking lot and began a low-speed right turn to pull into a parking space. During this maneuver, the car unexpectedly and abruptly accelerated forward. I reacted immediately and applied the brakes, but the car traveled approximately two car lengths beyond the intended parking spot. I came to a stop across two parking spaces. This occurred in an active school pickup area with parents and children nearby. There were no cars or pedestrians directly in front of me at that moment. I still fear what the outcome might have been if anyone had been present. Immediately after stopping, I observed that the adaptive cruise control speed indicator on the instrument cluster was set to 15 and was crossed out, indicating it had recently been active and disengaged. However, I did not engage adaptive cruise control during that trip. Based on the car’s behavior and the display state, my best assessment is that adaptive cruise control was unintentionally engaged during the parking maneuver causing the car to attempt to accelerate toward a previously set cruise speed despite being in a low-speed, turning scenario. Again, I did not use ACC on this trip. A sudden acceleration in a school parking lot presents an extreme hazard. The only reason this incident did not result in injury or death was immediate braking and luck. There were no warning lamps or messages prior to the incident. The car has not yet been inspected by a dealer or manufacturer. I am aware of multiple publicly shared videos from other Mach-E owners documenting similar incidents, some resulting in crashes. This appears to be a systemic adaptive cruise control design or software issue that warrants immediate investigation and correction to avoid serious injury or death.
While picking up my daughter from school this week, I entered a school parking lot and began a low-speed right turn to pull into a parking space. During this maneuver, the car unexpectedly and abruptly accelerated forward. I reacted immediately and applied the brakes, but the car traveled approximately two car lengths beyond the intended parking spot. I came to a stop across two parking spaces. This occurred in an active school pickup area with parents and children nearby. There were no cars or pedestrians directly in front of me at that moment. I still fear what the outcome might have been if anyone had been present. Immediately after stopping, I observed that the adaptive cruise control speed indicator on the instrument cluster was set to 15 and was crossed out, indicating it had recently been active and disengaged. However, I did not engage adaptive cruise control during that trip. Based on the car’s behavior and the display state, my best assessment is that adaptive cruise control was unintentionally engaged during the parking maneuver causing the car to attempt to accelerate toward a previously set cruise speed despite being in a low-speed, turning scenario. Again, I did not use ACC on this trip. A sudden acceleration in a school parking lot presents an extreme hazard. The only reason this incident did not result in injury or death was immediate braking and luck. There were no warning lamps or messages prior to the incident. The car has not yet been inspected by a dealer or manufacturer. I am aware of multiple publicly shared videos from other Mach-E owners documenting similar incidents, some resulting in crashes. This appears to be a systemic adaptive cruise control design or software issue that warrants immediate investigation and correction to avoid serious injury or death.
My name is [XXX], and I am formally reporting an unacceptable and irresponsible delay regarding my Ford Mustang Mach-E (VIN: [XXX] ), serviced at Group 1 Ford of Southwest Houston (formerly Sterling McCall Ford). My vehicle is only 1.5 years old, yet the clear-coat paint has already deteriorated, and the vehicle is also subject to an official Ford recall. I reported both issues to the dealer more than two months ago. Despite multiple calls and follow-ups, the service department continues giving me the same unacceptable excuse: “We cannot take your vehicle because we do not have a loaner car available.” This is completely unreasonable. This is a recall, and refusal to accept my car due to a lack of loaner vehicles is not my responsibility — it is a failure of Ford and the dealer to provide required support. As a result: •My recall remains unresolved •The paint defect continues to worsen •I have no scheduled service date •I have been told to “wait indefinitely” with no solution This level of customer support is unprofessional, unacceptable, and harmful to the Ford brand. My Demands I request immediate corporate intervention: 1.A guaranteed service appointment without any further delay 2.A loaner vehicle or alternative transportation solution provided by Ford 3.Full repair of the recall and the paint clear-coat defect under warranty 4.Written confirmation of Ford’s next steps if the dealer continues refusing to accept my vehicle If this is not resolved immediately, I will escalate the issue to: •NHTSA (for failure to resolve an recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks), •Texas DMV / Consumer Protection, and •Public consumer platforms. I expect a response within 48 hours. Sincerely, [XXX] [XXX] Email: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
My name is [XXX], and I am formally reporting an unacceptable and irresponsible delay regarding my Ford Mustang Mach-E (VIN: [XXX] ), serviced at Group 1 Ford of Southwest Houston (formerly Sterling McCall Ford). My vehicle is only 1.5 years old, yet the clear-coat paint has already deteriorated, and the vehicle is also subject to an official Ford recall. I reported both issues to the dealer more than two months ago. Despite multiple calls and follow-ups, the service department continues giving me the same unacceptable excuse: “We cannot take your vehicle because we do not have a loaner car available.” This is completely unreasonable. This is a recall, and refusal to accept my car due to a lack of loaner vehicles is not my responsibility — it is a failure of Ford and the dealer to provide required support. As a result: •My recall remains unresolved •The paint defect continues to worsen •I have no scheduled service date •I have been told to “wait indefinitely” with no solution This level of customer support is unprofessional, unacceptable, and harmful to the Ford brand. My Demands I request immediate corporate intervention: 1.A guaranteed service appointment without any further delay 2.A loaner vehicle or alternative transportation solution provided by Ford 3.Full repair of the recall and the paint clear-coat defect under warranty 4.Written confirmation of Ford’s next steps if the dealer continues refusing to accept my vehicle If this is not resolved immediately, I will escalate the issue to: •NHTSA (for failure to resolve an recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks), •Texas DMV / Consumer Protection, and •Public consumer platforms. I expect a response within 48 hours. Sincerely, [XXX] [XXX] Email: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I lease a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. On [XXX] the vehicle suddenly displayed a High-Voltage Battery Fault, Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power warning. The dealer replaced the High-Voltage Junction Box (HVJB), however I am unsure whether the actual root cause was ever identified. This failure shows a major defect in the high-voltage electrical system. Separately, my vehicle is also subject to Recall 25S65 / NHTSA 25V404, where a discharged 12-volt battery can prevent the electronic door latches from opening, risking passenger entrapment. Ford has no remedy available and has only projected a future software update. My car is still at the dealership. These two issues are connected: the HV system (through the HVJB) powers the DC-DC converter that keeps the 12-volt battery charged. A failure on the HV side can starve the 12-volt system, which directly creates the entrapment risk described in the recall. I live in Florida, where extreme heat makes this risk especially dangerous for children, pets, and elderly passengers. What is my emergency plan...carry a hammer to break the windows on every trip? This is an unreasonable and unsafe expectation for consumers. Ford has not provided any fix or assurance of safety. I have specifically asked Ford whether my car is safe to drive — they have not provided any assurances, merely repeating that Ford has not issued a stop-driving order on the vehicle. This unresolved defect substantially impairs the use, value, and safety of my vehicle, and Ford has failed to provide an adequate repair. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I lease a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. On [XXX] the vehicle suddenly displayed a High-Voltage Battery Fault, Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power warning. The dealer replaced the High-Voltage Junction Box (HVJB), however I am unsure whether the actual root cause was ever identified. This failure shows a major defect in the high-voltage electrical system. Separately, my vehicle is also subject to Recall 25S65 / NHTSA 25V404, where a discharged 12-volt battery can prevent the electronic door latches from opening, risking passenger entrapment. Ford has no remedy available and has only projected a future software update. My car is still at the dealership. These two issues are connected: the HV system (through the HVJB) powers the DC-DC converter that keeps the 12-volt battery charged. A failure on the HV side can starve the 12-volt system, which directly creates the entrapment risk described in the recall. I live in Florida, where extreme heat makes this risk especially dangerous for children, pets, and elderly passengers. What is my emergency plan...carry a hammer to break the windows on every trip? This is an unreasonable and unsafe expectation for consumers. Ford has not provided any fix or assurance of safety. I have specifically asked Ford whether my car is safe to drive — they have not provided any assurances, merely repeating that Ford has not issued a stop-driving order on the vehicle. This unresolved defect substantially impairs the use, value, and safety of my vehicle, and Ford has failed to provide an adequate repair. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I am reporting a serious safety defect involving the electronic front door latches on my 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. During a 12V battery discharge, the electric latches can fail, preventing the doors from opening in the outside. This means the driver or passengers could become trapped in the vehicle, or the driver can be locked out in an emergency, even if both key fob and key are present. This defect poses a critical safety risk in situations requiring a rapid exit - such as accident or extreme heat and increases the risk of injury or death. As an active duty service member, I work in a secure federal government facility and have to leave my phone in my vehicle during working hours. This heightens the danger, because if the latch fails, I would have no secondary means to gain entry or exit, potentially delaying emergency responses. Ford has acknowledged the defect in the recall (25S65/25V404) in early June. They said to expect an update by the end of Q3, which is nearing and I haven’t heard anything yet. I believe this defect warrants urgent attention, and consideration of a manufacturer buyback due to severe safety implications.
I am reporting a serious safety defect involving the electronic front door latches on my 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. During a 12V battery discharge, the electric latches can fail, preventing the doors from opening in the outside. This means the driver or passengers could become trapped in the vehicle, or the driver can be locked out in an emergency, even if both key fob and key are present. This defect poses a critical safety risk in situations requiring a rapid exit - such as accident or extreme heat and increases the risk of injury or death. As an active duty service member, I work in a secure federal government facility and have to leave my phone in my vehicle during working hours. This heightens the danger, because if the latch fails, I would have no secondary means to gain entry or exit, potentially delaying emergency responses. Ford has acknowledged the defect in the recall (25S65/25V404) in early June. They said to expect an update by the end of Q3, which is nearing and I haven’t heard anything yet. I believe this defect warrants urgent attention, and consideration of a manufacturer buyback due to severe safety implications.
I own a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E affected by recall 25S65 / 25V404. Ford has placed a stop-sale on all 2024 and older Mach-Es for this issue but is allowing current owners to drive the vehicles. The defect can trap occupants or pets inside if the 12V battery discharges, posing a serious safety risk in hot weather (currently 100°F in my area). I contacted Kendall Ford of Meridian, ID, on 8/14/25 to schedule the repair. They confirmed the remedy is a software update not yet available for my model year and estimated it will not be released until Q4 2025. This is more than 60 days after the recall was issued, and I have no safe remedy available. I believe Ford should provide an immediate fix, replacement vehicle, or buyback due to the safety risk.
I own a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E affected by recall 25S65 / 25V404. Ford has placed a stop-sale on all 2024 and older Mach-Es for this issue but is allowing current owners to drive the vehicles. The defect can trap occupants or pets inside if the 12V battery discharges, posing a serious safety risk in hot weather (currently 100°F in my area). I contacted Kendall Ford of Meridian, ID, on 8/14/25 to schedule the repair. They confirmed the remedy is a software update not yet available for my model year and estimated it will not be released until Q4 2025. This is more than 60 days after the recall was issued, and I have no safe remedy available. I believe Ford should provide an immediate fix, replacement vehicle, or buyback due to the safety risk.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the rear doors failed to open as needed and could only be opened while engaging the front driver's side power master door lock switch. The local dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 4,000.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the rear doors failed to open as needed and could only be opened while engaging the front driver's side power master door lock switch. The local dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 4,000.
I lease a brand-new 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E with approximately 5,000 miles. The vehicle is subject to NHTSA Campaign Number 25V404 (Ford Recall 25S65) for defective exterior electronic door latches that may fail to open if the 12-volt battery discharges. Ford has confirmed there is no repair available and no timeline for a fix. This defect has been acknowledged by my Ford dealer and Ford corporate. While Ford states that the interior manual handles still function, this ignores a serious real-world safety hazard. I frequently transport dogs and other passengers who cannot operate the manual handles. If I step outside the vehicle — even briefly — and the exterior handles fail, these occupants could be trapped inside. In an emergency such as extreme heat, cold, or fire, this could result in injury or death, and rescue would require breaking the glass, creating additional risk of harm. Ford’s own recall language acknowledges this is a “safety defect,” yet the current stance is that the vehicle is “safe to drive.” This does not address the entrapment risk for vulnerable occupants. The defect has not yet resulted in entrapment or injury, but it is an active and unresolved hazard that could occur without warning. This complaint is being filed to document the risk before harm occurs and to make sure a timely, safe remedy is provided.
I lease a brand-new 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E with approximately 5,000 miles. The vehicle is subject to NHTSA Campaign Number 25V404 (Ford Recall 25S65) for defective exterior electronic door latches that may fail to open if the 12-volt battery discharges. Ford has confirmed there is no repair available and no timeline for a fix. This defect has been acknowledged by my Ford dealer and Ford corporate. While Ford states that the interior manual handles still function, this ignores a serious real-world safety hazard. I frequently transport dogs and other passengers who cannot operate the manual handles. If I step outside the vehicle — even briefly — and the exterior handles fail, these occupants could be trapped inside. In an emergency such as extreme heat, cold, or fire, this could result in injury or death, and rescue would require breaking the glass, creating additional risk of harm. Ford’s own recall language acknowledges this is a “safety defect,” yet the current stance is that the vehicle is “safe to drive.” This does not address the entrapment risk for vulnerable occupants. The defect has not yet resulted in entrapment or injury, but it is an active and unresolved hazard that could occur without warning. This complaint is being filed to document the risk before harm occurs and to make sure a timely, safe remedy is provided.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that after the vehicle was parked with the engine turned off, the front driver’s side door failed to open as intended. After several attempts with the key fob and the door latch, the doors failed to open. A family member opened the door. The local dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact was informed that the door needed to fail three times to be repaired. The contact stated that on a separate occasion, while driving at an undisclosed speed, there was an abnormal sound coming from the vehicle. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired after the most recent failure. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The failure mileage was approximately 9,500.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that after the vehicle was parked with the engine turned off, the front driver’s side door failed to open as intended. After several attempts with the key fob and the door latch, the doors failed to open. A family member opened the door. The local dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact was informed that the door needed to fail three times to be repaired. The contact stated that on a separate occasion, while driving at an undisclosed speed, there was an abnormal sound coming from the vehicle. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired after the most recent failure. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The failure mileage was approximately 9,500.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated that upon investigation, the contact became aware that the vehicle was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages). However, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was not contacted. The contact investigated and found out that the dealer had been notified about the recall. The contact stated that the Salesperson opened the door for the contact and informed that contact that the vehicle needed to be sold for tax reasons. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated that upon investigation, the contact became aware that the vehicle was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages). However, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was not contacted. The contact investigated and found out that the dealer had been notified about the recall. The contact stated that the Salesperson opened the door for the contact and informed that contact that the vehicle needed to be sold for tax reasons. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
[XXX] @ [XXX] The door locks are not opening from the outside. The battery will not charge. I cannot get my items out. I have a [XXX] work & personal electronics, along with personal items for myself & my family, inside that I cannot access. It's early Sunday morning, I am over 3 hours away from home, in Corpus Christi, with my brother & [XXX] nephew, along with both of my Dogs. The ford dealerships in this city will not be open until Monday. The plan was to stay for a night & drive back home, as both myself & brother have to work on Monday. I am a therapist (Psychotherapist) with critical clients, & this is problematic. This is NOT the 1st or 2ND time I had an issue like this. This is actually the 3RD time, but the last time I dealt with this, the dealership had no recollection or documentation of a bad battery or battery issues; however, that IS what I was told the first time, but when I picked it up, I was told they just FIXED something, with the battery. The 2nd time, the doors locked up, the battery would not charge & I had it towed to the same dealership, that it was purchased from, from my home of Giddings, TX to College Station, TX, & I was told, I needed a whole new Battery replacement. The car was purchased brand new with approximately 11 miles in October/November of 2024, & it currently has between 7000-8000 (I do not remember the total amount, but it has over 7,000, but less than 8,000). Fast forward to roadside giving me a hard time for having to bring a device to charge the battery to open it, leaving, & cutting my wrist, while grabbing things out of the vehicle, between the seat & center console, as my hand got stuck, & I forgot the seat could not move without any electric charge (there is a JAGGED edge in between that it's dangerous for ANYONE, & it's hidden by a cloth flap). I also had to pay for a rental vehicle despite having this service, when the dealership opened, for 2 days). INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
[XXX] @ [XXX] The door locks are not opening from the outside. The battery will not charge. I cannot get my items out. I have a [XXX] work & personal electronics, along with personal items for myself & my family, inside that I cannot access. It's early Sunday morning, I am over 3 hours away from home, in Corpus Christi, with my brother & [XXX] nephew, along with both of my Dogs. The ford dealerships in this city will not be open until Monday. The plan was to stay for a night & drive back home, as both myself & brother have to work on Monday. I am a therapist (Psychotherapist) with critical clients, & this is problematic. This is NOT the 1st or 2ND time I had an issue like this. This is actually the 3RD time, but the last time I dealt with this, the dealership had no recollection or documentation of a bad battery or battery issues; however, that IS what I was told the first time, but when I picked it up, I was told they just FIXED something, with the battery. The 2nd time, the doors locked up, the battery would not charge & I had it towed to the same dealership, that it was purchased from, from my home of Giddings, TX to College Station, TX, & I was told, I needed a whole new Battery replacement. The car was purchased brand new with approximately 11 miles in October/November of 2024, & it currently has between 7000-8000 (I do not remember the total amount, but it has over 7,000, but less than 8,000). Fast forward to roadside giving me a hard time for having to bring a device to charge the battery to open it, leaving, & cutting my wrist, while grabbing things out of the vehicle, between the seat & center console, as my hand got stuck, & I forgot the seat could not move without any electric charge (there is a JAGGED edge in between that it's dangerous for ANYONE, & it's hidden by a cloth flap). I also had to pay for a rental vehicle despite having this service, when the dealership opened, for 2 days). INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that upon parking and turning off the vehicle, the contact attempted to exit the vehicle, but the front driver's side door failed to open as intended. The contact called AAA, who assisted in unlocking the door and jumpstarted the vehicle. The contact was able to exit the vehicle. The dealer was contacted and sent a mobile mechanic to the residence to diagnose the vehicle; however, the mechanic was unable to determine the cause of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact later received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages), which the contact related to the failure; however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was unknown. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that upon parking and turning off the vehicle, the contact attempted to exit the vehicle, but the front driver's side door failed to open as intended. The contact called AAA, who assisted in unlocking the door and jumpstarted the vehicle. The contact was able to exit the vehicle. The dealer was contacted and sent a mobile mechanic to the residence to diagnose the vehicle; however, the mechanic was unable to determine the cause of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact later received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages), which the contact related to the failure; however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was unknown. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that the rear passenger's side doors failed to open while passengers were attempting to exit the vehicle, requiring the contact to open the door from the outside. The contact stated that the child lock system was not the cause of the failure. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was not contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 12,000.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that the rear passenger's side doors failed to open while passengers were attempting to exit the vehicle, requiring the contact to open the door from the outside. The contact stated that the child lock system was not the cause of the failure. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was not contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 12,000.
I am the owner of a 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E affected by Recall 25S65 involving a 12V battery discharge issue that creates a serious entrapment hazard. If the 12V battery fails, the front doors can remain locked—even if someone exits using the mechanical release. This puts me and my family at risk of being locked inside or outside the vehicle in dangerous situations. I live in Texas, and I have two young daughters—both in car seats. The idea that this vehicle could trap us inside during a power failure, especially in Texas heat, is terrifying. I bought this vehicle to transport my family safely, and I no longer trust it to do that. Ford has admitted the risk exists but has said that a remedy won’t be available until Q3 2025. I contacted the dealership and confirmed that no parts or software are available. That leaves me and my family vulnerable for an unknown number of months. This is not a minor inconvenience—it’s a safety failure with real consequences. I am respectfully demanding a full vehicle buyback. I will not wait until the worst happens. The vehicle poses an immediate and unacceptable risk, and Ford’s delayed timeline makes continued ownership unreasonable. I need help ensuring my family is protected.
I am the owner of a 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E affected by Recall 25S65 involving a 12V battery discharge issue that creates a serious entrapment hazard. If the 12V battery fails, the front doors can remain locked—even if someone exits using the mechanical release. This puts me and my family at risk of being locked inside or outside the vehicle in dangerous situations. I live in Texas, and I have two young daughters—both in car seats. The idea that this vehicle could trap us inside during a power failure, especially in Texas heat, is terrifying. I bought this vehicle to transport my family safely, and I no longer trust it to do that. Ford has admitted the risk exists but has said that a remedy won’t be available until Q3 2025. I contacted the dealership and confirmed that no parts or software are available. That leaves me and my family vulnerable for an unknown number of months. This is not a minor inconvenience—it’s a safety failure with real consequences. I am respectfully demanding a full vehicle buyback. I will not wait until the worst happens. The vehicle poses an immediate and unacceptable risk, and Ford’s delayed timeline makes continued ownership unreasonable. I need help ensuring my family is protected.
On 5/14/2025 at aprox 5:35pm I was completely stopped in traffic when all of a sudden my car started to accelerate without me pressing on the accelerator. I pressed the brake pedal, however the car continued to move forward, by this time the brake pedal was pressed to the floor and the car was continuing to more forward. I was stopped aprox 6 feet behind a semi truck, and ended up crashing into the back of the semi. The car continued to surge forward, even though my car was pressed against the back of the semi. It was at that time when I put the car in Neutral. When traffic started to move, I followed the truck, but apparently he did not realize I had hit him. I was able to drive home. There was significant damage to the front of my car. Normally I would get an alert if I am too close to the car in front of me to prevent an accident, the alert never came on. The airbags did not deploy. I was in 1 pedal driving mode when this happened, and after the incident I switched to 2 pedal driving. I have an app for my car and it does not state any accidents occurred, there are no alerts listed for this day.
On 5/14/2025 at aprox 5:35pm I was completely stopped in traffic when all of a sudden my car started to accelerate without me pressing on the accelerator. I pressed the brake pedal, however the car continued to move forward, by this time the brake pedal was pressed to the floor and the car was continuing to more forward. I was stopped aprox 6 feet behind a semi truck, and ended up crashing into the back of the semi. The car continued to surge forward, even though my car was pressed against the back of the semi. It was at that time when I put the car in Neutral. When traffic started to move, I followed the truck, but apparently he did not realize I had hit him. I was able to drive home. There was significant damage to the front of my car. Normally I would get an alert if I am too close to the car in front of me to prevent an accident, the alert never came on. The airbags did not deploy. I was in 1 pedal driving mode when this happened, and after the incident I switched to 2 pedal driving. I have an app for my car and it does not state any accidents occurred, there are no alerts listed for this day.
Purchased new 2024 Ford Mach E on 03/31/25. Had 15 miles when purchased. On 04/10/25 at 185 miles on odometer, car experienced 2 malfunctions, Powertrain and High Voltage. This placed the car at alternating restricted speed of 5-12 mph on a highway. Towed vehicle to dealership same day as unsafe to drive. On 04/18/25, dealership technician cleared the Diagnostic Trouble Codes and stated that they were unable to recreate error condition, therefore wanted to release the car as is with no recommended fix. The technician called it an "intermittent" Trouble code.
Purchased new 2024 Ford Mach E on 03/31/25. Had 15 miles when purchased. On 04/10/25 at 185 miles on odometer, car experienced 2 malfunctions, Powertrain and High Voltage. This placed the car at alternating restricted speed of 5-12 mph on a highway. Towed vehicle to dealership same day as unsafe to drive. On 04/18/25, dealership technician cleared the Diagnostic Trouble Codes and stated that they were unable to recreate error condition, therefore wanted to release the car as is with no recommended fix. The technician called it an "intermittent" Trouble code.
The HVBJB failed on my 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-e. I first noticed a dashboard warning regarding a powertrain malfunction when I tried to start the car about a half-hour after we returned home from an approximately 170-mile drive five days ago. The warning said it was a powertrain malfunction and to get service soon. The car started an hour later and I was able to drive it to the Ford Service center where I bought the new car only last June. There they diagnosed the problem with this language: "HV JUNCTION BOX - FOUND P0AA1:68 AND P0AA1:00 TO BE HARD SET AND THE TO BE IN LIMP MODE. NEED TO REPLACE HV JUNCTION BOX ( 414-03A PPT P4 ) AND RETEST ALL MODULES. WILL NEED MORE TIME AFTER REPAIR TO TEST ALL SYSTEM. MEY NEED TO TAKE APART HV BATTERY AGIAN..." The service people told me that they need to keep the car for two weeks to replace the part and conduct follow-up tests. I know that the failed component has been the subject of two past recalls (2022, 2023) of the 2020-2022 model years for the Mach-e. The first recall resulted in Ford's attempt at a software fix, while the second required replacing the HVBJB in cars in which the software fix proved insufficient, presumably because the part had already been damaged before the fix and later failed under heat stress. Based on my experience this week it seems clear that neither recall resulted in Ford fixing the underlying problem with the part. Importantly, Ford says the part is subject to failure from overheating when drivers too often use high speed chargers (DC) or too often employ maximum acceleration. This admission contradicts Ford's own marketing of the car, which emphasizes its sportiness and fast acceleration, and its compatibility (with an adapter) with Tesla's large national network of superchargers. So the nature of the failing part is apparently wholly incompatible with what attracts many buyers to the car. Can NHTSA require Ford to make the necessary engineering fix to the part?
The HVBJB failed on my 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-e. I first noticed a dashboard warning regarding a powertrain malfunction when I tried to start the car about a half-hour after we returned home from an approximately 170-mile drive five days ago. The warning said it was a powertrain malfunction and to get service soon. The car started an hour later and I was able to drive it to the Ford Service center where I bought the new car only last June. There they diagnosed the problem with this language: "HV JUNCTION BOX - FOUND P0AA1:68 AND P0AA1:00 TO BE HARD SET AND THE TO BE IN LIMP MODE. NEED TO REPLACE HV JUNCTION BOX ( 414-03A PPT P4 ) AND RETEST ALL MODULES. WILL NEED MORE TIME AFTER REPAIR TO TEST ALL SYSTEM. MEY NEED TO TAKE APART HV BATTERY AGIAN..." The service people told me that they need to keep the car for two weeks to replace the part and conduct follow-up tests. I know that the failed component has been the subject of two past recalls (2022, 2023) of the 2020-2022 model years for the Mach-e. The first recall resulted in Ford's attempt at a software fix, while the second required replacing the HVBJB in cars in which the software fix proved insufficient, presumably because the part had already been damaged before the fix and later failed under heat stress. Based on my experience this week it seems clear that neither recall resulted in Ford fixing the underlying problem with the part. Importantly, Ford says the part is subject to failure from overheating when drivers too often use high speed chargers (DC) or too often employ maximum acceleration. This admission contradicts Ford's own marketing of the car, which emphasizes its sportiness and fast acceleration, and its compatibility (with an adapter) with Tesla's large national network of superchargers. So the nature of the failing part is apparently wholly incompatible with what attracts many buyers to the car. Can NHTSA require Ford to make the necessary engineering fix to the part?
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? The high-voltage battery system and powertrain system both failed. The vehicle went into limp mode, showing alerts for “Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power” and a “High-Voltage Battery Warning.” The vehicle is available for inspection if requested. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? The incident occurred while driving on the freeway at 75–77 mph, which significantly increased the risk of a crash. The sudden loss of power in heavy traffic was dangerous and could have led to a collision. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Not yet. The issue has been documented through the Ford app and in-vehicle warning messages, and I am in the process of waiting for a diagnostic to be completed by the dealer. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? Waiting for dealer to look at it. Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? Yes, immediately before and during the failure, the vehicle and the Ford app displayed messages indicating a powertrain malfunction/reduced power, along with a high-voltage battery warning alert. Additional description: While driving on the freeway at approximately 75–77 mph, the vehicle suddenly entered limp mode with a dramatic reduction in speed and power. Warning lights for a powertrain malfunction and high-voltage battery appeared. This created an unsafe situation in high-speed traffic. The vehicle had approximately 1,459 miles at the time of the incident. This also happened on my 2022 ford mustang Mach E 8 other times. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? The high-voltage battery system and powertrain system both failed. The vehicle went into limp mode, showing alerts for “Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power” and a “High-Voltage Battery Warning.” The vehicle is available for inspection if requested. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? The incident occurred while driving on the freeway at 75–77 mph, which significantly increased the risk of a crash. The sudden loss of power in heavy traffic was dangerous and could have led to a collision. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Not yet. The issue has been documented through the Ford app and in-vehicle warning messages, and I am in the process of waiting for a diagnostic to be completed by the dealer. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? Waiting for dealer to look at it. Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? Yes, immediately before and during the failure, the vehicle and the Ford app displayed messages indicating a powertrain malfunction/reduced power, along with a high-voltage battery warning alert. Additional description: While driving on the freeway at approximately 75–77 mph, the vehicle suddenly entered limp mode with a dramatic reduction in speed and power. Warning lights for a powertrain malfunction and high-voltage battery appeared. This created an unsafe situation in high-speed traffic. The vehicle had approximately 1,459 miles at the time of the incident. This also happened on my 2022 ford mustang Mach E 8 other times. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact purchased a Nivion Tesla charger adapter and received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25E001000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer was contacted; however, the contact was only able to leave a message and had not yet received a response. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact purchased a Nivion Tesla charger adapter and received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25E001000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer was contacted; however, the contact was only able to leave a message and had not yet received a response. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.
Turned car on, dashboard read 2 errors of "rear cross traffic sensors fault" and "blind spot monitoring fault". They cleared, drove the car, while driving the dashboard and infotainment went dark. Drivetrain and brakes still functioning but without speedometer and state of charge. Was able to turn around and go back home. Attempted reboot, so far nothing has fixed it.
Turned car on, dashboard read 2 errors of "rear cross traffic sensors fault" and "blind spot monitoring fault". They cleared, drove the car, while driving the dashboard and infotainment went dark. Drivetrain and brakes still functioning but without speedometer and state of charge. Was able to turn around and go back home. Attempted reboot, so far nothing has fixed it.
OBCC fails. Can not charge the car. Smells of burning.
OBCC fails. Can not charge the car. Smells of burning.
While driving the vehicle electrical console started flashing then lost power and stopped dead in the road. The battery was reading between 70% to 80% prior with a range of over 250 miles still available. Due to complete lack of any power the car could not be moved or placed into neutral for towing. It caused a traffic situation blocking 2 lanes of traffic for approximately 4 hours waiting for roadside assistance for jump start and towing. EV's cannot be towed like a regular car and not having access to the electronics made the car like a brick. Eventually I was able to attain assistance with a jump start that was able to provide enough power to drive onto the back of a tow truck and to the Ford dealership. Roadside assistance noted the 12-volt battery at the front of the vehicle was bulging and potentially overheated creating a potential explosion hazard and lack of electrical support to the main vehicle.
While driving the vehicle electrical console started flashing then lost power and stopped dead in the road. The battery was reading between 70% to 80% prior with a range of over 250 miles still available. Due to complete lack of any power the car could not be moved or placed into neutral for towing. It caused a traffic situation blocking 2 lanes of traffic for approximately 4 hours waiting for roadside assistance for jump start and towing. EV's cannot be towed like a regular car and not having access to the electronics made the car like a brick. Eventually I was able to attain assistance with a jump start that was able to provide enough power to drive onto the back of a tow truck and to the Ford dealership. Roadside assistance noted the 12-volt battery at the front of the vehicle was bulging and potentially overheated creating a potential explosion hazard and lack of electrical support to the main vehicle.
Phone wireless charging pad causes excessive heat and phone operation issues, including Bluetooth, wireless CarPlay disconnects.
Phone wireless charging pad causes excessive heat and phone operation issues, including Bluetooth, wireless CarPlay disconnects.
Completely locked out of car without any access. No way of unlocking car. I tried via key fob, key pad, approach, mobile app. The locks are completely electronic, so no way to mechanically unlock. Had to call a tow truck to tow it to the dealership where I bought it just a couple weeks earlier. 2 days earlier, an OTA update was installed that was labeled as improving battery optimization. This seems to be what triggered the issue. Many owners of 2023 and 2024 Mustang Mach E's are experiencing the same issue.
Completely locked out of car without any access. No way of unlocking car. I tried via key fob, key pad, approach, mobile app. The locks are completely electronic, so no way to mechanically unlock. Had to call a tow truck to tow it to the dealership where I bought it just a couple weeks earlier. 2 days earlier, an OTA update was installed that was labeled as improving battery optimization. This seems to be what triggered the issue. Many owners of 2023 and 2024 Mustang Mach E's are experiencing the same issue.
Trim around back window is kept on with sticky tape and it comes off on highway driving. Poses a safety risk
Trim around back window is kept on with sticky tape and it comes off on highway driving. Poses a safety risk
Recall issued 6/13/2025 and Ford has not announced a remedy to this issue. Ford is required to have a remedy within a timely manner. It has been over two months.
Recall issued 6/13/2025 and Ford has not announced a remedy to this issue. Ford is required to have a remedy within a timely manner. It has been over two months.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact was concerned for her safety and the safety of her baby because there was no mechanism that could temporarily override the failure in the event the failure occurred in significantly hot weather. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. The VIN was not available.
The contact owns a 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact was concerned for her safety and the safety of her baby because there was no mechanism that could temporarily override the failure in the event the failure occurred in significantly hot weather. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. The VIN was not available.
I bought my vehicle in late June and in mid august, we notice the body started becoming rough to touch. It went from smooth and sleek black body to rough and spotty.
I bought my vehicle in late June and in mid august, we notice the body started becoming rough to touch. It went from smooth and sleek black body to rough and spotty.
What Owners Are Saying
"Review and Feedback on FitCamX Dashcam Became the proud owner of Richtofen (2024 AWD Premium) last fall and am nothing but impressed so far. This is my first "new to me" vehicle in a long time, so of course I've been adding accessories and "upgrades" to personalize him and make him "mine." My Signifiant Other saw the FitCamX on my Christmas Wishlist and on Christmas morning I was pleasantly surprised to find it under the tree! Due the cold and some unforseen issues I just got around to installing it and thought I'd share my thoughts with the community! Here is the product page if you are not familiar with the product: **The Product** \- The dashcam itself is pretty basic. It is forward facing only, and does NOT have location/speed/GPS info/integration. What made it attractive to me is that once it is installed, it is pretty much invisible and looks like it is a factory feature! There is no hardware stuck to the window and no cables to route or take up a USB jack. There are trade-offs, but I prefer the clean look and appearance over the more advanced features. **Installation -** Installation was pretty straight forward. Scanning a QR code takes one to a manufacturer's video that walks the user through each step the installation process. Here is a summary of the main steps: 1. Removed the factory plastic cover around the rear view mirror using the plastic pry tool that comes in the packaging. (This made me nervous, but was easier that I expected) 2. Transfer the retaining clips from the factory plastic cover to the FitCamX plastic cover. 3. Unplug the rain sensor and install the included Y-connector cable to connect the FitCamX to the car's electrical power. 4. Route / tuck in the cables and re-attach the camera / plastic cover to the car. 5. Turn on the car and connect the dashcam's Wi-Fi to your phone to verify its operation. The intallation is not difficult and can be done by anyone with a little patience. Overall it will took about 20 minutes from start to finish. **Support** \-I did have a slight issue with the product. When I first installed the dashcam, it would not power on and all the troublshooting steps were unsuccessful. Tech Support is pretty much only available via email, but they are VERY responsive. I wrote them about the power issue on Sunday morning (non-business hours) and had a reply first thing Monday morning (first business day). They requested a couple of photos of the install, verified that everything looked right, and ended up sending out a new Y-Connector cable. I received the cable a couple days later, installed it, but had the same issue (no power). I emailed them again explaining the situation which indicated that the issue had to be in the camera itself, and the next day I had a tracking numbe"
"> azerik said: > > Sadly repairs are not going to be able to keep the same factory quality specs. Some of that you'll sadly have to live with (follow up with the body shop but the door to quarter panel is quite hard to align) I've spent almost 2 hours aligning my rear hatch to get most of the gaps as close to the same as possible. I doubt the body shop has as much drive and OCD as I do. > > I do have a 19 inch wheel here but noticed you're in CA so it's cost prohibitive to send you. (edit: just realized after/before pics) > > > Click to expand... I had a 2016 Tesla Model S and the panel gaps were even worse aka larger on various spots. When I showed them, the Tesla tech said the gaps were within their tolerance of being acceptable...not what I wanted to hear as an excuse for poor workmanship on a $100,000 car. We also had a Smart EV...the workmanship on it was much better than our Tesla....gaps the same all over. I do have to admit that overall the workmanship quality on my MACH E is way better than the Tesla that had rattles in the interior that I could never pinpoint and fix."
"First NameEDJoinedOct 14, 2024Threads12Messages41Reaction score46LocationCALGARY, ALBERTAVehicles > markboris said: > > Hey Ed, the gap on your liftgate is easily fixable. There are two bumpers on either side (photos below) of the body. Since you have less of a gap on the right side. Slightly raise that bumper up. You may have to slightly lower the left bumper. Those bumper adjusters will equal out your liftgate gap. There is a bolt inside the bumper. Loosen it, adjust bumper then tighten. > > > > > > Click to expand... The auto body shoo fixed al the gaps as best as they could and I am okay with the results. The liftgate gaps were fixed adjusting the bumpers inside the tailgate....see attached pics."
"Ford Mustang Mach-E breaks Guinness World Record after 569 mile-trip on a single charge While I'm more for creature comforts and charging more myself (crank the AC/heat, use the USB ports, etc.) the article is interesting about how far the guy went with a MME, and below the link is some pointers to maximize range. **Article**: Ford Mustang Mach-E breaks Guinness World Record after 569 mile-trip on a single charge **Hypermiling 101: Maximizing Electric Vehicle Range** **1. Gentle Acceleration:** Electric vehicles, particularly performance-focused vehicles like the Mustang Mach-E, can deliver near instant torque with a single press of the accelerator pedal, making it tempting to accelerate aggressively. However, this can significantly reduce range. To maximize range, drivers should adopt a gentle approach, gradually increasing momentum to reach the desired speed. Hard acceleration consumes energy, ultimately diminishing the vehicle's overall range. **2. Utilize Regenerative Braking:** One of the key advantages of electric vehicles is regenerative braking. This system captures kinetic energy during deceleration and converts it back into usable electricity, effectively extending the car's range. By utilizing regenerative braking and one pedal drive, drivers minimize the need for traditional braking, further enhancing efficiency. **3. Tire Selection and Pressure:** Tire selection and pressure plays a crucial role in optimizing range. Choosing tires with low rolling resistance is essential, as they minimize energy loss during driving. Maintaining the proper tire pressure is equally important. Over inflated tires decrease the rolling resistance whereas underinflated tires increase it and impact range positively. Even a slight reduction in tire pressure can negatively affect the vehicle's performance. **4. Minimize Weight:** Excessive weight significantly impacts an electric vehicle's range. Drivers should strive to minimize the load carried in the vehicle, including passengers and cargo. Every additional pound adds to the energy required to move the vehicle, ultimately reducing the distance it can travel on a single charge. **5. Minimize Energy Consumption from Accessories:** Using features like air conditioning can also significantly impact range. While these features are convenient during everyday driving, drivers should use them sparingly to maximize efficiency when engaging in hypermiling driving behavior."
"Such a sad day So I’d like to present my very first photos with my 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select AWD. I want to say that I only had the vehicle for maybe 3 months. Here’s what happened: I got a call from the Ford dealership (local) that they found a Mach-E for me around the price I was looking to pay. The only thing was that they wanted to make sure I was ready to put a down payment on it immediately because they had to purchase it from another dealership. Once I gave my okay, the same day they purchased the vehicle was the same day I put in my down payment and signed the paperwork and drove off with the vehicle. I wish I knew then what I only know just more recently, which was that the vehicle itself was a lemon. I wish on that day I had immediately asked for the CarFax and had made sure everything was good. The first week I had it, I didn’t really notice anything wrong with it. I was loving it and driving around as much as I could. Then about a month in I started to notice some electrical issues and connection issues with my devices. I took it to the dealership and they had it for a moment but they ultimately just updated it and said it should be good. The other thing was that it was suppose to have the Ford Blue Cruise on it as it’s what they told me was added to it. The fact is, it didn’t, and when they tried to manually put in the software (because the vehicle already had the hardware for it), it just wasn’t sticking. A few weeks later, I go to put something in the back of the car and I notice an earthy smell. I lift up the platform in the back and discover MOLD growing. To make matters worse, I got an email with the CarFax. When I opened it, let me tell you how absolutely shocked I was to find out that the vehicle had actually been in a major front end collision before where ALL airbags deployed. I take this information and everything to the dealership who end up actually shocked and inform me that the dealer they bought it from never disclosed any of this information. Now I did do my part in contacting multiple lawyers, however, the cheapest one I found wanted a $5k retainer (which I didn’t have). I decided to just work with the dealership as they are(were) a reputable dealership. They end up taking the vehicle in promising to fix everything that’s either broken or needs to be repaired. Three weeks later, they inform me that they just want to buy back the vehicle the exact price I paid for it and give me my down payment back because they found out that because of the prior accident it had, it was never properly fixed and so any time it rained or if I took it to a car wash, it was getting inside the inside of the car (behind panels) and because of that noticed about $10k worth of damage including corroded electrical (explains the electrical issues). I ended up taking them up on their offer and they paid off my vehicle loan plus interest and gave me back my down payment (well, most of it). I’m so sad y’all,"
"5 weeks in the shop (No diagnoisis) *Update now 11 weeks* Update 02/11/2025 In 2 days this will be 11 weeks in the shop. It has been over 3 weeks with no response from Ford engineering. The local tech has reached out to the field service engineer (FSE) Sergio 8 times in the last 3 weeks and the handful of responses were that they still have not heard back from engineering. About 3 weeks ago the tech recieved a "break out box" that is supposed to allow them to monitor all car systems and simotaniously detach one module at a time. This process proved inconclusive and there is still no diagnoises on what the problem is. I did ask for a printout of the work order from the dealership for my records. This did remind me that my car is in for 2 items that I indicated and 1 that the dealership found. CS : "Electrical system drain - service required" displayed CS : "Eye-Tracking/bluecruise not working" and the fun surprise 3. Coolant low in both resvoirs. At this point nothing has been diagnoised and zero progress has been made. I requested, with Dorene from Ford, to resubmit another buyback request on my behalf and to indicate that I'm looking for a buyback because it is under warranty and it can not be fixed. I doubt this will go anywhere but I'm grasping at straws at this point. Also spoke with the local Service Manager. He thinks it is a software issue and that Ford doesn't know how to fix it. I told him about the buyback request getting denied and then submitting another. He requested Dorene's e-mail and he is going to reach out to his regional ford contact, "who is many levels above the woman you spoke to" and see if he can help push for a buyback as well. I spoke with a lemon law attorney as well and they indicated that I do have a case and they could move forward but their firm would only be going after financial compensation and expectations were 3-5k. If I was looking for a buyback or starting a lawsuit to get more from Ford they could refer me to another firm that could help me with that. They did let me know that with everything they've been working on lately Ford is fighting extremely hard to not buy back any electric vehicles or Broncos. They told me that they really dug their heels in within the last 3-6 months and it seems like a high level policy decision within Ford. I'd be happy with any suggestions on how to move forward at this point. Ford is incompetent and dragging their heels in regards to my vehicle and I feel like it's leaving me no options. **End Update** UPDATE 01/09/2025. 6 weeks in the shop today. No progress has been made since my original post. Our vehicle is a 2022' Ford Mustang Mach E GT Performance Edition that was purchased used in April of 2024 with ~4k miles from a dealership in Ohio and we had it shipped to Florida. The vehicle currently only has ~10k miles on it. I got a call back from Dorene at Ford (corporate) and my buyback was denied for being out of lemon law guideines for the state of Ohio, w"
"Mach E - Bricked? My 6-month-old 2023 Mustang Mach-E has been stranded at the Ford dealer for almost 4 weeks. 🤯 It completely locked me out one night, and they STILL can't figure out what's wrong. There were a few software updates right before it happened, so I'm wondering if one of those messed up the computer. Ford keeps pushing me to buy a new car (a 2023 model, no less!) and mentioned something called "trade assist" to help cover PART of the $20K gap on the new vehicle. Has anyone else had similar issues with their Mach-E? I’m really disappointed as this was my 2nd Mach E… #Ford #MustangMachE #Help"
"Signed Lease for Ford Mustang Mach-E but No Delivery Due to Recall – Paying for a Car I Don’t Have. Hey everyone, hoping for some advice. I signed a lease for a **2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E** on **June 20, 2025** through a dealership in Washington. The car was under an **active recall** at the time (which I found out after signing), and I was told verbally it would be delivered by June 27. As of today (June 24), **I still don’t have the car**. The problem: * My **lease payments have already started** (first payment processed as part of signing day payment - I have given zero downpayment though, only registration charges and first month lease included) * The lease is held by **Ford Motor Credit.** * I’m now **paying around $500/month** for a car I don’t even have yet * I’m also spending **money on a rental car weekly** just to get around The dealer says they’re waiting on Ford due to the recall, but that’s not helping me financially. I’m not sure if I should just wait until June 27, but this is starting to feel really unfair. I’m effectively paying for a vehicles and not using it. **What I’ve done so far:** * Spoke to the dealer (only got a vague "should be resolved by June 27") Has anyone been in a similar situation where: 1. The car wasn’t delivered after lease signing? 2. You were charged before you physically received the vehicle? 3. You successfully got a refund, lease adjustment, or some kind of reimbursement? Would appreciate any tips on what to say to Ford Credit or how to escalate this. Thanks in advance — I’m burning cash daily on a rental and feeling stuck. Edit : the reason for me getting worried about this is that there are news reporting about fix coming as late as Q3 end."
Showing 8 of 25 owner excerpts (sorted by sentiment strength)