2024 Cadillac LYRIQ AWD
Electric SUV · AWD
Based on battery health, build quality, owner data, EPA range, and market pricing
Below average for 2024 EV SUVs (class avg 66)
Personalize this scoreIs a low score bad?
Last scanned 12 days ago
The 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ AWD packs 500 hp, 307 miles of EPA range and a 100 kWh battery, and the score gets it into the conversation; battery and service records decide whether to make an offer.
Score read
A 60/100 makes this not a casual purchase. Do not let the composite hide this split: software and driver-assist score is 82/100, while owner feedback score is 47/100. Owners on Reddit repeatedly cite build quality and owner satisfaction as recurring problems. Documented completion matters more than the recall count itself.
Price context
Used examples are running around $38,259. Treat that as a budgeting floor, not a final price; pull a current KBB Fair Purchase or Edmunds True Market Value for this exact trim before negotiating.
Who this is for
✓ Good for
- ⏱ Daily commuter ≤50 mi/day, predictable charging
- ↦ Road tripper Long trips, needs DC fast network
✗ Avoid if you are a
- $ Bargain hunter Best TCO, reliability + low depreciation
Gotchas
- Serviceable Recall paperwork has to match the exact VIN.
Mitigation Use NHTSA and the automaker lookup, then require repair records instead of a verbal promise.
- Verify Owner feedback is the part to read carefully (47/100).
Mitigation Read the complaint themes and ask whether this VIN has already had those issues repaired.
Pre-purchase inspection
- 1 Run the exact VIN through NHTSA and the automaker recall lookup before discussing price.
- 2 Compare the dashboard range estimate with the EPA 307-mile rating after a full charge.
- 3 Confirm how much of the 8-year/100,000-mile battery warranty remains and whether it transfers.
- 4 If road trips matter, run a short DC fast-charge session and watch whether speed tapers normally.
- 5 Read the complaint themes, not just the count, and ask the seller whether those issues have shown up on this VIN.
VIN status first This model has 6 NHTSA recall records. The exact VIN lookup decides whether the car in front of you is clear.
Complaint context This scan found 106 NHTSA complaint records (27.9 per 10K VINs, elevated — verify before purchase). Read the themes below before treating the raw count as the verdict.
Price anchor Current market range is $33,400-$38,259. Use that range to compare listings for the same trim, mileage, and condition.
Pricing & Market Value
Score Breakdown
What matters most to you?
Drag the sliders to prioritize what you care about. Your TrimIndex Score recalculates instantly.
Vehicle Specifications
EVs at your price point that match or beat this trim
Price-gated peer set: vehicles within $28.7K–$43.0K market value (±20% of $35.8K). 6 outscore · 0 score within ±2. Mixed across makes — no "spend more, score better" comps.
Model Y
- ✓ Notably better build quality
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ +3 mi more range
e-tron S
- ✓ Notably better build quality
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
Ioniq 5
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ +11 mi more range
- ✓ Better safety score
iX
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ +-2 mi more range
- ✓ Better safety score
LYRIQ
- ✓ Happier owners overall
Q8 e-tron
- ✓ Notably better build quality
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
- ✓ Better safety score
The federal $4,000 used-EV credit ended Sept 30, 2025.
But 10 states still run their own used-EV rebate programs — some up to $5,000. Pick your state to see what's available for this trim.
Source & disclaimer
Dealers make ~$10,098 on the average car loan.
After the price is set, the finance manager runs four plays to rebuild margin. Every buyer without a pre-approval is a target. Here's exactly what they run — and what stops each one.
78% of dealer loans carry a hidden +1.13% markup above what the lender actually charges. You never see it — it's buried in the contract. · CFPB
Dealer must match or beat your lender — they can't add margin invisibly. The markup play is dead on arrival.
Once you answer, they stretch the term to hit your number. Median result: $4K less off the price, 12 more months on the loan. · Industry avg
Financing is done. Only the sale price is on the table — and the dealer knows it.
Back-office F&I profit averages $1,975/vehicle, up 8.5% YoY. These products exist — but dealer markup is 4–10x what you'd pay elsewhere. · Dealership Guy
Dealer GAP runs $500–1K. Your insurer sells the same coverage for $100–250 over 5 years. Now you know.
"Your loan fell through — come re-sign." This pulls your APR up +5% on average. It's legal. It works because you've already driven the car home. · Ctr for Responsible Lending
A lender commitment letter means the deal is final. "Pending dealer approval" doesn't apply. You can't be yo-yo'd.
That's 19 months of your car payment — handed to the dealer's finance department for nothing.
Takes 2 minutes. No obligation to use it — but you'll walk in with all the leverage.
Pre-approval is a soft credit inquiry — no score impact. FICO treats all auto-loan hard pulls within 14 days as one, so you can still shop rates at the dealer.
NHTSA Recalls (6)
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2024 Lyriq vehicles. The rearview camera screen may turn gray with no camera image.
An inoperative rearview camera can reduce the driver's rear visibility, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govGeneral Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2023 - 2024 model year Cadillac Lyriq vehicles. The driver video display may go blank while driving.
A blank video display can result in a loss of critical safety information, such as the speedometer, warning lights, and rearview camera image, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govGeneral Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2023-2025 Cadillac LYRIQ vehicles. The left or right front stabilizer bar bracket bolts may have been improperly tightened, which can allow the bolts to loosen and separate from the vehicle frame. A detached stabilizer bar or bracket can damage the vehicle's high voltage cables or EV battery coolant lines.
Damaged cables or coolant lines can result in a vehicle shutdown, causing a loss of drive power and increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govGeneral Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2023-2024 Cadillac LYRIQ all-wheel drive vehicles. The anti-lock brake system (ABS) may activate unexpectedly and release brake pressure in the vehicle's service brake system.
A release of brake pressure can cause a loss of braking ability, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govGeneral Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2024 Cadillac Lyriq, Chevrolet Blazer EV, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer EV SUV, and GMC Sierra EV vehicles. The electric motors in the rear drive units may have insufficiently insulated wires that can contact each other, resulting in a loss of drive power.
A loss of drive power increases the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govGeneral Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2023-2024 LYRIQ vehicles. The bracket that anchors the left-rear and center-rear seat belts may have been improperly welded to the seat frame.
An improperly welded seat belt bracket may not restrain an occupant as intended, increasing their risk of injury during a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govNHTSA Complaints (106 total · 27.9 per 10K US vehicles · elevated — verify before purchase)
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? The issue involves the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) and the transition between regenerative braking and friction braking in my Cadillac Lyriq (RWD). The ABS engages unexpectedly during normal braking conditions when using one-pedal driving. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? The unexpected ABS activation creates inconsistent and unpredictable braking behavior, including a pulsing sensation and reduced braking confidence. This affects the driver’s ability to modulate braking smoothly and predict stopping distance, increasing the risk of a collision, especially in normal traffic conditions where consistent braking response is critical. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Yes. The issue has been reproduced during multiple visits to authorized Cadillac dealerships. However, I have been told that the vehicle is “operating as designed,” despite the abnormal braking behavior. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? The vehicle has been inspected by multiple authorized Cadillac dealerships and the issue has been escalated to General Motors. No resolution or fix has been provided to date. Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? There are no warning lights or messages associated with this issue. The problem occurs intermittently during normal driving conditions, particularly when transitioning from regenerative braking (one-pedal driving) to applying the brake pedal. The issue began shortly after taking delivery of the vehicle and has persisted since.
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? The issue involves the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) and the transition between regenerative braking and friction braking in my Cadillac Lyriq (RWD). The ABS engages unexpectedly during normal braking conditions when using one-pedal driving. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? The unexpected ABS activation creates inconsistent and unpredictable braking behavior, including a pulsing sensation and reduced braking confidence. This affects the driver’s ability to modulate braking smoothly and predict stopping distance, increasing the risk of a collision, especially in normal traffic conditions where consistent braking response is critical. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Yes. The issue has been reproduced during multiple visits to authorized Cadillac dealerships. However, I have been told that the vehicle is “operating as designed,” despite the abnormal braking behavior. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? The vehicle has been inspected by multiple authorized Cadillac dealerships and the issue has been escalated to General Motors. No resolution or fix has been provided to date. Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? There are no warning lights or messages associated with this issue. The problem occurs intermittently during normal driving conditions, particularly when transitioning from regenerative braking (one-pedal driving) to applying the brake pedal. The issue began shortly after taking delivery of the vehicle and has persisted since.
We leased a Cadillac Lyriq on [XXX] for our Daughter [XXX] old) on [XXX] with my Son [XXX] ) while driving on [XXX] the car accelerator failed and my daughter pulled over. My wife received a text message from Onstar which said service the drive train immediately. My daughter pulled over and called me and said the car wasnt working and it was smoking. I told her to get out and call 911. This was a two day old car which during the course of normal driving stopped working and began to smoke, then a few minutes later was on fire. Thank God the doors were able to be opened and my kids got out safely. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
We leased a Cadillac Lyriq on [XXX] for our Daughter [XXX] old) on [XXX] with my Son [XXX] ) while driving on [XXX] the car accelerator failed and my daughter pulled over. My wife received a text message from Onstar which said service the drive train immediately. My daughter pulled over and called me and said the car wasnt working and it was smoking. I told her to get out and call 911. This was a two day old car which during the course of normal driving stopped working and began to smoke, then a few minutes later was on fire. Thank God the doors were able to be opened and my kids got out safely. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
COMPONENT: Vehicle Speed Control — Automatic Emergency Braking / Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) COMPLAINT: I am filing this complaint to report a POST-REMEDY FAILURE of the repair performed under NHTSA Safety Recall 24V589 (GM Program #N242453471) on my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq AWD. RECALL REMEDY COMPLETED: My vehicle received the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) software update on August 13, 2024, under GM Program #N242453471. The recall was marked "Complete" by the servicing dealership on that date. FAILURE INCIDENT: On March 15, 2026, at low speed (under 25 mph) on a dry surface, my Lyriq failed to activate its Automatic Emergency Braking system while approaching a stationary object. The vehicle did not decelerate or stop as designed. The ABS system appeared to release braking pressure rather than maintain it, allowing the vehicle to continue forward and strike the object. The front grille assembly sustained significant physical damage as a direct result. This failure is identical in nature to the defect described in Recall 24V589 — specifically, the ABS falsely activating and releasing braking pressure during low-speed operation on a dry surface — despite the recall remedy having been applied and certified complete ten months prior. SAFETY CONCERN: The software remedy applied under Recall 24V589 did not correct the defect on my vehicle. This raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the EBCM software update as a remedy across all affected vehicles. If other vehicles received the same software update and the defect persists, there is a significant ongoing safety risk to the public. I am requesting that NHTSA: Investigate whether the Recall 24V589 remedy (EBCM software update) has been effective across all affected vehicles Determine whether a supplemental or revised recall remedy is necessary Require GM/Cadillac to cover physical damages resulting from this post-remedy failure I have also contacted Cadillac Customer Care direct
COMPONENT: Vehicle Speed Control — Automatic Emergency Braking / Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) COMPLAINT: I am filing this complaint to report a POST-REMEDY FAILURE of the repair performed under NHTSA Safety Recall 24V589 (GM Program #N242453471) on my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq AWD. RECALL REMEDY COMPLETED: My vehicle received the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) software update on August 13, 2024, under GM Program #N242453471. The recall was marked "Complete" by the servicing dealership on that date. FAILURE INCIDENT: On March 15, 2026, at low speed (under 25 mph) on a dry surface, my Lyriq failed to activate its Automatic Emergency Braking system while approaching a stationary object. The vehicle did not decelerate or stop as designed. The ABS system appeared to release braking pressure rather than maintain it, allowing the vehicle to continue forward and strike the object. The front grille assembly sustained significant physical damage as a direct result. This failure is identical in nature to the defect described in Recall 24V589 — specifically, the ABS falsely activating and releasing braking pressure during low-speed operation on a dry surface — despite the recall remedy having been applied and certified complete ten months prior. SAFETY CONCERN: The software remedy applied under Recall 24V589 did not correct the defect on my vehicle. This raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the EBCM software update as a remedy across all affected vehicles. If other vehicles received the same software update and the defect persists, there is a significant ongoing safety risk to the public. I am requesting that NHTSA: Investigate whether the Recall 24V589 remedy (EBCM software update) has been effective across all affected vehicles Determine whether a supplemental or revised recall remedy is necessary Require GM/Cadillac to cover physical damages resulting from this post-remedy failure I have also contacted Cadillac Customer Care direct
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing, the rear-view safety sensor alert did not function as intended. In addition, the contact stated that the auto-braking safety sensor did not activate. The contact's vehicle crashed into a tree. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The contact stated that the case was denied. In addition, contact was denied to receive any documents providing the decision of the case. The failure mileage was approximately 18,125.
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing, the rear-view safety sensor alert did not function as intended. In addition, the contact stated that the auto-braking safety sensor did not activate. The contact's vehicle crashed into a tree. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The contact stated that the case was denied. In addition, contact was denied to receive any documents providing the decision of the case. The failure mileage was approximately 18,125.
I was traveling on the freeway at approximately 70 mph, at about 5:15 pm. I was not using cruise control. There was no one in front of me for maybe a quarter mile. Suddenly and without warning, the car slammed on the brakes. A yellow alert came up on the dash telling me the Forward Collision system had been activated. The red warning lights at the front of the dashboard (the heads-up display) also flashed. The road was dry, I was on an entirely straight section of road, and there were no shadows. Besides scaring me half to death, if someone had been immediately behind me, they could easily have slammed into me. The car has not been inspected by the dealer, etc. I believe OnStar should have a record of it happening, but I have not contacted them.
I was traveling on the freeway at approximately 70 mph, at about 5:15 pm. I was not using cruise control. There was no one in front of me for maybe a quarter mile. Suddenly and without warning, the car slammed on the brakes. A yellow alert came up on the dash telling me the Forward Collision system had been activated. The red warning lights at the front of the dashboard (the heads-up display) also flashed. The road was dry, I was on an entirely straight section of road, and there were no shadows. Besides scaring me half to death, if someone had been immediately behind me, they could easily have slammed into me. The car has not been inspected by the dealer, etc. I believe OnStar should have a record of it happening, but I have not contacted them.
On November 26, 2025, while traveling in stop-and-go freeway traffic, I experienced a severe braking failure that led to a rear-end collision. Despite applying maximum force to the brake pedal, the vehicle did not decelerate as expected. Objective technical evidence from the Bosch CDR report (Case #1105768) confirms a critical system failure: Extreme Driver Input: At -0.5 seconds before impact, Driver Applied Brake Pedal Pressure reached 10,935 kPa, representing a near-maximum emergency braking effort. Inadequate Response: Despite this peak pressure, the Vehicle Indicated Speed decreased only from 24 MPH to 22 MPH in the final 0.5-second interval. Data Discrepancy: The vehicle decelerated by 12 MPH (from 36 to 24 MPH) between -1.0s and -0.5s under lower pressure (7,695 kPa). However, when brake pressure was increased to its peak at -0.5s, deceleration effectively stalled. Electronic Anomaly: The Traction Control System (TCS) was reported as "Active" throughout the braking event, indicating potential improper electronic intervention. This vehicle has a history of significant electrical failures, including a total power loss on 10/15/2024 that required a high-voltage battery replacement. The failure of the braking system to respond to maximum driver input poses a catastrophic safety risk. I am requesting an investigation into the 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ's brake-by-wire and electronic stability control integration.
On November 26, 2025, while traveling in stop-and-go freeway traffic, I experienced a severe braking failure that led to a rear-end collision. Despite applying maximum force to the brake pedal, the vehicle did not decelerate as expected. Objective technical evidence from the Bosch CDR report (Case #1105768) confirms a critical system failure: Extreme Driver Input: At -0.5 seconds before impact, Driver Applied Brake Pedal Pressure reached 10,935 kPa, representing a near-maximum emergency braking effort. Inadequate Response: Despite this peak pressure, the Vehicle Indicated Speed decreased only from 24 MPH to 22 MPH in the final 0.5-second interval. Data Discrepancy: The vehicle decelerated by 12 MPH (from 36 to 24 MPH) between -1.0s and -0.5s under lower pressure (7,695 kPa). However, when brake pressure was increased to its peak at -0.5s, deceleration effectively stalled. Electronic Anomaly: The Traction Control System (TCS) was reported as "Active" throughout the braking event, indicating potential improper electronic intervention. This vehicle has a history of significant electrical failures, including a total power loss on 10/15/2024 that required a high-voltage battery replacement. The failure of the braking system to respond to maximum driver input poses a catastrophic safety risk. I am requesting an investigation into the 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ's brake-by-wire and electronic stability control integration.
I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.
I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.
On September 9, 2025, while slowly turning into a parking space at approximately 7 mph, the vehicle suddenly experienced unintended acceleration. There were no warnings, alerts, or Safety Alert Seat vibrations prior to the surge. The vehicle rapidly accelerated forward, struck a parked car, went over a curb, hit a tree, and finally came to rest after colliding with the side of a building. GM has since taken possession of the vehicle for forensic analysis.
On September 9, 2025, while slowly turning into a parking space at approximately 7 mph, the vehicle suddenly experienced unintended acceleration. There were no warnings, alerts, or Safety Alert Seat vibrations prior to the surge. The vehicle rapidly accelerated forward, struck a parked car, went over a curb, hit a tree, and finally came to rest after colliding with the side of a building. GM has since taken possession of the vehicle for forensic analysis.
I was driving on Saturday September 3 at 5 pm over the Chain Bridge entering Washington DC. Traffic was heavy and the auto brake went on when I was about 15 feet from the car in front of me. I was using one-pedal driving and when I pushed on the gas slowly we started slowly moving forward. I was traveling around 3 or 4 miles an hour and the car would not slow down when I took my foot over the pedal. One pedal driving apparently stopped working. I then applied the brakes gently and the brakes did not work. I then pushed the brakes hard and still no brakes worked. I tried pumping the brakes and nothing worked. The car gently ran into the car in front of me causing no damage to the car in front and he kept on his way. My front grill was cracked and bumper was slightly damaged. The signal on the dashboard said parking brake engaged which it was not. While the auto safety brake engaged minutes earlier when it was not needed it did not work when the car was drifting uncontrollably into the car in front of me.
I was driving on Saturday September 3 at 5 pm over the Chain Bridge entering Washington DC. Traffic was heavy and the auto brake went on when I was about 15 feet from the car in front of me. I was using one-pedal driving and when I pushed on the gas slowly we started slowly moving forward. I was traveling around 3 or 4 miles an hour and the car would not slow down when I took my foot over the pedal. One pedal driving apparently stopped working. I then applied the brakes gently and the brakes did not work. I then pushed the brakes hard and still no brakes worked. I tried pumping the brakes and nothing worked. The car gently ran into the car in front of me causing no damage to the car in front and he kept on his way. My front grill was cracked and bumper was slightly damaged. The signal on the dashboard said parking brake engaged which it was not. While the auto safety brake engaged minutes earlier when it was not needed it did not work when the car was drifting uncontrollably into the car in front of me.
I was driving at a steady 65mph on a highway when the car suddenly surged and the message "1 pedal driving deactivated. Use brakes to stop." I stopped the car with the brakes and restarted it and reactivated 1 pedal driving. Note I was NOT using regenerative braking at the time. The car surged a few miles an hour, and in a heavy traffic scenario could have easily caused a crash.
I was driving at a steady 65mph on a highway when the car suddenly surged and the message "1 pedal driving deactivated. Use brakes to stop." I stopped the car with the brakes and restarted it and reactivated 1 pedal driving. Note I was NOT using regenerative braking at the time. The car surged a few miles an hour, and in a heavy traffic scenario could have easily caused a crash.
One pedal driving switched to unavailable while driving - 24 Lyriq AWD I have seen this couple of times while driving now. I keep the one-pedal driving setting on High. I suddenly get an error on Side detection unavailable and One pedal driving turned off - use manual braking. I also feel a slight surge in acceleration while this happens, but I have been able to slow down and re-engage one pedal and it seems to work after that. I am concerned that I may bump into someone in front of me if this happens again, since it has happened a couple of times now!
One pedal driving switched to unavailable while driving - 24 Lyriq AWD I have seen this couple of times while driving now. I keep the one-pedal driving setting on High. I suddenly get an error on Side detection unavailable and One pedal driving turned off - use manual braking. I also feel a slight surge in acceleration while this happens, but I have been able to slow down and re-engage one pedal and it seems to work after that. I am concerned that I may bump into someone in front of me if this happens again, since it has happened a couple of times now!
While driving the car on 2 separate occasions, the breaks failed and the car would not stop completely. Twice I have taken the car to the dealer to be repaired and the car is currently at the dealer.
While driving the car on 2 separate occasions, the breaks failed and the car would not stop completely. Twice I have taken the car to the dealer to be repaired and the car is currently at the dealer.
- Software failure resulted in loss of steering control, speed control, and brakes became unavailable. I was on highway car was at 65 mph and then I got a bunch of error messages mentioned below- 1) Steering assist not available 2) AWD is disabled 3) Headlamps not available 4)Service brake assist And then I was not able to brake the car, and steering became highly unresponsive. I took my foot of gas and let the car roll for 1 mile before stopping safely on shoulder, from where I called Cadillac for support (they towed the car back), since error didn't resolve after stopping or rebooting the car. I took screenshot of these errors after stopping and attached them in this email. - Yes it put safety of me, my passenger, and other vehicles at risk, loss speed and steering control you have cause me to hit any other car. - Yes problem is reported to manufacturer, car is in service. - Vehicle is with Service, since no one got hurt, we didn't involve police. - No prior message or warnings we recieved, all errors come as soon as the issues appear.
- Software failure resulted in loss of steering control, speed control, and brakes became unavailable. I was on highway car was at 65 mph and then I got a bunch of error messages mentioned below- 1) Steering assist not available 2) AWD is disabled 3) Headlamps not available 4)Service brake assist And then I was not able to brake the car, and steering became highly unresponsive. I took my foot of gas and let the car roll for 1 mile before stopping safely on shoulder, from where I called Cadillac for support (they towed the car back), since error didn't resolve after stopping or rebooting the car. I took screenshot of these errors after stopping and attached them in this email. - Yes it put safety of me, my passenger, and other vehicles at risk, loss speed and steering control you have cause me to hit any other car. - Yes problem is reported to manufacturer, car is in service. - Vehicle is with Service, since no one got hurt, we didn't involve police. - No prior message or warnings we recieved, all errors come as soon as the issues appear.
When it rains, just a steady rain, not a downpour, the vehicle slams on the brakes trying to back up. It literally took 3-4 minutes to back out of the driveway. I was also in a parking lot trying to back out and the same issue which created a significant safety hazard with other vehicles. Research online indicates this is not an isolated issue.
When it rains, just a steady rain, not a downpour, the vehicle slams on the brakes trying to back up. It literally took 3-4 minutes to back out of the driveway. I was also in a parking lot trying to back out and the same issue which created a significant safety hazard with other vehicles. Research online indicates this is not an isolated issue.
On [XXX], my wife was driving our 2024 Cadillac Lyriq RWD (VIN: [XXX] ) in stop-and-go traffic on [XXX] at 5-10 MPH. She was maintaining a safe distance when the truck ahead suddenly stopped. She pressed the brakes firmly, but the vehicle failed to stop, resulting in a collision. Despite full brake application, the car did not stop as expected. The Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) and Forward Collision Alert (FCA) systems did not activate. No alerts or braking assistance occurred, even though these safety features were enabled. Her passenger witnessed her screaming that the brakes were not stopping the car. The crash caused front bumper damage, and a police report was filed. Investigation & GM’s Response GM inspected the vehicle but refuses to provide testing details. The Crash Data Report does not show any recorded braking event or safety activation, despite my wife pressing the brakes. GM has not explained: Why the brakes failed to stop the vehicle. Why AEB and FCA did not activate. Why no braking data was recorded despite the collision. Safety Concerns My wife is now afraid to drive the vehicle and refuses to continue driving it after repairs. I may be forced to break my lease or sell the car due to this serious safety concern. This raises major safety risks for other Cadillac Lyriq owners, especially with known braking-related recalls on 2023 and 2024 models. Request for Investigation I urge NHTSA to: Investigate braking system failures in the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. Review AEB and FCA non-activation during low-speed collisions. Determine whether GM is withholding data or failing to acknowledge a defect. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
On [XXX], my wife was driving our 2024 Cadillac Lyriq RWD (VIN: [XXX] ) in stop-and-go traffic on [XXX] at 5-10 MPH. She was maintaining a safe distance when the truck ahead suddenly stopped. She pressed the brakes firmly, but the vehicle failed to stop, resulting in a collision. Despite full brake application, the car did not stop as expected. The Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) and Forward Collision Alert (FCA) systems did not activate. No alerts or braking assistance occurred, even though these safety features were enabled. Her passenger witnessed her screaming that the brakes were not stopping the car. The crash caused front bumper damage, and a police report was filed. Investigation & GM’s Response GM inspected the vehicle but refuses to provide testing details. The Crash Data Report does not show any recorded braking event or safety activation, despite my wife pressing the brakes. GM has not explained: Why the brakes failed to stop the vehicle. Why AEB and FCA did not activate. Why no braking data was recorded despite the collision. Safety Concerns My wife is now afraid to drive the vehicle and refuses to continue driving it after repairs. I may be forced to break my lease or sell the car due to this serious safety concern. This raises major safety risks for other Cadillac Lyriq owners, especially with known braking-related recalls on 2023 and 2024 models. Request for Investigation I urge NHTSA to: Investigate braking system failures in the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. Review AEB and FCA non-activation during low-speed collisions. Determine whether GM is withholding data or failing to acknowledge a defect. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
See attached document for complaint.
See attached document for complaint.
While driving through Wisconsin on [XXX] with Super Cruise activated in 70MPH traffic the car provided me with driver's side collision warning failure notice and then a forward collision warning failure notice, but the car continued to be operating normally. A short time later a brakes overheating warning came on while the car still seemed to be operating normally and maintaining speed. I immediately disengaged the cruise control to check out the situation and the car instantly locked on the brakes, and we could see smoke and smell the burning brakes. I pulled to car to the side of the road, and we exited the car concerned there might be a fire coming from one of the 4 smoking wheels. The rotors were red hot. We remained a safe distance from the car until the brakes stopped smoking. After it appeared safe, I reentered the car and determined the brakes (parking brakes) were fully engaged and the car would not move. We contacted OnStar for assistance and waited. After a significant time (it seemed like quite a while) I suddenly heard the sound of the parking brakes electrically releasing. Shortly after that I started and tested the car again and it would move so we slowly drove it off the busy interstate to the next exit a short distance away and continued working with OnStar to obtain a tow to a Cadillac dealership. After working with OnStar for several hours and determining that there would most likely be no tow truck coming, we decided to test drive the car around the area now that the brakes had cooled off. We ended up renting a 'safety' car that my wife would drive, and I would try to drive the car back to Minnesota to our dealer. The car operated normally for the drive home, but we did not use any cruise control just in case. It was my belief that a system communication issue told the brakes to engage and that since the Super Cruise was engage the motors just added more power to over-come the drag on the brakes until they over heated. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AC
While driving through Wisconsin on [XXX] with Super Cruise activated in 70MPH traffic the car provided me with driver's side collision warning failure notice and then a forward collision warning failure notice, but the car continued to be operating normally. A short time later a brakes overheating warning came on while the car still seemed to be operating normally and maintaining speed. I immediately disengaged the cruise control to check out the situation and the car instantly locked on the brakes, and we could see smoke and smell the burning brakes. I pulled to car to the side of the road, and we exited the car concerned there might be a fire coming from one of the 4 smoking wheels. The rotors were red hot. We remained a safe distance from the car until the brakes stopped smoking. After it appeared safe, I reentered the car and determined the brakes (parking brakes) were fully engaged and the car would not move. We contacted OnStar for assistance and waited. After a significant time (it seemed like quite a while) I suddenly heard the sound of the parking brakes electrically releasing. Shortly after that I started and tested the car again and it would move so we slowly drove it off the busy interstate to the next exit a short distance away and continued working with OnStar to obtain a tow to a Cadillac dealership. After working with OnStar for several hours and determining that there would most likely be no tow truck coming, we decided to test drive the car around the area now that the brakes had cooled off. We ended up renting a 'safety' car that my wife would drive, and I would try to drive the car back to Minnesota to our dealer. The car operated normally for the drive home, but we did not use any cruise control just in case. It was my belief that a system communication issue told the brakes to engage and that since the Super Cruise was engage the motors just added more power to over-come the drag on the brakes until they over heated. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AC
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated while driving at approximately 3 MPH as she was entering her garage to park the vehicle, she depressed the brake pedal, however, the vehicle continued forward and crashed into a tool chest located at the back of the garage wall. The contact stated that the front of the grill and the front bumper were damaged and had to be replaced. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that failure reoccurred when she was parking the vehicle in a parking lot. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer, where it was diagnosed and determined that the ABS system had failed and caused a loss of braking ability. The contact was advised by the dealer that the failure was related to NHTSA Campaign Number: 24V589000 (Service Brakes, Hydraulic). The contact had the recall completed at that time. The manufacturer was informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 3,000.
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated while driving at approximately 3 MPH as she was entering her garage to park the vehicle, she depressed the brake pedal, however, the vehicle continued forward and crashed into a tool chest located at the back of the garage wall. The contact stated that the front of the grill and the front bumper were damaged and had to be replaced. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that failure reoccurred when she was parking the vehicle in a parking lot. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer, where it was diagnosed and determined that the ABS system had failed and caused a loss of braking ability. The contact was advised by the dealer that the failure was related to NHTSA Campaign Number: 24V589000 (Service Brakes, Hydraulic). The contact had the recall completed at that time. The manufacturer was informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 3,000.
The steering wheels sometimes don’t control the wheel and it is wobble.
The steering wheels sometimes don’t control the wheel and it is wobble.
When approaching a red light at 5-10mph, I engaged the brakes, but the brakes did not work and the automatic breaking didn't work either, leading me to rear end the car in front of me. There were no prior warnings lights or notices, and the breaks were working properly before and after the accident. The car was towed to the dealership for inspection, but they could not find anything wrong and have contacted GM for further inspection.
When approaching a red light at 5-10mph, I engaged the brakes, but the brakes did not work and the automatic breaking didn't work either, leading me to rear end the car in front of me. There were no prior warnings lights or notices, and the breaks were working properly before and after the accident. The car was towed to the dealership for inspection, but they could not find anything wrong and have contacted GM for further inspection.
I was driving the car on the turnpike and out of nowhere the rear collision system went offline and the automatic breaking was triggered while I was going 70 mph in rush hour. The brakes started to smoke and smell and the the warning of ‘breaks overheating. do not drive. call service’ happened. I proceeded to narrowly avoid many cars on the road by having to cross three lanes of traffic over to the shoulder and the car was fully smoking, I quickly turned it off I got out and stepped away. After some time when I felt safe returning to the vehicle I turned it back on and was still showing breaks were overheated message and then was forced to get the car towed and take an Uber home. The vehicle is only 2 months old with ~3300 miles on it. The vehicle is currently sitting at the closest dealership to the event and they are unable to work on it due to a lack of EV service provided there and they told me they are unable to have it moved to the dealership I purchased it at.
I was driving the car on the turnpike and out of nowhere the rear collision system went offline and the automatic breaking was triggered while I was going 70 mph in rush hour. The brakes started to smoke and smell and the the warning of ‘breaks overheating. do not drive. call service’ happened. I proceeded to narrowly avoid many cars on the road by having to cross three lanes of traffic over to the shoulder and the car was fully smoking, I quickly turned it off I got out and stepped away. After some time when I felt safe returning to the vehicle I turned it back on and was still showing breaks were overheated message and then was forced to get the car towed and take an Uber home. The vehicle is only 2 months old with ~3300 miles on it. The vehicle is currently sitting at the closest dealership to the event and they are unable to work on it due to a lack of EV service provided there and they told me they are unable to have it moved to the dealership I purchased it at.
As I approached a stop sign and hit the brake the car did not stop. I pounded on the brake but there was no response at all; it just coasted forward. The car continued to move and hit the car in front of me stopped at the stop sign. That car, a Nissan Rogue, had no damage. I was barely moving but the plastic sheet in the front of the Lyriq was cracked.
As I approached a stop sign and hit the brake the car did not stop. I pounded on the brake but there was no response at all; it just coasted forward. The car continued to move and hit the car in front of me stopped at the stop sign. That car, a Nissan Rogue, had no damage. I was barely moving but the plastic sheet in the front of the Lyriq was cracked.
There was “Brake System Failure” message on the EV’s digital display. It happened 3 times in less than a month. When it happened, I had to apply the break very hard. Otherwise, the car would not stop completely and would not hit the car in front. Top speed is limited 43 mph so I could not drive it on freeway.
There was “Brake System Failure” message on the EV’s digital display. It happened 3 times in less than a month. When it happened, I had to apply the break very hard. Otherwise, the car would not stop completely and would not hit the car in front. Top speed is limited 43 mph so I could not drive it on freeway.
Without warning and while driving this vehicle on expressway, I've received the following notifications several times: "Brake Failure" (car brakes on its own); "Service Stability and Auto Hold"; and "High Voltage" and Battery. Brakes, speed, steering, parking systems and camera do not work properly. Car's capacity to drive vehicle safely is reduced significantly - speed to drive car is immediately reduced and is limited without warning. Car shakes passengers violently (whiplash) when it believes there are people or objects in its path when there is nothing there and does not work properly when pedestrians are around the vehicle. During the incidents both my safety and other drivers safety are at risk - I am afraid to drive this vehicle although the dealership has indicated they have corrected the errors.Vehicle purchased 23 Oct - problems began around 2300 miles and have continued thru 4200 miles.
Without warning and while driving this vehicle on expressway, I've received the following notifications several times: "Brake Failure" (car brakes on its own); "Service Stability and Auto Hold"; and "High Voltage" and Battery. Brakes, speed, steering, parking systems and camera do not work properly. Car's capacity to drive vehicle safely is reduced significantly - speed to drive car is immediately reduced and is limited without warning. Car shakes passengers violently (whiplash) when it believes there are people or objects in its path when there is nothing there and does not work properly when pedestrians are around the vehicle. During the incidents both my safety and other drivers safety are at risk - I am afraid to drive this vehicle although the dealership has indicated they have corrected the errors.Vehicle purchased 23 Oct - problems began around 2300 miles and have continued thru 4200 miles.
When in reverse abrupt automatic braking occurs. Safety hazard with abrupt stop around other vehicles, hard braking causes driver and passenger to pitch forward. No warning. Automatic Braking disabled, sensors checked, settings adjusted by dealer. Dealer says there is nothing they can do. General Motors contacted but no action taken to date.
When in reverse abrupt automatic braking occurs. Safety hazard with abrupt stop around other vehicles, hard braking causes driver and passenger to pitch forward. No warning. Automatic Braking disabled, sensors checked, settings adjusted by dealer. Dealer says there is nothing they can do. General Motors contacted but no action taken to date.
My 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ generated the following High Voltage Battery fault codes via On-Demand Diagnostic: U2B4A, U2B4D, U2B50, U2B53, U2B56, U2B59, U2B5C, U2B5F, U2B62, U2B65, U2B68 — all under module VIC - Lithium-Ion Battery. Multiple codes are flagged "Service Right Away" indicating an active fault in the high voltage propulsion battery system. I brought the vehicle to Lindsay Cadillac, Alexandria VA [XXX] ) on [INSERT DROP-OFF DATE]. As of today [INSERT TODAY'S DATE], the vehicle has been sitting at the dealership for [X] days with ZERO repair action taken. The service manager has stated he does not know what to do, has no timeline, and cannot provide any answers. GM Technical Service Bulletins PIP6009B and 25-NA-044 specifically cover these exact DTCs and provide a documented repair procedure. The dealer has failed to follow or initiate this procedure. No loaner vehicle was provided despite this being a warranty repair on inoperative vehicle. I have been forced to rent a vehicle at $125/day out of pocket. I have an open Cadillac Concierge case number [93707662 #]. Cadillac Concierge was unable to reach the dealer's service department by phone. I have escalated in writing to GM's executive office including [XXX] and [XXX] with no resolution. This is a high voltage battery fault on an all-electric vehicle flagged as "Service Right Away" severity. The vehicle remains unrepaired, the dealer is unresponsive, and GM's own customer service cannot reach the dealer. This represents both a safety concern and a complete failure of the warranty service obligation. I am requesting NHTSA investigation of both the underlying battery defect and the dealer's failure to act on a known TSB. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
My 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ generated the following High Voltage Battery fault codes via On-Demand Diagnostic: U2B4A, U2B4D, U2B50, U2B53, U2B56, U2B59, U2B5C, U2B5F, U2B62, U2B65, U2B68 — all under module VIC - Lithium-Ion Battery. Multiple codes are flagged "Service Right Away" indicating an active fault in the high voltage propulsion battery system. I brought the vehicle to Lindsay Cadillac, Alexandria VA [XXX] ) on [INSERT DROP-OFF DATE]. As of today [INSERT TODAY'S DATE], the vehicle has been sitting at the dealership for [X] days with ZERO repair action taken. The service manager has stated he does not know what to do, has no timeline, and cannot provide any answers. GM Technical Service Bulletins PIP6009B and 25-NA-044 specifically cover these exact DTCs and provide a documented repair procedure. The dealer has failed to follow or initiate this procedure. No loaner vehicle was provided despite this being a warranty repair on inoperative vehicle. I have been forced to rent a vehicle at $125/day out of pocket. I have an open Cadillac Concierge case number [93707662 #]. Cadillac Concierge was unable to reach the dealer's service department by phone. I have escalated in writing to GM's executive office including [XXX] and [XXX] with no resolution. This is a high voltage battery fault on an all-electric vehicle flagged as "Service Right Away" severity. The vehicle remains unrepaired, the dealer is unresponsive, and GM's own customer service cannot reach the dealer. This represents both a safety concern and a complete failure of the warranty service obligation. I am requesting NHTSA investigation of both the underlying battery defect and the dealer's failure to act on a known TSB. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The vehicle has experienced repeated failures of the infotainment and display system, including the screen going blank and displaying “no content available” while functions such as Apple CarPlay are actively in use. The issue affects the ability to control media and view system information from both the main display and steering wheel controls. The vehicle has undergone multiple repair attempts, including replacement of the human machine interface (HMI) module and radio module, as well as repeated programming. Despite these repairs, the issue continues to reoccur, including immediately after the most recent repair. The condition is intermittent and difficult to duplicate, and a field service engineer has been unable to consistently reproduce the issue. The dealership has indicated there may not be a current fix and that resolution could depend on a future software update. This ongoing failure of critical display and control systems raises safety concerns and has not been resolved despite multiple repair attempts.
The vehicle has experienced repeated failures of the infotainment and display system, including the screen going blank and displaying “no content available” while functions such as Apple CarPlay are actively in use. The issue affects the ability to control media and view system information from both the main display and steering wheel controls. The vehicle has undergone multiple repair attempts, including replacement of the human machine interface (HMI) module and radio module, as well as repeated programming. Despite these repairs, the issue continues to reoccur, including immediately after the most recent repair. The condition is intermittent and difficult to duplicate, and a field service engineer has been unable to consistently reproduce the issue. The dealership has indicated there may not be a current fix and that resolution could depend on a future software update. This ongoing failure of critical display and control systems raises safety concerns and has not been resolved despite multiple repair attempts.
We own a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV. We began experiencing safety concerns related to battery performance and overall vehicle reliability during the active bumper-to-bumper warranty period. These concerns were reported to an authorized GM dealer, Napleton Cadillac, prior to warranty expiration. Service records at Napleton Cadillac document the history of these complaints. The vehicle has been unable to process required over-the-air (OTA) software updates through GM's intended automated update process. During a dealer visit on February 17, 2026, at GM's direction, the Napleton Cadillac service technician confirmed that the vehicle had multiple open notices and that our reported concerns are consistent with known issues affecting the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq across multiple units — indicating this is not an isolated occurrence. The dealer advised that correcting the update failure would require approximately five hours of manual labor at an estimated cost of $1,250 — a cost GM has declined to cover, despite the fact that the OTA update process is the manufacturer's intended method for delivering safety-critical corrections and the failure to update is a vehicle deficiency, not a customer-caused condition. Due to these unresolved safety concerns, we have not been driving the vehicle. We do not have confidence that the vehicle is operating safely or as designed. We formally requested a repurchase from General Motors through the EV Concierge program (Case No. 87486271). That request was denied on March 14, 2026, citing two rationales: (1) the vehicle is out of warranty, and (2) system updates do not qualify for repurchase. We believe these rationales fail to account for the fact that the original safety complaints were filed during the warranty period and that the root issue is battery and system safety — not a routine software preference. We are filing this complaint to create a formal federal safety record and to request that NHTSA evaluate an investigation or recall.
We own a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV. We began experiencing safety concerns related to battery performance and overall vehicle reliability during the active bumper-to-bumper warranty period. These concerns were reported to an authorized GM dealer, Napleton Cadillac, prior to warranty expiration. Service records at Napleton Cadillac document the history of these complaints. The vehicle has been unable to process required over-the-air (OTA) software updates through GM's intended automated update process. During a dealer visit on February 17, 2026, at GM's direction, the Napleton Cadillac service technician confirmed that the vehicle had multiple open notices and that our reported concerns are consistent with known issues affecting the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq across multiple units — indicating this is not an isolated occurrence. The dealer advised that correcting the update failure would require approximately five hours of manual labor at an estimated cost of $1,250 — a cost GM has declined to cover, despite the fact that the OTA update process is the manufacturer's intended method for delivering safety-critical corrections and the failure to update is a vehicle deficiency, not a customer-caused condition. Due to these unresolved safety concerns, we have not been driving the vehicle. We do not have confidence that the vehicle is operating safely or as designed. We formally requested a repurchase from General Motors through the EV Concierge program (Case No. 87486271). That request was denied on March 14, 2026, citing two rationales: (1) the vehicle is out of warranty, and (2) system updates do not qualify for repurchase. We believe these rationales fail to account for the fact that the original safety complaints were filed during the warranty period and that the root issue is battery and system safety — not a routine software preference. We are filing this complaint to create a formal federal safety record and to request that NHTSA evaluate an investigation or recall.
I experienced a complete electrical failure in my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq that prevented access to the vehicle while an infant was inside. The incident occurred when the vehicle’s 12-volt battery system failed, causing a total loss of electrical power and rendering the vehicle completely unresponsive. As a result of this failure, all electronic entry systems stopped functioning and the exterior door handles remained in the locked position. There were no warning signs or error messages communicated from the vehicle. Because the vehicle could not be unlocked or accessed from the outside, an infant was trapped inside the vehicle for approximately 27 minutes. Cadillac has been contacted and they confirmed a faulty 12 volt battery and since then replaced the battery. The incident was recorded by home security cameras and documentation has been preserved. This event raises a serious safety concern. A failure of the 12-volt battery should not disable all methods of entry into a vehicle, particularly when the design of the Cadillac Lyriq uses electronically actuated exterior door handles that remain recessed and locked without electrical power. This creates a situation in which occupants may be trapped inside the vehicle with no reliable means for outside access. The inability to unlock or mechanically access the vehicle during a power failure presents a significant risk of injury or death, particularly in situations involving children, extreme temperatures, or medical emergencies.
I experienced a complete electrical failure in my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq that prevented access to the vehicle while an infant was inside. The incident occurred when the vehicle’s 12-volt battery system failed, causing a total loss of electrical power and rendering the vehicle completely unresponsive. As a result of this failure, all electronic entry systems stopped functioning and the exterior door handles remained in the locked position. There were no warning signs or error messages communicated from the vehicle. Because the vehicle could not be unlocked or accessed from the outside, an infant was trapped inside the vehicle for approximately 27 minutes. Cadillac has been contacted and they confirmed a faulty 12 volt battery and since then replaced the battery. The incident was recorded by home security cameras and documentation has been preserved. This event raises a serious safety concern. A failure of the 12-volt battery should not disable all methods of entry into a vehicle, particularly when the design of the Cadillac Lyriq uses electronically actuated exterior door handles that remain recessed and locked without electrical power. This creates a situation in which occupants may be trapped inside the vehicle with no reliable means for outside access. The inability to unlock or mechanically access the vehicle during a power failure presents a significant risk of injury or death, particularly in situations involving children, extreme temperatures, or medical emergencies.
Component: Electronic Stability Control / Navigation / GPS Complaint: Since the February 2026 over-the-air software update, the built-in Google Maps GPS has been severely malfunctioning. The system consistently fails to update my vehicle’s location, showing me as stationary at my home address even after driving for 30+ minutes and 20+ miles away. This is not an intermittent glitch — it renders the native navigation system completely unusable after nearly every drive. Prior to the February 2026 update, the GPS functioned perfectly. The issue began immediately following that update and has persisted despite infotainment system resets and checking for further software updates. I am aware that GM has internally acknowledged this issue via Preliminary Information bulletin PIC6644 (issued February 2026), which attributes the problem to a “software anomaly” and confirms engineering is investigating. However, no fix or timeline has been provided to customers. A GPS system that does not reflect the vehicle’s actual location is a safety concern — particularly when relying on navigation for routing, hazard awareness, or emergency response. I am filing this complaint to make sure this issue is part of the public record and to urge NHTSA to monitor the scope of this defect across 2024 Lyriq vehicles
Component: Electronic Stability Control / Navigation / GPS Complaint: Since the February 2026 over-the-air software update, the built-in Google Maps GPS has been severely malfunctioning. The system consistently fails to update my vehicle’s location, showing me as stationary at my home address even after driving for 30+ minutes and 20+ miles away. This is not an intermittent glitch — it renders the native navigation system completely unusable after nearly every drive. Prior to the February 2026 update, the GPS functioned perfectly. The issue began immediately following that update and has persisted despite infotainment system resets and checking for further software updates. I am aware that GM has internally acknowledged this issue via Preliminary Information bulletin PIC6644 (issued February 2026), which attributes the problem to a “software anomaly” and confirms engineering is investigating. However, no fix or timeline has been provided to customers. A GPS system that does not reflect the vehicle’s actual location is a safety concern — particularly when relying on navigation for routing, hazard awareness, or emergency response. I am filing this complaint to make sure this issue is part of the public record and to urge NHTSA to monitor the scope of this defect across 2024 Lyriq vehicles
While slowly turning into a parking space at approximately 1 mph (?) the vehicle unexpectedly accelerated. The vehicle mounted the curb, and struck a a parked car and hit a brick retaining wall, causing damage to both. This all happened within a few seconds and there were no warning lights or messages before or during the accident. I was not injured and there were no other people present. The police were called and inspected the damages. The insurance company was contacted due to damages. No one was in the parking lot at the time. The manufacturer was notified and will inspect the car for cause/failure.
While slowly turning into a parking space at approximately 1 mph (?) the vehicle unexpectedly accelerated. The vehicle mounted the curb, and struck a a parked car and hit a brick retaining wall, causing damage to both. This all happened within a few seconds and there were no warning lights or messages before or during the accident. I was not injured and there were no other people present. The police were called and inspected the damages. The insurance company was contacted due to damages. No one was in the parking lot at the time. The manufacturer was notified and will inspect the car for cause/failure.
After a manufacturer-initiated software/system update was performed on my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq approximately two weeks ago, the vehicle stopped charging and stopped generating heat. I brought the vehicle to Cadillac Norwood MA for diagnosis. The dealership informed me that a replacement part is needed, but the part does not currently exist and must be manufactured by General Motors. They could not provide any timeline for when the part would be available or when the vehicle would be repaired. The vehicle is being held at the dealership indefinitely. I have opened a case with Cadillac's EV Concierge and filed a formal complaint with them, but have not received a resolution or timeline. This vehicle is used professionally as a chauffeur vehicle and the inability to charge or heat the vehicle renders it completely inoperable and unsafe, particularly in Massachusetts winter conditions. A vehicle losing all charging capability and cabin heating after a software update represents a serious safety concern for EV owners
After a manufacturer-initiated software/system update was performed on my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq approximately two weeks ago, the vehicle stopped charging and stopped generating heat. I brought the vehicle to Cadillac Norwood MA for diagnosis. The dealership informed me that a replacement part is needed, but the part does not currently exist and must be manufactured by General Motors. They could not provide any timeline for when the part would be available or when the vehicle would be repaired. The vehicle is being held at the dealership indefinitely. I have opened a case with Cadillac's EV Concierge and filed a formal complaint with them, but have not received a resolution or timeline. This vehicle is used professionally as a chauffeur vehicle and the inability to charge or heat the vehicle renders it completely inoperable and unsafe, particularly in Massachusetts winter conditions. A vehicle losing all charging capability and cabin heating after a software update represents a serious safety concern for EV owners
My 2024 Cadillac EV is only 9900 miles. I was driving the car on Sunday Jan 11, 2026 with my family when we noticed smoke filled inside the cabin. My 3 children (a [XXX], a [XXX] old, and a new-born who is [XXX] old) were in the car; they inhaled the smoke. We evacuated the car and called onstar for assistance - who towed the car. The smoke originated from the tailgate of the car. Alarmingly, just 3 days before this incident (Jan 8, 2026), I took the car to the local Cadillac dealership to complain about water intrusion in the left taillight that is in the liftgate. The service advisor created a repair order and sent me back saying it would take 10 days to arrive. Upon my specific inquiry, the advisor stated the car was safe to drive and assured me that I would not get a ticket. Since the event (5 days later) it was confirmed by the service advisor that the same water intrusion event lead to the electrical fire that burned a connector, a module, and multiple wiring components causing the fire. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
My 2024 Cadillac EV is only 9900 miles. I was driving the car on Sunday Jan 11, 2026 with my family when we noticed smoke filled inside the cabin. My 3 children (a [XXX], a [XXX] old, and a new-born who is [XXX] old) were in the car; they inhaled the smoke. We evacuated the car and called onstar for assistance - who towed the car. The smoke originated from the tailgate of the car. Alarmingly, just 3 days before this incident (Jan 8, 2026), I took the car to the local Cadillac dealership to complain about water intrusion in the left taillight that is in the liftgate. The service advisor created a repair order and sent me back saying it would take 10 days to arrive. Upon my specific inquiry, the advisor stated the car was safe to drive and assured me that I would not get a ticket. Since the event (5 days later) it was confirmed by the service advisor that the same water intrusion event lead to the electrical fire that burned a connector, a module, and multiple wiring components causing the fire. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN UNDER RECALL SINCE JUNE 2025. WE HAVE HAD THE DEALER DO THE RECALL, HAD OVER THE AIR UPDATES AND IT STILL CAUSES ALL THE ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM SCREEN TO GO BLACK AND DISABLES THEM. DEALER MSYATES ALL RECALLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN UNDER RECALL SINCE JUNE 2025. WE HAVE HAD THE DEALER DO THE RECALL, HAD OVER THE AIR UPDATES AND IT STILL CAUSES ALL THE ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM SCREEN TO GO BLACK AND DISABLES THEM. DEALER MSYATES ALL RECALLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
on Sept 23, 2025, I was rear ended by a driver going between 50-60 mph. I am concerned that some safety features were potentially not working at the time of the incident. I will detail the information below: Background / Original Service Issue: When I initially brought my vehicle to Titus-Will Chevrolet GMC Cadillac for service, I observed that multiple critical safety systems were nonfunctional, including, but not limited to: Forward collision alert sensor All cameras (rear, front, top down) Blind zone steering assist Lane departure warning and other associated warning sensors The dealership kept my car for two days and then informed me that a "module" needed to be ordered for repair, but stated that the vehicle was considered “drivable” and would call me when the part came in. I noticed some of the safety features had resumed working, however some were still non-functional. At no point was I told there were any potential safety risks, nor which safety systems were still not functional. I was not given any paperwork, as they were holding it until the module came in. Crash Event: On 09/23/2025 at 5:37 pm, I was involved in a crash. At the time of impact: The forward collision alert sensor did not function I received no warning of the impending collision No airbags deployed. This may have been directly related to the previously identified and unrepaired safety system issues.
on Sept 23, 2025, I was rear ended by a driver going between 50-60 mph. I am concerned that some safety features were potentially not working at the time of the incident. I will detail the information below: Background / Original Service Issue: When I initially brought my vehicle to Titus-Will Chevrolet GMC Cadillac for service, I observed that multiple critical safety systems were nonfunctional, including, but not limited to: Forward collision alert sensor All cameras (rear, front, top down) Blind zone steering assist Lane departure warning and other associated warning sensors The dealership kept my car for two days and then informed me that a "module" needed to be ordered for repair, but stated that the vehicle was considered “drivable” and would call me when the part came in. I noticed some of the safety features had resumed working, however some were still non-functional. At no point was I told there were any potential safety risks, nor which safety systems were still not functional. I was not given any paperwork, as they were holding it until the module came in. Crash Event: On 09/23/2025 at 5:37 pm, I was involved in a crash. At the time of impact: The forward collision alert sensor did not function I received no warning of the impending collision No airbags deployed. This may have been directly related to the previously identified and unrepaired safety system issues.
At least 10 times over the past three months the vehicle’s feature of one pedal driving disengages without a reason or code. When the this happens the vehicle accelerates rapidly. This has happened on local streets and on the highway and often results in a near miss collision. I am concerned this will result in a serious injury or death.
At least 10 times over the past three months the vehicle’s feature of one pedal driving disengages without a reason or code. When the this happens the vehicle accelerates rapidly. This has happened on local streets and on the highway and often results in a near miss collision. I am concerned this will result in a serious injury or death.
While driving in one-pedal driving mode at the high setting, an error message appeared and one-pedal driving suddenly shut off and switched to a more standard drive mode where engine braking is disengaged. This happened while drive was engaged and stopped at a red light. The car briefly lurched forward and the car engaged an emergency brake to prevent the car from rolling into the vehicle in front of me. This incident was unpredictable and resulted in an unexpected change to the drive mode I had selected which could have lead to a collision.
While driving in one-pedal driving mode at the high setting, an error message appeared and one-pedal driving suddenly shut off and switched to a more standard drive mode where engine braking is disengaged. This happened while drive was engaged and stopped at a red light. The car briefly lurched forward and the car engaged an emergency brake to prevent the car from rolling into the vehicle in front of me. This incident was unpredictable and resulted in an unexpected change to the drive mode I had selected which could have lead to a collision.
The contact owns a 2023 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing and proceeding to make a U-turn, he crashed into a steel guardrail. The automatic braking system did not engage. There was no audible or visual alert or warning provided by the system. There was no injury, police report, airbag deployment, or fire. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer. After twelve days, the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted, who confirmed the vehicle had functioned as designed. The failure mileage was 8,600.
The contact owns a 2023 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing and proceeding to make a U-turn, he crashed into a steel guardrail. The automatic braking system did not engage. There was no audible or visual alert or warning provided by the system. There was no injury, police report, airbag deployment, or fire. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer. After twelve days, the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted, who confirmed the vehicle had functioned as designed. The failure mileage was 8,600.
1-Pedal Drive Turns Itself Off / Disengages Itself while Driving.
1-Pedal Drive Turns Itself Off / Disengages Itself while Driving.
Recall 252500680 GM claims closed and downloaded OTA. NO such download ever occured per my vehicle history as displayed. How many thousands of vehicles are being improperly closed without updating due to GM incompetance.
Recall 252500680 GM claims closed and downloaded OTA. NO such download ever occured per my vehicle history as displayed. How many thousands of vehicles are being improperly closed without updating due to GM incompetance.
Since a recent software update, vehicle will unexpectedly give multiple error codes, and disengage “one-pedal driving” mode. This happened recently when coming to a stop at a traffic light behind another vehicle. When coming to a gradual one-pedal stop, the one pedal driving mode unexpectedly disengaged, causing me to almost hit the vehicle in front of me. This error has occurred 5-6 times in the past 3 months.
Since a recent software update, vehicle will unexpectedly give multiple error codes, and disengage “one-pedal driving” mode. This happened recently when coming to a stop at a traffic light behind another vehicle. When coming to a gradual one-pedal stop, the one pedal driving mode unexpectedly disengaged, causing me to almost hit the vehicle in front of me. This error has occurred 5-6 times in the past 3 months.
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that upon engaging the drive mode of the vehicle, the vehicle unintendedly switched back to parking mode. The vehicle was towed to the dealer, where an unknown repair was performed, and the vehicle was repaired. Additionally, the dealer informed the contact that the VIN was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V356000 (Equipment, Electrical System). The contact stated after the dealer performed the recall repair, the vehicle failed to restart. The dealer informed the contact that the manufacturer needed to provide additional remedy to correct the failure. The dealer referred the contact to the manufacturer for assistance. The manufacturer was contacted and referred the contact to the dealer for assistance. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 29,488. Parts distribution disconnect.
The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that upon engaging the drive mode of the vehicle, the vehicle unintendedly switched back to parking mode. The vehicle was towed to the dealer, where an unknown repair was performed, and the vehicle was repaired. Additionally, the dealer informed the contact that the VIN was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V356000 (Equipment, Electrical System). The contact stated after the dealer performed the recall repair, the vehicle failed to restart. The dealer informed the contact that the manufacturer needed to provide additional remedy to correct the failure. The dealer referred the contact to the manufacturer for assistance. The manufacturer was contacted and referred the contact to the dealer for assistance. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 29,488. Parts distribution disconnect.
Hi, this vehicle is owned by Surreal Development LLC. A company whom reverse engineers vehicle. GM has an issue in their Cadillac Lyriq's which causes a complete failure of the vehicle's communication systems without warning while driving. This issue appears to affect all Global B vehicles but it is most severe in vehicles with one pedal driving (Sierra EV, Lyriq, Blazer EV, Optiq, Silverado EV, Equinox EV, etc...) The error is likely within the vehicle's Serial Data Gateway Control Module but it is unclear. The vehicle recovers from the communication quickly (within seconds) but it causes long term adverse affects for that driving period. 1. The vehicle will light up with warnings (Service Traction Control, disengage super cruise, disengage ACC, etc...) 2. The driver's pedal will go into safety mode. 3. A "Service High Voltage" system warning may or may not appear. The safety concern is mostly in #2. When this happens it is very jarring to the driver as it drastically changes how the vehicle responds. While the vehicle may state one pedal driving is disabled many times it still indicates it is on within the controls (likely due to an error in the compounded communication fault). This can lead to the driver rear ending the vehicle in front of them or rolling over. The fault does not correct itself until the vehicle resets (powers off/on). The issue is common and affects many owners of the Cadillac Lyriq. The only diagnostic data we see are communication faults across many modules.
Hi, this vehicle is owned by Surreal Development LLC. A company whom reverse engineers vehicle. GM has an issue in their Cadillac Lyriq's which causes a complete failure of the vehicle's communication systems without warning while driving. This issue appears to affect all Global B vehicles but it is most severe in vehicles with one pedal driving (Sierra EV, Lyriq, Blazer EV, Optiq, Silverado EV, Equinox EV, etc...) The error is likely within the vehicle's Serial Data Gateway Control Module but it is unclear. The vehicle recovers from the communication quickly (within seconds) but it causes long term adverse affects for that driving period. 1. The vehicle will light up with warnings (Service Traction Control, disengage super cruise, disengage ACC, etc...) 2. The driver's pedal will go into safety mode. 3. A "Service High Voltage" system warning may or may not appear. The safety concern is mostly in #2. When this happens it is very jarring to the driver as it drastically changes how the vehicle responds. While the vehicle may state one pedal driving is disabled many times it still indicates it is on within the controls (likely due to an error in the compounded communication fault). This can lead to the driver rear ending the vehicle in front of them or rolling over. The fault does not correct itself until the vehicle resets (powers off/on). The issue is common and affects many owners of the Cadillac Lyriq. The only diagnostic data we see are communication faults across many modules.
While driving my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq in rolling traffic, the vehicle abruptly engaged the brakes without warning or cause. The braking was so forceful I initially thought I had been rear-ended. Once the braking event ended, I began to accelerate—only to discover the vehicle had shifted into reverse without any input from me. This resulted in a rear-end collision. There were no alerts or dashboard warnings to indicate the gear change. I believe this may be related to a malfunction in the automatic emergency braking system or the shift-by-wire controller. This behavior presents a serious safety hazard and must be investigated. I have filed a report with Cadillac and will be taking the vehicle to a dealership for diagnostics and data log review.
While driving my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq in rolling traffic, the vehicle abruptly engaged the brakes without warning or cause. The braking was so forceful I initially thought I had been rear-ended. Once the braking event ended, I began to accelerate—only to discover the vehicle had shifted into reverse without any input from me. This resulted in a rear-end collision. There were no alerts or dashboard warnings to indicate the gear change. I believe this may be related to a malfunction in the automatic emergency braking system or the shift-by-wire controller. This behavior presents a serious safety hazard and must be investigated. I have filed a report with Cadillac and will be taking the vehicle to a dealership for diagnostics and data log review.
This is an update to my original NHTSA complaint submitted on May 5, 2025 (complaint number 11658852), regarding a complete electrical failure in a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. While parked in a garage, the vehicle experienced a full shutdown—rendering all systems inoperable, including the door locks and windows. Most alarmingly, a [XXX] child was trapped in the back seat due to the doors being electronically locked and unresponsive. The dealership has since diagnosed the failure as a cable routed improperly near the steering column that had rubbed against a component and snapped. This severed connection resulted in the complete loss of vehicle power and emergency functions. Since that time, I have discovered multiple similar reports from other Lyriq owners online describing full system shutdowns, locked doors, and failures to start—many of which are shared on public forums such as Reddit [XXX] ). This suggests that this may not be an isolated case but rather a potential systemic defect in the Lyriq's wiring harness design or electrical architecture. I am extremely concerned that this failure mode could occur while driving, particularly at highway speeds, and would result in loss of steering, braking assist, and emergency exit options. I urge the NHTSA to investigate this issue further to determine whether a recall or manufacturer communication is appropriate. This vehicle is currently with the dealership, and I have refused delivery until GM provides formal safety assurances. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
This is an update to my original NHTSA complaint submitted on May 5, 2025 (complaint number 11658852), regarding a complete electrical failure in a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. While parked in a garage, the vehicle experienced a full shutdown—rendering all systems inoperable, including the door locks and windows. Most alarmingly, a [XXX] child was trapped in the back seat due to the doors being electronically locked and unresponsive. The dealership has since diagnosed the failure as a cable routed improperly near the steering column that had rubbed against a component and snapped. This severed connection resulted in the complete loss of vehicle power and emergency functions. Since that time, I have discovered multiple similar reports from other Lyriq owners online describing full system shutdowns, locked doors, and failures to start—many of which are shared on public forums such as Reddit [XXX] ). This suggests that this may not be an isolated case but rather a potential systemic defect in the Lyriq's wiring harness design or electrical architecture. I am extremely concerned that this failure mode could occur while driving, particularly at highway speeds, and would result in loss of steering, braking assist, and emergency exit options. I urge the NHTSA to investigate this issue further to determine whether a recall or manufacturer communication is appropriate. This vehicle is currently with the dealership, and I have refused delivery until GM provides formal safety assurances. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The main driving display in my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq has faulty software or light sensor calibration - the vehicle automatically dims the screen (including the speedometer) to unreadably low levels, is extremely slow to respond to changing lighting conditions and time of day (the display changes between day and night modes automatically but is constantly confused by lighting conditions). This happens most often at dawn and dusk. I will be driving in bright sunlight with the sun glaring in my eyes, and the screen will think it's night and be dimmed way down to about 20% brightness. Customers have no way of overriding this. There is no setting to disable automatic brightness, and some customers have taken the time to manually unplug the daylight sensor on the dash to resolve their issue. Additionally, the system is extremely sensitive to going under overpasses, which will immediately dim the entire system to about 20% brightness and stay that way for a long time after returning to bright sunlight. This also happens when pulling into my garage, where the display dims down so low that I am unable to see the safety cameras around the vehicle in order to park my vehicle correctly. GM has been made aware of this issue, and they've been aware of it for years. I've spoken to GM directly, and they say, "a fix is coming," but it's been years and nothing has been done. They've issued multiple software updates, none of which address the problem so far. Subsequently released vehicles, like the Optiq, have this issue resolved. GM knows how to fix it, and that's an issue; they just do nothing about it. This is a very well-known, very widespread issue for other Lyriq owners. You can find chat chains on Reddit discussing this issue, and even one where multiple owners talk about starting a class action case on it as it involves vehicle safety. I'm attaching photos of what my display looks like when the sun is out in the morning. It displays the same behavior at dusk.
The main driving display in my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq has faulty software or light sensor calibration - the vehicle automatically dims the screen (including the speedometer) to unreadably low levels, is extremely slow to respond to changing lighting conditions and time of day (the display changes between day and night modes automatically but is constantly confused by lighting conditions). This happens most often at dawn and dusk. I will be driving in bright sunlight with the sun glaring in my eyes, and the screen will think it's night and be dimmed way down to about 20% brightness. Customers have no way of overriding this. There is no setting to disable automatic brightness, and some customers have taken the time to manually unplug the daylight sensor on the dash to resolve their issue. Additionally, the system is extremely sensitive to going under overpasses, which will immediately dim the entire system to about 20% brightness and stay that way for a long time after returning to bright sunlight. This also happens when pulling into my garage, where the display dims down so low that I am unable to see the safety cameras around the vehicle in order to park my vehicle correctly. GM has been made aware of this issue, and they've been aware of it for years. I've spoken to GM directly, and they say, "a fix is coming," but it's been years and nothing has been done. They've issued multiple software updates, none of which address the problem so far. Subsequently released vehicles, like the Optiq, have this issue resolved. GM knows how to fix it, and that's an issue; they just do nothing about it. This is a very well-known, very widespread issue for other Lyriq owners. You can find chat chains on Reddit discussing this issue, and even one where multiple owners talk about starting a class action case on it as it involves vehicle safety. I'm attaching photos of what my display looks like when the sun is out in the morning. It displays the same behavior at dusk.
We were exiting a parking garage when the car suddenly slammed the brakes on in the path of traffic and lost all electrical power. We could not get the car to turn back on or even get it in neutral to move it out of the path of traffic. Our [XXX] old got locked in the car because the car had zero electric power and someone helped us figure out how to unlock the car with the physical key. We were stuck for four hours because no one could figure out how to get the car out of the garage. If this had happened going at a high speed this could have caused a deadly crash, and it happened without any warning. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
We were exiting a parking garage when the car suddenly slammed the brakes on in the path of traffic and lost all electrical power. We could not get the car to turn back on or even get it in neutral to move it out of the path of traffic. Our [XXX] old got locked in the car because the car had zero electric power and someone helped us figure out how to unlock the car with the physical key. We were stuck for four hours because no one could figure out how to get the car out of the garage. If this had happened going at a high speed this could have caused a deadly crash, and it happened without any warning. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
When driving, the infotainment screen glitched. This also affected the main instrument cluster containing information like speed, and inhibited any ability to control certain functions like the headlights. While the infotainment screen was scrambled, this was not a perceived safety issue [except that cameras could not be seen] However, the main instrument cluster was concerning. Correct speed, gear position, blinkers, etc were not shown or delayed. [e.g. when going approx 30 mph, the cluster stated approx 15 mph]
When driving, the infotainment screen glitched. This also affected the main instrument cluster containing information like speed, and inhibited any ability to control certain functions like the headlights. While the infotainment screen was scrambled, this was not a perceived safety issue [except that cameras could not be seen] However, the main instrument cluster was concerning. Correct speed, gear position, blinkers, etc were not shown or delayed. [e.g. when going approx 30 mph, the cluster stated approx 15 mph]
AC compressor severe noise like a chopper.
AC compressor severe noise like a chopper.
The phone charging cradle, Bluetooth, wifi, and Radio are getting disconnected, repair made 3-4 times, and still the same problem, also dashboard screen getting dark or disconnected while driving the car. On 01/09 2025, 10 pm I connected to charge the battery and it didn't charge the whole night when I started the car, and heard a big bang like a bomb blew the electrical battery in my garage, thank god I didn't get injured or damage to my garage/home. I took the 5th time to the dealer and asked General Moror to buy back the car. I have filed a written complaint with BBB OF NEW JERSEY and Lemon Law. Thank god I wasn't driving the car on highway when the car battery blew up otherwise I would have or other people would have gotten injured or dead.
The phone charging cradle, Bluetooth, wifi, and Radio are getting disconnected, repair made 3-4 times, and still the same problem, also dashboard screen getting dark or disconnected while driving the car. On 01/09 2025, 10 pm I connected to charge the battery and it didn't charge the whole night when I started the car, and heard a big bang like a bomb blew the electrical battery in my garage, thank god I didn't get injured or damage to my garage/home. I took the 5th time to the dealer and asked General Moror to buy back the car. I have filed a written complaint with BBB OF NEW JERSEY and Lemon Law. Thank god I wasn't driving the car on highway when the car battery blew up otherwise I would have or other people would have gotten injured or dead.
Showing top 50 of 106 complaints (sorted by severity, most recent first). Full records available via NHTSA ODI search.
What Owners Are Saying
"41M Daily drive an AWD Lux 2… about 8k miles had 1 misaligned panel and just tire rotation at 7500 miles been a dream … love it and can’t wait to either get Lyriq V or Vistiq when the lease is up in a year …"
"Just traded my 2020 Tesla Model Y for a 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ I know someone out there is in the market for a used Tesla Model Y and might find this helpful so I wanted to share my experience...and ultimately why I traded my Model Y in for a 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ RWD Luxury 1 package (no super cruise). First of all, the Model Y is a great compact SUV. The things I loved most about mine were: 1) Its size and use of space- The frunk is huge, the sub trunk I could fit a Yeti 35 cooler under, the trunk space was solid, and my leg room in the front and back seats was as good as any vehicle in its class (I am 6 foot 5 so it matters) 2) The driving experience- Double edge sword coming here. This car was QUICK, loved that. The suspension Tesla used here has changed in recent year and for good reason, you could feel every little bump which sucked for daily driving in a city where potholes and road imperfections are abundant. Again, if you get a newer year or non performance Tesla, you will have a different experience. That being said, if I was trying to whip the car around and have fun with it, feeling every inch of the road was great. 3) The sound system- One of the best I have ever heard stock from the factory. 4) Customization- So many 3rd party accessories if you want to take your Model Y and add onto it since it comes so similar to everyone else's from the factory 5) The charging exprience- This is by far the most important thing for most people considering buying an EV. The Tesla super charging network is by far the best and it's not even close. They are extremely reliable, can't say the same for the non Tesla Superchargers out there (see below) 6) Full Self Driving- It really is incredible how much it has progressed. I am still skeptical it will ever be level 3 or level 4, but it's very useful. Be careful though because it still makes mistakes. So why did I trade my beloved Tesla Model Y in for a Cadillac LYRIQ? 1) Ride quality/Cabin Noise- I mostly bought my Model Y Performance because I got a great deal on it and wanted a Tesla SUV. I didn't need the performance aspect of the car and consistently wished I didn't hear so much road noise (which Tesla has improved in newer models) and feeling the road. The Lyriq is as insulated from road noise as any car I have ever heard and despite it not having an air ride suspension, you can barely feel the road when you hit anything. 2) The Touchscreen- I know, this is going to be extremely controversial and it comes down to preference. I really like the design of the LYRIQs screen and it having built in Android as well as Apple CarPlay. The performance of the UI is much better than my Model Y was, I am sure the newer Model Ys are quicker than mine, but I didn't need things like Netflix etc and preferred the layout of the Cadillac. 3) Luxury materials- The Lyriq feels like luxury, the Model Y is a minimalist premium car. The materials are no nicer than what you would find in a high trim Camry"
"Carbo Jan 25, 2026 I have been thinking of trading my Lyriq and getting a Vistiq. Has the Visiq been getting OTA updates like the other GM Vehicles? 1116Long replied Jan 26, 2026 Lyriq Forum - 2023+ davedogcaddy Jan 28, 2026 2023 Lyriq getting some OTA love (654.20)") Hadn't had any OTA updates since I had my final under warranty VWP done in early September 2025. This one came up today, I don't remember seeing it discussed anywhere. It's definitely the most 'exciting' sounding OTA I've seen on my 2023. Installed on the first try with no issues 421.5KZymurgy replied Feb 7, 2026"
"The camera on mine had a bit of a malfunction last Thursday (Exactly what @Lyriqitius described). We took in the next day and the dealer said there was an update for the camera, and it's worked as intended since then. - Arial - Book Antiqua - Courier New - Georgia - Tahoma - Times New Roman - Trebuchet MS - Verdana Post Reply Lyriq Forum hightech-guy Jan 22, 2023 2024 LYRIQ - new exterior colors Didn't see this mentioned in the 2024 order guide thread (and the web site doesn't make obvious this aspect), so thought I would add a dedicated thread. Regarding the new 2024 exterior colors, as with Debut and 2023, some colors are late availability and/or extra charge. Seems like Argent..."
"61.9KCadillac Customer Service replied Jul 17, 2024 Lyriq Forum JMass37135 Jul 25, 2024 2024 Lyriq data connection issue Purchased a new 2024 Lyriq on June 8 and the car has never been able to connect to the internet. Google maps and search obviously do not work and by extension Super Cruise is also not working, cannot get map updates. Car has been at the dealer all but two weeks since I bought it. GM has had them... 132.8KCadillac Customer Service replied Jun 13, 2025 Lyriq Forum MichelC Aug 7, 2024"
"Lyriq's Software is an Absolute Disaster the software on the Cadillac Lyriq is atrocious. GM should be embarrassed by how bad this is. Here’s my nightmare experience dealing with their broken CarPlay integration: * First time: CarPlay music would randomly cut off. Took it to the dealership for an update. Instead of fixing it, they somehow made it even worse, introducing a new problem. * Second time: Now, 50% of the time, the steering wheel previous/next track buttons stop working when using CarPlay. Another trip to the dealership, another software update. This time? Wireless CarPlay is completely dead. It just doesn’t connect at all anymore. My only option now is wired CarPlay, and guess what? Even that takes minutes to connect after starting the car, leaving me just sitting there waiting. * Third time: Heading back to the dealership yet again for another update. I have zero confidence that they will actually fix anything this time. GM’s software engineering is an absolute joke. It’s painfully obvious they never actually wanted to properly integrate CarPlay (remember when they were thinking about canceling it? What a joke). The reasons? 1. They pay their software engineers peanuts, so the quality is absolute trash. 2. They cut their software department, making it even worse. 3. They clearly don’t care about user experience when it comes to software. This is easily the worst software I’ve ever seen in a modern vehicle. How does a company this big screw up basic CarPlay functionality this badly? Unbelievable."
"The dealer has eight lyrics on the lot right now, and every single one of them, the dash and door alignment where the chrome stripped ones around misaligned that it would drive me nuts sitting in that car every day seeing that. Every single car was different and I had the same exact issue with the wraparound dash in my bolt. Also, the rear spoiler where it meets the roof arch is also misaligned on every car. So it is not flush. Some have it on the left side and some have it on the right side but when driving/standing behind the car it’s very obvious that something is off And I remember seeing images last year of GM executives pointing at that spot and stopping shipments so it appears the issue was not fixed with the 2024s?"
"#78· Mar 15, 2024 #21· Dec 26, 2023\\ \\ \\ (Edited) Additional pics from today. The car in the last two pics was sitting right there with the hood open, door handles sticking out, and interior disassembled, right where everyone could see it. Sticker still on the window."
Showing 8 of 82 owner excerpts (sorted by sentiment strength)