2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E CAL RT 1 ER RWD
Premium Electric SUV · RWD
Based on battery health, build quality, owner data, EPA range, and market pricing
Below average for 2022 EV SUVs (class avg 66)
Personalize this scoreIs a low score bad?
Last scanned 12 days ago
The 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E CAL RT 1 ER RWD packs 290 hp, 314 miles of EPA range and a 91 kWh battery, and with 8 recall campaigns on this make/year, the VIN lookup is the first thing you do.
Score read
A 56/100 makes this not a casual purchase. Do not let the composite hide this split: build quality score is 75/100, while owner feedback score is 35/100. Owners on Reddit repeatedly cite software tech and owner satisfaction as recurring problems. Documented completion matters more than the recall count itself.
Price context
Used examples are running around $27,640. This trim started from $52,775 new, though options can push the actual sticker higher; treat the market number as your negotiation floor and pull a current KBB Fair Purchase before naming a price.
Who this is for
✓ Good for
- ⏱ Daily commuter ≤50 mi/day, predictable charging
- ↦ Road tripper Long trips, needs DC fast network
✗ Avoid if you are a
- $ Bargain hunter Best TCO, reliability + low depreciation
Gotchas
- Serviceable Recall paperwork has to match the exact VIN.
Mitigation Use NHTSA and the automaker lookup, then require repair records instead of a verbal promise.
- Verify Owner feedback is the part to read carefully (35/100).
Mitigation Read the complaint themes and ask whether this VIN has already had those issues repaired.
Pre-purchase inspection
- 1 Run the exact VIN through NHTSA and the automaker recall lookup before discussing price.
- 2 Compare the dashboard range estimate with the EPA 314-mile rating after a full charge.
- 3 Confirm how much of the 8-year/100,000-mile battery warranty remains and whether it transfers.
- 4 If road trips matter, run a short DC fast-charge session and watch whether speed tapers normally.
- 5 Read the complaint themes, not just the count, and ask the seller whether those issues have shown up on this VIN.
VIN status first This model has 8 NHTSA recall records. The exact VIN lookup decides whether the car in front of you is clear.
Complaint context This scan found 121 NHTSA complaint records (6.9 per 10K VINs, near industry average). Read the themes below before treating the raw count as the verdict.
Price anchor Current market range is $21,700-$27,640. Use that range to compare listings for the same trim, mileage, and condition.
Pricing & Market Value
Score Breakdown
What matters most to you?
Drag the sliders to prioritize what you care about. Your TrimIndex Score recalculates instantly.
Vehicle Specifications
EVs at your price point that match or beat this trim
Price-gated peer set: vehicles within $19.7K–$29.6K market value (±20% of $24.7K). 6 outscore · 0 score within ±2. Mixed across makes — no "spend more, score better" comps.
EV6
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Stronger safety record
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
Ioniq 5
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
- ✓ Stronger safety record
Model Y
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
Niro
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
- ✓ Better safety score
Q4 e-tron
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Better bang-for-buck
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
Kona
- ✓ Happier owners overall
- ✓ Stronger safety record
- ✓ Better infotainment UX
The federal $4,000 used-EV credit ended Sept 30, 2025.
But 10 states still run their own used-EV rebate programs — some up to $5,000. Pick your state to see what's available for this trim.
Source & disclaimer
Dealers make ~$8,066 on the average car loan.
After the price is set, the finance manager runs four plays to rebuild margin. Every buyer without a pre-approval is a target. Here's exactly what they run — and what stops each one.
78% of dealer loans carry a hidden +1.13% markup above what the lender actually charges. You never see it — it's buried in the contract. · CFPB
Dealer must match or beat your lender — they can't add margin invisibly. The markup play is dead on arrival.
Once you answer, they stretch the term to hit your number. Median result: $4K less off the price, 12 more months on the loan. · Industry avg
Financing is done. Only the sale price is on the table — and the dealer knows it.
Back-office F&I profit averages $1,975/vehicle, up 8.5% YoY. These products exist — but dealer markup is 4–10x what you'd pay elsewhere. · Dealership Guy
Dealer GAP runs $500–1K. Your insurer sells the same coverage for $100–250 over 5 years. Now you know.
"Your loan fell through — come re-sign." This pulls your APR up +5% on average. It's legal. It works because you've already driven the car home. · Ctr for Responsible Lending
A lender commitment letter means the deal is final. "Pending dealer approval" doesn't apply. You can't be yo-yo'd.
That's 22 months of your car payment — handed to the dealer's finance department for nothing.
Takes 2 minutes. No obligation to use it — but you'll walk in with all the leverage.
Pre-approval is a soft credit inquiry — no score impact. FICO treats all auto-loan hard pulls within 14 days as one, so you can still shop rates at the dealer.
NHTSA Recalls (8)
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2022 Mustang Mach E vehicles equipped with an extended range battery. The high voltage battery main contactors may overheat.
An overheated high voltage battery contactor can result in a loss of drive power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2025 Mustang Mach E vehicles. In the event of a low battery charge, the electronic door latches may remain locked once the driver or front passenger exits and shuts the door, possibly trapping someone who is unable to use the inside door release handles, such as a child in the back seat.
The inability to enter or exit the vehicle in an emergency increases the risk of injury.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2024 Bronco, F-150, 2021-2024 Edge, 2022-2025 Escape, F-250, F-350, F-450, F-550, F-600, 2022-2024 Expedition, 2022-2025 Transit, 2021-2023 Mach-E, 2024 Ranger, Mustang, 2021-2023 Lincoln Nautilus, 2022-2024 Navigator, and 2023-2024 Corsair vehicles. A software error may cause the rearview camera image to delay, freeze, or not display when the vehicle is in reverse.
A frozen or missing rearview camera image can reduce the driver's view behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles previously repaired incorrectly under recall number 22V-412. The high voltage battery main contactors may overheat.
An overheated high voltage battery contactor may cause the vehicle to lose drive power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles equipped with an extended range battery. The high voltage battery main contactors may overheat.
An overheated high voltage battery contactor can result in a loss of drive power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles. The right-rear axle half shafts may have been manufactured improperly, allowing the half shaft stem to break under load.
A broken half shaft can cause a loss of drive power, or a rollaway could occur while parked if the electronic parking brake is not engaged. Either of these scenarios can increase the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles. The high voltage battery main contactors may overheat.
An overheated high voltage battery contactor may cause the vehicle to lose drive power, increasing the risk of a crash.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govFord Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2021-2022 Mustang Mach-E and 2022 Maverick vehicles. The rear seat belt buckles may not be properly attached to the rear floor assembly. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard numbers 208, "Occupant Crash Protection," and 210, "Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages."
Improperly attached seat belts may not adequately restrain an occupant in a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
Check VIN status at NHTSA.govNHTSA Complaints (121 total · 6.9 per 10K US vehicles · near industry average)
Parking brake malfunction indicated. Ford CSP 22P31 covers repair of the issue for vehichles with a manufacture date before 3/15/22. My vehicle reached the US on 6/22/22. Ford has offered to cover a small part of the repair, but won't include me in the fix due to manufacture date. So Ford ended the program, NEVER FIXED THE ISSUE, and now won't offer to repair my car.
Parking brake malfunction indicated. Ford CSP 22P31 covers repair of the issue for vehichles with a manufacture date before 3/15/22. My vehicle reached the US on 6/22/22. Ford has offered to cover a small part of the repair, but won't include me in the fix due to manufacture date. So Ford ended the program, NEVER FIXED THE ISSUE, and now won't offer to repair my car.
Vehicle: 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E Mileage at failure: ~36,800 miles Complaint Description: The left rear electronic parking brake (EPB) wiring harness/connector failed, resulting in a parking brake fault and abnormal braking behavior. This component is not a wear-and-tear item and is located in a fixed, protected area of the vehicle. It is not subject to routine maintenance or driver interaction. The failed wiring harness was inspected by an authorized Ford dealership and is available for further inspection upon request. This failure put safety at risk because the electronic parking brake is a safety-critical braking system. The fault created uncertainty regarding proper engagement and release of the parking brake, increasing the risk of unintended vehicle movement when parked and reduced confidence in braking reliability while driving. The problem was confirmed and diagnosed by a Ford dealership, which determined the wiring failure developed over time due to moisture intrusion and corrosion, not misuse, accident damage, or normal wear. The vehicle and component were inspected by an authorized Ford dealership. Ford Motor Company reviewed the repair documentation through Ford Customer Care but did not dispute the diagnosis. The component has not been inspected by police or insurance representatives. A parking brake fault warning message appeared shortly before diagnosis, accompanied by abnormal braking behavior. There were no prior accidents, vehicle modifications, or external damage related to the failure. This failure is identical to a known defect already acknowledged by Ford in Customer Satisfaction Program 22P31, which covers EPB wiring harness connector failures on other 2021–2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles. Although my VIN was excluded, the same non-wear safety defect occurred within the same model year, indicating a broader safety concern beyond the original VIN population.
Vehicle: 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E Mileage at failure: ~36,800 miles Complaint Description: The left rear electronic parking brake (EPB) wiring harness/connector failed, resulting in a parking brake fault and abnormal braking behavior. This component is not a wear-and-tear item and is located in a fixed, protected area of the vehicle. It is not subject to routine maintenance or driver interaction. The failed wiring harness was inspected by an authorized Ford dealership and is available for further inspection upon request. This failure put safety at risk because the electronic parking brake is a safety-critical braking system. The fault created uncertainty regarding proper engagement and release of the parking brake, increasing the risk of unintended vehicle movement when parked and reduced confidence in braking reliability while driving. The problem was confirmed and diagnosed by a Ford dealership, which determined the wiring failure developed over time due to moisture intrusion and corrosion, not misuse, accident damage, or normal wear. The vehicle and component were inspected by an authorized Ford dealership. Ford Motor Company reviewed the repair documentation through Ford Customer Care but did not dispute the diagnosis. The component has not been inspected by police or insurance representatives. A parking brake fault warning message appeared shortly before diagnosis, accompanied by abnormal braking behavior. There were no prior accidents, vehicle modifications, or external damage related to the failure. This failure is identical to a known defect already acknowledged by Ford in Customer Satisfaction Program 22P31, which covers EPB wiring harness connector failures on other 2021–2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles. Although my VIN was excluded, the same non-wear safety defect occurred within the same model year, indicating a broader safety concern beyond the original VIN population.
I was backing up the car and the car raced on it own at least couple of times. Luckily no-one was injured. I am worried about the safety of my family including a newborn. There was a Recall 22S29 for the mach-e but it seems to have not fixed the issue for my car.
I was backing up the car and the car raced on it own at least couple of times. Luckily no-one was injured. I am worried about the safety of my family including a newborn. There was a Recall 22S29 for the mach-e but it seems to have not fixed the issue for my car.
On November 15, 2024, my Ford Mustang Mach-E was involved in a rear-end collision on Interstate 270 near Clarksburg, Maryland. I was struck at high speed by a box truck, which pushed my vehicle forward into the van in front of me. The rear of the vehicle sustained significant damage, including the complete shattering of the rear window. During the impact, the steering wheel detached from the steering column and came off entirely in my hands. This occurred without the airbag deploying in the steering wheel area. The separation exposed the internal column components and wiring. This type of failure appears to be a serious safety defect. A steering wheel should not detach from the column in a rear-impact collision, and the separation could have resulted in loss of control or severe injury. I am submitting this report because I believe this warrants investigation for potential structural or component failure in the steering column assembly. I have photographs documenting the rear damage, the detached steering wheel, and the exposed steering column.
On November 15, 2024, my Ford Mustang Mach-E was involved in a rear-end collision on Interstate 270 near Clarksburg, Maryland. I was struck at high speed by a box truck, which pushed my vehicle forward into the van in front of me. The rear of the vehicle sustained significant damage, including the complete shattering of the rear window. During the impact, the steering wheel detached from the steering column and came off entirely in my hands. This occurred without the airbag deploying in the steering wheel area. The separation exposed the internal column components and wiring. This type of failure appears to be a serious safety defect. A steering wheel should not detach from the column in a rear-impact collision, and the separation could have resulted in loss of control or severe injury. I am submitting this report because I believe this warrants investigation for potential structural or component failure in the steering column assembly. I have photographs documenting the rear damage, the detached steering wheel, and the exposed steering column.
I was waiting in a drive thru behind a line of cars at a full stop for some time, so I was using One Pedal assist/Auto Hold. My car suddenly accelerated and slammed into the car in front of me.
I was waiting in a drive thru behind a line of cars at a full stop for some time, so I was using One Pedal assist/Auto Hold. My car suddenly accelerated and slammed into the car in front of me.
Shortly after purchasing my vehicle on [XXX], specifically on [XXX] a significant malfunction was encountered, indicated by the 'Front Camera Fault Service Required' and 'Pre-Collision Assist Not Available' warnings. Returning to the dealership on May 5th, the manager misinformed, stating the issue was a recall and required service at a Ford dealership. However, upon contacting Ford Lincoln with the VIN, it was discovered these codes are not associated with any recall. I returned to the dealership, provided them the printout from Ford Lincoln explaining the codes and how it's not a recall. They then told me that they will not honor the repairs due to me exceeding my 30-day extension. I proceeded to leave and said I'll deal with it when it poses a problem. After a resent software update, a new code popped up saying "Door Fault Service Required". July 2025 Koons Ford picked my car up and they confirmed that the issues documented in the attached photos are not covered by any recalls. However, this experience is further corroborated by attached photos and testimony from others reporting identical recurring problems since 2022. You can reference to the [XXX] " for the other vehicle owner's testimony. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Shortly after purchasing my vehicle on [XXX], specifically on [XXX] a significant malfunction was encountered, indicated by the 'Front Camera Fault Service Required' and 'Pre-Collision Assist Not Available' warnings. Returning to the dealership on May 5th, the manager misinformed, stating the issue was a recall and required service at a Ford dealership. However, upon contacting Ford Lincoln with the VIN, it was discovered these codes are not associated with any recall. I returned to the dealership, provided them the printout from Ford Lincoln explaining the codes and how it's not a recall. They then told me that they will not honor the repairs due to me exceeding my 30-day extension. I proceeded to leave and said I'll deal with it when it poses a problem. After a resent software update, a new code popped up saying "Door Fault Service Required". July 2025 Koons Ford picked my car up and they confirmed that the issues documented in the attached photos are not covered by any recalls. However, this experience is further corroborated by attached photos and testimony from others reporting identical recurring problems since 2022. You can reference to the [XXX] " for the other vehicle owner's testimony. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Vehicle Information: •Make: Ford •Model: Mach-E •Model Year: 2022 •Vehicle Type: Electric SUV •VIN: [XXX] •Mileage at time of incident: 31114 •Purchased in: California Incident Date: [XXX] Location: Laguna Niguel, CA Injury: Yes Crash: Yes Fire: No Airbags Deployed: No Police Report Filed: Yes Description of Complaint: On or around [XXX], I was driving my 2022 Ford Mach-E when the steering wheel suddenly locked and the braking system failed completely. I lost all control of the vehicle and was unable to slow or steer the car, leading to a crash. Despite the severity of the incident, the airbags did not deploy. At the time, I did not have obvious injuries, but shortly afterward, I began to experience severe pain and physical impairment, including an inability to stand or walk without difficulty. These symptoms have worsened and are now impacting my daily life. The vehicle is now completely inoperable and appears to have suffered a critical system malfunction, possibly involving its electric or software control systems. There were no warning lights or indicators before the failure. I believe this is a serious safety defect in the Ford Mach-E and could pose a danger to other drivers. I am requesting that the NHTSA investigate whether this is part of a broader pattern of defects affecting Ford’s EV line and take action to prevent further injuries or fatalities. Contact Information: •Name: [XXX] •Phone: [XXX] •Email: [XXX] •Preferred contact method: email INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Vehicle Information: •Make: Ford •Model: Mach-E •Model Year: 2022 •Vehicle Type: Electric SUV •VIN: [XXX] •Mileage at time of incident: 31114 •Purchased in: California Incident Date: [XXX] Location: Laguna Niguel, CA Injury: Yes Crash: Yes Fire: No Airbags Deployed: No Police Report Filed: Yes Description of Complaint: On or around [XXX], I was driving my 2022 Ford Mach-E when the steering wheel suddenly locked and the braking system failed completely. I lost all control of the vehicle and was unable to slow or steer the car, leading to a crash. Despite the severity of the incident, the airbags did not deploy. At the time, I did not have obvious injuries, but shortly afterward, I began to experience severe pain and physical impairment, including an inability to stand or walk without difficulty. These symptoms have worsened and are now impacting my daily life. The vehicle is now completely inoperable and appears to have suffered a critical system malfunction, possibly involving its electric or software control systems. There were no warning lights or indicators before the failure. I believe this is a serious safety defect in the Ford Mach-E and could pose a danger to other drivers. I am requesting that the NHTSA investigate whether this is part of a broader pattern of defects affecting Ford’s EV line and take action to prevent further injuries or fatalities. Contact Information: •Name: [XXX] •Phone: [XXX] •Email: [XXX] •Preferred contact method: email INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I was driving my car like normal when a handful of warning signs popped up on the front screen and the brakes went out. I could only stop by pushing on the pedal with all my force, and it eventually slowed the car to a stop, but took an incredibly long distance to do so. A handful of warning lights popped on the screen when this happened: -Power train malfunction/reduced power - antilock brake fault - pre collision assist not available - hill start assist warning
I was driving my car like normal when a handful of warning signs popped up on the front screen and the brakes went out. I could only stop by pushing on the pedal with all my force, and it eventually slowed the car to a stop, but took an incredibly long distance to do so. A handful of warning lights popped on the screen when this happened: -Power train malfunction/reduced power - antilock brake fault - pre collision assist not available - hill start assist warning
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated that while driving approximately 20 MPH and pressing the brake pedal to stop, the vehicle suddenly accelerated forward and crashed into the rear of a second vehicle. Before the crash, the pre-collision warning had activated, but the vehicle did not stop. The front end of the had sustained severe damage but no bags deployed. No injuries were reported. A police report was taken at the scene, and the vehicle was later towed to a nearby collision facility. The cause of the failures has not yet been determined. The manufacturer and local dealer have not yet been contacted. The failure mileage was 19,100.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated that while driving approximately 20 MPH and pressing the brake pedal to stop, the vehicle suddenly accelerated forward and crashed into the rear of a second vehicle. Before the crash, the pre-collision warning had activated, but the vehicle did not stop. The front end of the had sustained severe damage but no bags deployed. No injuries were reported. A police report was taken at the scene, and the vehicle was later towed to a nearby collision facility. The cause of the failures has not yet been determined. The manufacturer and local dealer have not yet been contacted. The failure mileage was 19,100.
After 22,207 mi, the right rear wheel unit started making a clunking similar to a flat tire. I looked online and found TSB 22-2023 which states that a common problem with the Mach E one pedal driving is brake pad material gets fused to the rotor. I took it in for repair and the brakes are out of warranty after 18000mi. Average life of brake rotors FOR CARS THAT USE THEIR BRAKES is 30,000-70,000mi. If Ford knowingly continues to use brake components that become faulty and fail after such.a short time on cars that don’t regularly use brakes, this problem could cause serious brake failure in cases of emergent braking. One pedal users would not know their brake pads had fused to the rotors until too late and the braking system fails when they need it.
After 22,207 mi, the right rear wheel unit started making a clunking similar to a flat tire. I looked online and found TSB 22-2023 which states that a common problem with the Mach E one pedal driving is brake pad material gets fused to the rotor. I took it in for repair and the brakes are out of warranty after 18000mi. Average life of brake rotors FOR CARS THAT USE THEIR BRAKES is 30,000-70,000mi. If Ford knowingly continues to use brake components that become faulty and fail after such.a short time on cars that don’t regularly use brakes, this problem could cause serious brake failure in cases of emergent braking. One pedal users would not know their brake pads had fused to the rotors until too late and the braking system fails when they need it.
At highway speeds, the power brakes failed. In order to slow the car down, the brakes pedal had to be modulated with extreme force, upwards of 100 pounds of pressure on the brake pedal. As this happened, the car raised 4 Active Alerts - Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power - Antilock Brake Fault - Hill Start Assist Warning - Pre-Collision Assist Not Available. It took a lot of force and distance to bring the car safely to a stop. After 20 minutes we restarted the car and it began to operate normally. The car was brought to a nearby dealer immediately, however, the dealership is unable to diagnose nor replicate the problem. ***We were extremely lucky there were no cars immediately in front of us, and that we have an extreme amount of room to stop. Had we been driving in traffic, there would have been an extremely high likelihood of an accident with injury.
At highway speeds, the power brakes failed. In order to slow the car down, the brakes pedal had to be modulated with extreme force, upwards of 100 pounds of pressure on the brake pedal. As this happened, the car raised 4 Active Alerts - Powertrain Malfunction / Reduced Power - Antilock Brake Fault - Hill Start Assist Warning - Pre-Collision Assist Not Available. It took a lot of force and distance to bring the car safely to a stop. After 20 minutes we restarted the car and it began to operate normally. The car was brought to a nearby dealer immediately, however, the dealership is unable to diagnose nor replicate the problem. ***We were extremely lucky there were no cars immediately in front of us, and that we have an extreme amount of room to stop. Had we been driving in traffic, there would have been an extremely high likelihood of an accident with injury.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated while reversing at slow speeds in a parking area, the vehicle suddenly independently accelerated. The contact briefly lost control of the vehicle and came to a complete stop after striking the curb. No warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was towed to the dealer, who was unable to diagnose the vehicle or duplicate the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, a case was opened, and the contact was referred to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was 17,000.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated while reversing at slow speeds in a parking area, the vehicle suddenly independently accelerated. The contact briefly lost control of the vehicle and came to a complete stop after striking the curb. No warning lights were illuminated. The vehicle was towed to the dealer, who was unable to diagnose the vehicle or duplicate the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure, a case was opened, and the contact was referred to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was 17,000.
On 1/6/24 it just started lightly snowing and I drove the car home and parked in my diveway which has a slight incline. There was less than 1” of new light snow on my driveway. The car does not fit in the garage so I need to park it outside in order to reach the charger which is in the garage. I parked the car with the car in park and the emergency brake on and the car was off. I turned to go inside to open the garage so I could plug it in. My car started flashing and beeping and proceeded to roll down my driveway and into the road. a notification came up on my app stating that it was an “inclination alarm”. I couldn’t believe it so I then parked the car behind my other car in the driveway further down the driveway and the same thing happened. I then called my friend and he stayed with me on the phone while I stayed in the car to see if it would do it again and it did. The car litereally rolled down my driveway 3 times and I caught it on my security camera 2 times as the 3rd time the camera timed out. Yes, the car rolling into the road could literally kill someone and there are many children and pedestrians who walk in my neighborhood.. I took it to the local dealer on Monday when they opened and showed the video to the service manager and he was dumbstruck. The car ended up being there for almost 2 months while I filed a case with Ford. They had a regional technician check it out and they could not recreate the issue. They said that there is nothing mechanically wrong with the vehicle. They made me pick up the car or they would start charging me storage. They essentially said that it was just a condition of the car because it was heavy. No other car I own has ever done that. I travel locally for my business to people’s homes which is the reason I purchased this car. I cannot drive it during the winter months because it will roll away. Ford will not accept liabilty for it nor will they buy it back. I can’t attach the videos but I can email them.
On 1/6/24 it just started lightly snowing and I drove the car home and parked in my diveway which has a slight incline. There was less than 1” of new light snow on my driveway. The car does not fit in the garage so I need to park it outside in order to reach the charger which is in the garage. I parked the car with the car in park and the emergency brake on and the car was off. I turned to go inside to open the garage so I could plug it in. My car started flashing and beeping and proceeded to roll down my driveway and into the road. a notification came up on my app stating that it was an “inclination alarm”. I couldn’t believe it so I then parked the car behind my other car in the driveway further down the driveway and the same thing happened. I then called my friend and he stayed with me on the phone while I stayed in the car to see if it would do it again and it did. The car litereally rolled down my driveway 3 times and I caught it on my security camera 2 times as the 3rd time the camera timed out. Yes, the car rolling into the road could literally kill someone and there are many children and pedestrians who walk in my neighborhood.. I took it to the local dealer on Monday when they opened and showed the video to the service manager and he was dumbstruck. The car ended up being there for almost 2 months while I filed a case with Ford. They had a regional technician check it out and they could not recreate the issue. They said that there is nothing mechanically wrong with the vehicle. They made me pick up the car or they would start charging me storage. They essentially said that it was just a condition of the car because it was heavy. No other car I own has ever done that. I travel locally for my business to people’s homes which is the reason I purchased this car. I cannot drive it during the winter months because it will roll away. Ford will not accept liabilty for it nor will they buy it back. I can’t attach the videos but I can email them.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while having the Blue Cruise system activated at approximately 70 MPH, the vehicle suddenly drifted to the right. The contact was able to straighten out the vehicle however, the vehicle drifted to the left and then to the right again. After a while, the contact was able to regain control of the vehicle by manually operating the steering wheel instead of using the Blue Cruise system to control the vehicle. The contact stated that shortly after regaining control of the vehicle, the failure recurred in the opposite direction going from left to right, and then to the left. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact was able to maintain control. The dealer was contacted and was able to remotely pull the codes from the vehicle for diagnostic testing. The dealer diagnosed that the camera system and control modules had failed. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The manufacturer referred the contact to the dealer for servicing. The failure mileage was 30,000.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while having the Blue Cruise system activated at approximately 70 MPH, the vehicle suddenly drifted to the right. The contact was able to straighten out the vehicle however, the vehicle drifted to the left and then to the right again. After a while, the contact was able to regain control of the vehicle by manually operating the steering wheel instead of using the Blue Cruise system to control the vehicle. The contact stated that shortly after regaining control of the vehicle, the failure recurred in the opposite direction going from left to right, and then to the left. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact was able to maintain control. The dealer was contacted and was able to remotely pull the codes from the vehicle for diagnostic testing. The dealer diagnosed that the camera system and control modules had failed. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The manufacturer referred the contact to the dealer for servicing. The failure mileage was 30,000.
Post HVBJB recall, one-pedal drive randomly disengages. Operators of electric cars vehicles use one pedal driving to slow down the vehicle and brake. When that system of braking randomly fails, it is incredibly unsafe. Ford is aware of this problem and it's connection to the earlier recall. I can provide additional documentation if necessary. Ford recognizes issue but has not fix.
Post HVBJB recall, one-pedal drive randomly disengages. Operators of electric cars vehicles use one pedal driving to slow down the vehicle and brake. When that system of braking randomly fails, it is incredibly unsafe. Ford is aware of this problem and it's connection to the earlier recall. I can provide additional documentation if necessary. Ford recognizes issue but has not fix.
The vehicle was delivered [XXX], its an EV and does probably 70% highway/30% city driving. As an EV is on "one pedal" mode exclusively to use the motor to brake the vehicle and regenerate charge to the battery so we rarely use the actual brakes. at 18k mile we notices when the brakes were applied the vehicle and steering wheel shock, we took the car in for service and the front brake rotors were re-surfaced as per Metro Ford in Miami, FL. We noticed again at 22k miles and then Metro Ford in Miami, FL replaced the front rotors as they could not be resurfaced since they were already resurfaces once and would have been out of spec. At 28k miles we notices again, we took it again to Metro Ford in Miami, FL and they said it was cause by brake pad glazing and pad needed to re-surfaced and this time also resourced the rear rotors. All this is been done under warrantee with the exception of replacement of front pads in the last repair as Metro Ford in Miami, FL considered them a "wear" item (even with clear history with brakes) the approximate cost was $427. I believe there is clearly a brake defect with my car as i dont see how an EV on one pedal driving has needed to have front rotors resurfaced 2x and replaced 1x, needed new front pads, and need rear pads resurfaced 1x in less then 2 years/28K miles. Summary of brake repairs - 18k Miles - front rotors re-surfaced - 22k miles - front rotors replaced - 28k miles - front and rear rotors re-surfaced / front pads replaced INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The vehicle was delivered [XXX], its an EV and does probably 70% highway/30% city driving. As an EV is on "one pedal" mode exclusively to use the motor to brake the vehicle and regenerate charge to the battery so we rarely use the actual brakes. at 18k mile we notices when the brakes were applied the vehicle and steering wheel shock, we took the car in for service and the front brake rotors were re-surfaced as per Metro Ford in Miami, FL. We noticed again at 22k miles and then Metro Ford in Miami, FL replaced the front rotors as they could not be resurfaced since they were already resurfaces once and would have been out of spec. At 28k miles we notices again, we took it again to Metro Ford in Miami, FL and they said it was cause by brake pad glazing and pad needed to re-surfaced and this time also resourced the rear rotors. All this is been done under warrantee with the exception of replacement of front pads in the last repair as Metro Ford in Miami, FL considered them a "wear" item (even with clear history with brakes) the approximate cost was $427. I believe there is clearly a brake defect with my car as i dont see how an EV on one pedal driving has needed to have front rotors resurfaced 2x and replaced 1x, needed new front pads, and need rear pads resurfaced 1x in less then 2 years/28K miles. Summary of brake repairs - 18k Miles - front rotors re-surfaced - 22k miles - front rotors replaced - 28k miles - front and rear rotors re-surfaced / front pads replaced INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I just had a similar experience about four hours ago during normal conditions (dry and daylight). I was approaching a red light that controlled an on/off ramp intersection where a rural road intersects a state Highway. I was on the rural road. As I started braking, the pedal almost immediately felt soft. I kept pressing (never pumped) the brake pedal steadily lexpecting to feel more normal resistance. The brake pedal traveled more than double the distance that it normally does. I started to get some braking, but I don’t think I could have locked up the brakes if I wanted to. The emergency braking didn’t engage; however, there wasn’t a car traveling in my lane between me and the intersection. There were cars exiting the freeway and turning through the intersection immediately in front of me. Fortunately, I had enough brakes to stop just before the intersection. I had my wife and son in the car. I will be having the local Ford dealership look over the car. That incident happened 5-10 minutes after leaving my house. I had used my brakes during this trip prior to the incident. The brakes worked normally for the remainder of the 20 minute trip. Whatever is going on, isn’t right and although I never was dangerously close to an accident, if conditions were slightly different it could have been very bad.
I just had a similar experience about four hours ago during normal conditions (dry and daylight). I was approaching a red light that controlled an on/off ramp intersection where a rural road intersects a state Highway. I was on the rural road. As I started braking, the pedal almost immediately felt soft. I kept pressing (never pumped) the brake pedal steadily lexpecting to feel more normal resistance. The brake pedal traveled more than double the distance that it normally does. I started to get some braking, but I don’t think I could have locked up the brakes if I wanted to. The emergency braking didn’t engage; however, there wasn’t a car traveling in my lane between me and the intersection. There were cars exiting the freeway and turning through the intersection immediately in front of me. Fortunately, I had enough brakes to stop just before the intersection. I had my wife and son in the car. I will be having the local Ford dealership look over the car. That incident happened 5-10 minutes after leaving my house. I had used my brakes during this trip prior to the incident. The brakes worked normally for the remainder of the 20 minute trip. Whatever is going on, isn’t right and although I never was dangerously close to an accident, if conditions were slightly different it could have been very bad.
I have had 14 incidents over two years where this vehicle suddenly, rapidly accelerates from slow speed, usually less than 15 mph, and six of those incidents had a near collision. Most of the incidents happen in a parking lot or drive-thru and require immediate fast braking to avoid collision. This sudden, unexpected acceleration has been widely discussed on the Mach-E Forum and there is general agreement the cause is inadvertent engaging cruise control by accidentally hitting an overly sensitive button on the steering wheel when the hands are in the 9 to 3 position. I have reviewed all related threads on the forum and counted 36 different owners who have experienced this same problem, most reporting near collisions and serious concerns for safety. Some posters have described possible remedies.
I have had 14 incidents over two years where this vehicle suddenly, rapidly accelerates from slow speed, usually less than 15 mph, and six of those incidents had a near collision. Most of the incidents happen in a parking lot or drive-thru and require immediate fast braking to avoid collision. This sudden, unexpected acceleration has been widely discussed on the Mach-E Forum and there is general agreement the cause is inadvertent engaging cruise control by accidentally hitting an overly sensitive button on the steering wheel when the hands are in the 9 to 3 position. I have reviewed all related threads on the forum and counted 36 different owners who have experienced this same problem, most reporting near collisions and serious concerns for safety. Some posters have described possible remedies.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 60 MPH the steering and braking systems suddenly malfunctioned causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The driver was unable to steer the vehicle and when pressing the brake pedal the vehicle did not stop. The driver lost control of the vehicle drove off the road and down a ravine and crashed into a concrete embankment. During the crash neither front air bags deployed. The front passenger sustained a fractured sternum and was transported from the scene to the hospital. The driver of the vehicle sustained a concussion which later required medical attention. A police report was taken at the scene and the vehicle was towed away. The cause of the failures was not yet determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failure. The contact indicated that the vehicle was recently serviced for NHTSA Campaign number: 23V687000(Electrical System). The failure mileage was 9,100.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 60 MPH the steering and braking systems suddenly malfunctioned causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The driver was unable to steer the vehicle and when pressing the brake pedal the vehicle did not stop. The driver lost control of the vehicle drove off the road and down a ravine and crashed into a concrete embankment. During the crash neither front air bags deployed. The front passenger sustained a fractured sternum and was transported from the scene to the hospital. The driver of the vehicle sustained a concussion which later required medical attention. A police report was taken at the scene and the vehicle was towed away. The cause of the failures was not yet determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failure. The contact indicated that the vehicle was recently serviced for NHTSA Campaign number: 23V687000(Electrical System). The failure mileage was 9,100.
Ford did an update recently, 6.8.0, which obscures the speedometer and moved it to far right of the IPC making it difficult to see now when driving. This is safety issue and I like to have the speed of my vehicle right in front me where it should be.
Ford did an update recently, 6.8.0, which obscures the speedometer and moved it to far right of the IPC making it difficult to see now when driving. This is safety issue and I like to have the speed of my vehicle right in front me where it should be.
Brakes automatically engage when parked. Next time I went to drive the car wouldn't move until a loud "clunk" came from the rear and the car moved. But, when I started driving there was a repetitive noise coming with each turn of a rear wheel. Parked the car and took to dealership which confirmed that a "chunk" of the brake pad had come off and adhered to the brake rotor. Contacted Ford and was told that it wasn't covered under warranty because I had gone more than 12, 000 miles. They did set up a case (CAS-46526025-Q7S5V2), but I never heard anything from it. In conversation with the dealer, this is apparently a common problem for which Ford has issued at least 2 TSBs (21-2206 & 22-2023) but the term expired before my incident. From reading of other incidents on various forums for the MachE, it is apparent that the problem still persists as in my case and is affecting a number of owners. Ford needs to be pressured into issuing a recall to install improved brake pads/rotors to prevent this problem from occurring. It could happen at a time when it isn't easy to pull over and therefore, cause an accident.
Brakes automatically engage when parked. Next time I went to drive the car wouldn't move until a loud "clunk" came from the rear and the car moved. But, when I started driving there was a repetitive noise coming with each turn of a rear wheel. Parked the car and took to dealership which confirmed that a "chunk" of the brake pad had come off and adhered to the brake rotor. Contacted Ford and was told that it wasn't covered under warranty because I had gone more than 12, 000 miles. They did set up a case (CAS-46526025-Q7S5V2), but I never heard anything from it. In conversation with the dealer, this is apparently a common problem for which Ford has issued at least 2 TSBs (21-2206 & 22-2023) but the term expired before my incident. From reading of other incidents on various forums for the MachE, it is apparent that the problem still persists as in my case and is affecting a number of owners. Ford needs to be pressured into issuing a recall to install improved brake pads/rotors to prevent this problem from occurring. It could happen at a time when it isn't easy to pull over and therefore, cause an accident.
There is a common software bug on Mustang Mach-E vehicles where the "drive mode" of the vehicle (a software feature that changes the braking, suspension, and acceleration characteristics of the vehicle) will suddenly change and a popup will appear on the screen stating "Drive Mode Unavailable" While decelerating to stop at a light, the "drive mode unavailable" warning appeared, the braking characteristics of the vehicle changed, and I ran out into the middle of the intersection.
There is a common software bug on Mustang Mach-E vehicles where the "drive mode" of the vehicle (a software feature that changes the braking, suspension, and acceleration characteristics of the vehicle) will suddenly change and a popup will appear on the screen stating "Drive Mode Unavailable" While decelerating to stop at a light, the "drive mode unavailable" warning appeared, the braking characteristics of the vehicle changed, and I ran out into the middle of the intersection.
I parked my MachE at home on Sunday evening and I had "lock the car when i walk away" setting turned ON. I also had alarm system turned ON. Car keys were more than 20-25ft away in my home. So, technically no one should be able to break into my car without sounding an alarm. Yet, theft happened on Monday morning without any physical damage to the car and no alarm was sounded. Ford said take the car to dealer and dealer said they don't know how to get the car logs to determine what\how happened and they want to charge me a fee just to take a look at it. Car also had my garage door key programmed, so thief could have simply opened the garage and could come it right away while kids and we were sleeping - it's big security risk. It very much sounds like some fault in the car as one of the scenarios - 1) it didn't lock on Sunday evening even though I had walk away lock setting turned on, or 2) it's so easy to fake or replicate the signals from the key which was stored at home or 3) alarm system is at fault and it didn't trigger for some reason.
I parked my MachE at home on Sunday evening and I had "lock the car when i walk away" setting turned ON. I also had alarm system turned ON. Car keys were more than 20-25ft away in my home. So, technically no one should be able to break into my car without sounding an alarm. Yet, theft happened on Monday morning without any physical damage to the car and no alarm was sounded. Ford said take the car to dealer and dealer said they don't know how to get the car logs to determine what\how happened and they want to charge me a fee just to take a look at it. Car also had my garage door key programmed, so thief could have simply opened the garage and could come it right away while kids and we were sleeping - it's big security risk. It very much sounds like some fault in the car as one of the scenarios - 1) it didn't lock on Sunday evening even though I had walk away lock setting turned on, or 2) it's so easy to fake or replicate the signals from the key which was stored at home or 3) alarm system is at fault and it didn't trigger for some reason.
The panoramic glass roof is slowly failing. The glass began to develop a small stress crack (with no sign or notice of impact as cause) which, over the months, has grown to a complete circle, about 12 inches in lengths. Additional stress cracks will easily compromise the glass and cause an immediate road safety hazard. Ford dealership denies any responsibility or warranty claim, falsely claiming it was due to some kind of impact when it was not.
The panoramic glass roof is slowly failing. The glass began to develop a small stress crack (with no sign or notice of impact as cause) which, over the months, has grown to a complete circle, about 12 inches in lengths. Additional stress cracks will easily compromise the glass and cause an immediate road safety hazard. Ford dealership denies any responsibility or warranty claim, falsely claiming it was due to some kind of impact when it was not.
While driving on the freeway at about 65 mph through a gradual left bend in the road, with fully active SuperCruise (lane keeping, active cruise control) and fully hands off, the vehicle suddenly veered into the adjacent right lane. The vehicle moved into the adjacent lane at a high rate, and could have resulted in a heavy side impact to a vehicle driving in that lane (and potentially rippling into the lane to the right of that as well). Throughout the deviation, SuperCruise remained active without warning lamps or any inducement of driver takeover. I caught the malfunction and manually overpowered the steering to bring the vehicle back into the original driving lane. The vehicle has no recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks campaigns needing VIN-specific checks, and is operating with the latest firmware updates installed. The vehicle has not been inspected by dealer, manufacturer, or any other group for any relating issues.
While driving on the freeway at about 65 mph through a gradual left bend in the road, with fully active SuperCruise (lane keeping, active cruise control) and fully hands off, the vehicle suddenly veered into the adjacent right lane. The vehicle moved into the adjacent lane at a high rate, and could have resulted in a heavy side impact to a vehicle driving in that lane (and potentially rippling into the lane to the right of that as well). Throughout the deviation, SuperCruise remained active without warning lamps or any inducement of driver takeover. I caught the malfunction and manually overpowered the steering to bring the vehicle back into the original driving lane. The vehicle has no recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks campaigns needing VIN-specific checks, and is operating with the latest firmware updates installed. The vehicle has not been inspected by dealer, manufacturer, or any other group for any relating issues.
On 3 occasions in the past month I have been driving down the road and, without any action from me, cruise control has turned itself on, with a speed set above the speed limit. I noticed it because the car accelerated to reach the target speed (which was an unsafe speed). I immediately braked and turned off the cruise control. The first two times it happened, I was pretty sure I had not accidentally activated cruise control by touching the button on the steering wheel. The third time, I was on a straight stretch of highway and was 100% sure I had done nothing to activate cruise control I had not used cruise control at any point from the time I turned on the car until the time this happened. I was between 10 and 15 minutes into my trip when this occurred.
On 3 occasions in the past month I have been driving down the road and, without any action from me, cruise control has turned itself on, with a speed set above the speed limit. I noticed it because the car accelerated to reach the target speed (which was an unsafe speed). I immediately braked and turned off the cruise control. The first two times it happened, I was pretty sure I had not accidentally activated cruise control by touching the button on the steering wheel. The third time, I was on a straight stretch of highway and was 100% sure I had done nothing to activate cruise control I had not used cruise control at any point from the time I turned on the car until the time this happened. I was between 10 and 15 minutes into my trip when this occurred.
On at least 8 occasions the car unintentionally shifted into cruise control and accelerated immediately. This usually happened while driving under 30 mph and rapidly accelerated to a much higher speed, sometimes set as high as 70 mph. On 3 occasions this happened in a parking lot and 2 occasions in a bank drive thru with a vehicle only a few feet in front of me. Immediate emergency braking was required to avoid an accident with two very close calls within 1-3 feet of vehicle in front of me. This experience has been reported by numerous persons on the Mach E Forum (similarly complaining of near accidents) and the general conclusion is that the button that activates cruise control is both unnecessarily super sensitive and poorly located so that it is engaged by the lightest touch of your left palm, base of your left thumb, or another finger as you move it across the steering wheel. Please note that the form below does not allow for numerous occurrences.
On at least 8 occasions the car unintentionally shifted into cruise control and accelerated immediately. This usually happened while driving under 30 mph and rapidly accelerated to a much higher speed, sometimes set as high as 70 mph. On 3 occasions this happened in a parking lot and 2 occasions in a bank drive thru with a vehicle only a few feet in front of me. Immediate emergency braking was required to avoid an accident with two very close calls within 1-3 feet of vehicle in front of me. This experience has been reported by numerous persons on the Mach E Forum (similarly complaining of near accidents) and the general conclusion is that the button that activates cruise control is both unnecessarily super sensitive and poorly located so that it is engaged by the lightest touch of your left palm, base of your left thumb, or another finger as you move it across the steering wheel. Please note that the form below does not allow for numerous occurrences.
The cruise control is activated by the slightest touch of the button. Running the heel of your hand over the button will activate it. The button acts like a screen touch rather than a button.
The cruise control is activated by the slightest touch of the button. Running the heel of your hand over the button will activate it. The button acts like a screen touch rather than a button.
Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.
Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang. The contact stated while pulling into a parking spot at approximately 2 MPH and had not yet placed the vehicle in park, the vehicle had an unintended acceleration. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle crashed into a light post, ran over the post, and crashed into a back of a building. The vehicle had damage to the hood, grill and bumper and also to the undercarriage. The contact said he had not suffered any injuries. The police were on the scene and filed a report. The contact had the vehicle towed to a collision repair shop. The vehicle had not been diagnosed by a dealer or independent mechanic. The vehicle had not been repaired. The contact researched online and related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V333000 (Vehicle Speed Control, Power Train). The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,500.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang. The contact stated while pulling into a parking spot at approximately 2 MPH and had not yet placed the vehicle in park, the vehicle had an unintended acceleration. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle crashed into a light post, ran over the post, and crashed into a back of a building. The vehicle had damage to the hood, grill and bumper and also to the undercarriage. The contact said he had not suffered any injuries. The police were on the scene and filed a report. The contact had the vehicle towed to a collision repair shop. The vehicle had not been diagnosed by a dealer or independent mechanic. The vehicle had not been repaired. The contact researched online and related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V333000 (Vehicle Speed Control, Power Train). The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,500.
Vehicle had an unintended acceleration resulting in crash in a parking lot.
Vehicle had an unintended acceleration resulting in crash in a parking lot.
Adaptive cruise control fault, pre-commission sensors not working, anti-lock break fault, restraint fault, tire pressure fault, dash turns off while driving which makes unable to see speed driving.
Adaptive cruise control fault, pre-commission sensors not working, anti-lock break fault, restraint fault, tire pressure fault, dash turns off while driving which makes unable to see speed driving.
Recall for this Mustang MachE. Unable to update software. This is a safety item and the intended fix is implemented by the vehicle owner. Took vehicle today to the Lake Geneva Wisconsin Ford dealership on 08.03.2022. Appointment made in advance. Ford service representative stated that it would take at least a half day. Appears no one has been trained on implementation on corrective actions. Other issue with navigation.
Recall for this Mustang MachE. Unable to update software. This is a safety item and the intended fix is implemented by the vehicle owner. Took vehicle today to the Lake Geneva Wisconsin Ford dealership on 08.03.2022. Appointment made in advance. Ford service representative stated that it would take at least a half day. Appears no one has been trained on implementation on corrective actions. Other issue with navigation.
This incident occurred on July 15th 2022. The dealership, Koons Falls Church Ford, located in Falls Church VA, sold us a car with an recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks on it. About 3 days after the car leaving the lot, the service department contacted us about a recall notice that needed to be resolve via software update. This issue could lead to the entire car losing power while in motion, recall number 22V412000. This information WAS NOT disclosed to us at any time during the sales process, and we did not find out until later that evening when looking for accessories online. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).
This incident occurred on July 15th 2022. The dealership, Koons Falls Church Ford, located in Falls Church VA, sold us a car with an recall campaigns needing VIN-specific checks on it. About 3 days after the car leaving the lot, the service department contacted us about a recall notice that needed to be resolve via software update. This issue could lead to the entire car losing power while in motion, recall number 22V412000. This information WAS NOT disclosed to us at any time during the sales process, and we did not find out until later that evening when looking for accessories online. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).
When starting car the instrument cluster was entirely blank. Center infotainment was functional. Due to use of digital dash in the car there were no warning lights or any information including speed available. It is unknown if any safety/driver assist systems were on or off because the display was non-functional. Issue resolved after performing 1 or more software resets documented across the internet but not documented in the manual. Steps to reset appear to be: 1) Perform a hard reset of the car (hold brake 15 sec, release brake 15 sec, press start without bake). 2) Allow car to fully reset and then turn off. 3) Move far enough away from car to trigger locks and put car into low power mode. 4) Return to car and power on. Hard reset did not provide immediate fix. Sync soft reset did not work.
When starting car the instrument cluster was entirely blank. Center infotainment was functional. Due to use of digital dash in the car there were no warning lights or any information including speed available. It is unknown if any safety/driver assist systems were on or off because the display was non-functional. Issue resolved after performing 1 or more software resets documented across the internet but not documented in the manual. Steps to reset appear to be: 1) Perform a hard reset of the car (hold brake 15 sec, release brake 15 sec, press start without bake). 2) Allow car to fully reset and then turn off. 3) Move far enough away from car to trigger locks and put car into low power mode. 4) Return to car and power on. Hard reset did not provide immediate fix. Sync soft reset did not work.
On December 17, 2022, I purchased a new 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E, VIN [XXX] -Lewis of Hoover Inc. for $48,665.00. Seven months later, the vehicle suffered a complete loss of drive power at highway speed — a near-serious injury (if not fatal) incident on a vehicle Ford had already identified as defective and subject to recall. In approximately July-August 2023 — seven months after purchase with only approximately 13 miles at purchase — the vehicle lost all drive power while I was driving on the freeway [XXX] ) at [XXX] le stalled completely. I was fortunate no vehicles struck me. The vehicle eventually restarted. I drove directly home and did not continue with my planned out of town trip. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
On December 17, 2022, I purchased a new 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E, VIN [XXX] -Lewis of Hoover Inc. for $48,665.00. Seven months later, the vehicle suffered a complete loss of drive power at highway speed — a near-serious injury (if not fatal) incident on a vehicle Ford had already identified as defective and subject to recall. In approximately July-August 2023 — seven months after purchase with only approximately 13 miles at purchase — the vehicle lost all drive power while I was driving on the freeway [XXX] ) at [XXX] le stalled completely. I was fortunate no vehicles struck me. The vehicle eventually restarted. I drove directly home and did not continue with my planned out of town trip. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Vehicle shutdown while driving causing total power loss and hitting a parked vehicle. No alerts or notifications were present at the time.
Vehicle shutdown while driving causing total power loss and hitting a parked vehicle. No alerts or notifications were present at the time.
File against: Ford Motor Company Vehicle: 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E VIN: [XXX] Safety Complaint While driving, the vehicle unexpectedly slowed down, lost power, and became inoperable, creating a serious safety hazard. I was able to pull over safely, but the sudden loss of motive power occurred during active roadway conditions. Dealer diagnosis identified a wiring harness connector failure affecting communication between vehicle control modules. After the repair, the same issue reoccurred within one to two days, again causing loss of power. The vehicle is currently back at the dealership, and the underlying defect has not yet been permanently resolved. This recurring electrical failure represents a loss-of-motive-power safety risk that may indicate a broader wiring harness defect affecting vehicle reliability and safety. Thanks and Regards INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
File against: Ford Motor Company Vehicle: 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E VIN: [XXX] Safety Complaint While driving, the vehicle unexpectedly slowed down, lost power, and became inoperable, creating a serious safety hazard. I was able to pull over safely, but the sudden loss of motive power occurred during active roadway conditions. Dealer diagnosis identified a wiring harness connector failure affecting communication between vehicle control modules. After the repair, the same issue reoccurred within one to two days, again causing loss of power. The vehicle is currently back at the dealership, and the underlying defect has not yet been permanently resolved. This recurring electrical failure represents a loss-of-motive-power safety risk that may indicate a broader wiring harness defect affecting vehicle reliability and safety. Thanks and Regards INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Car gave an error in the middle of the trip and displayed 'Stop Safely Now'. Will not start and run after this warning. The extended battery was fully charged before the trip and after 100 miles of driving it showed this message with 54% battery left.
Car gave an error in the middle of the trip and displayed 'Stop Safely Now'. Will not start and run after this warning. The extended battery was fully charged before the trip and after 100 miles of driving it showed this message with 54% battery left.
On Tuesday, [XXX], between approximately [XXX] and [XXX] PM EST, I parked my Mustang Mach-E, powered the vehicle off, and exited the car with my wife and child. After unloading groceries and sports equipment, I retrieved the Level 2 charger from the front of my garage and plugged it into the vehicle. I waited for the blue indicator lights to turn solid and blink, confirming charging had started, which typically takes about one minute. I believe the vehicle had been parked and powered off for approximately 10 minutes when I entered the house. Shortly thereafter, I heard an unusual clicking noise and observed the charging cable strike the side of the garage door opening. The vehicle had rolled backward approximately six feet, twisting and pulling the Level 2 charging unit off the joist it was mounted to and damaging the vehicle’s front charging port as the cable stopped the vehicle from rolling into the street. This incident occurred less than one week after the vehicle was returned from service for a “Parking Brake Fault – Service Now” error that was repaired at Losco Ford in Fenton, Michigan. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
On Tuesday, [XXX], between approximately [XXX] and [XXX] PM EST, I parked my Mustang Mach-E, powered the vehicle off, and exited the car with my wife and child. After unloading groceries and sports equipment, I retrieved the Level 2 charger from the front of my garage and plugged it into the vehicle. I waited for the blue indicator lights to turn solid and blink, confirming charging had started, which typically takes about one minute. I believe the vehicle had been parked and powered off for approximately 10 minutes when I entered the house. Shortly thereafter, I heard an unusual clicking noise and observed the charging cable strike the side of the garage door opening. The vehicle had rolled backward approximately six feet, twisting and pulling the Level 2 charging unit off the joist it was mounted to and damaging the vehicle’s front charging port as the cable stopped the vehicle from rolling into the street. This incident occurred less than one week after the vehicle was returned from service for a “Parking Brake Fault – Service Now” error that was repaired at Losco Ford in Fenton, Michigan. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
Passenger front door stopped opening from the outside. there is no power going to the door at all. There are alert codes appearing on the dashboard "passenger door ajar" "door fault. service required" I have taken it to Ford multiple times over the last 1 year, starting Dec 2024, for a fix and they are unable to find a solution. they attempted replacing physical parts with no success. There were no warning signs before this happened. One day i went to close my front passenger door and it would not open back up. This presented as a safety risk to me when I was being followed by a stranger, with my infant with me. I got in the car and pressed the lock button, but the stranger was still able to open my door. luckily I was able to drive away fast enough. however. because the door was seen as ajar, the car will not lock. this is a major safety issue when I cannot secure my vehicle to keep me and my child safe!
Passenger front door stopped opening from the outside. there is no power going to the door at all. There are alert codes appearing on the dashboard "passenger door ajar" "door fault. service required" I have taken it to Ford multiple times over the last 1 year, starting Dec 2024, for a fix and they are unable to find a solution. they attempted replacing physical parts with no success. There were no warning signs before this happened. One day i went to close my front passenger door and it would not open back up. This presented as a safety risk to me when I was being followed by a stranger, with my infant with me. I got in the car and pressed the lock button, but the stranger was still able to open my door. luckily I was able to drive away fast enough. however. because the door was seen as ajar, the car will not lock. this is a major safety issue when I cannot secure my vehicle to keep me and my child safe!
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, several unknown warning lights illuminated. The messages "Stop Safely Now", "Service Advancetrac", "Overdrive Off", and "Pre-Collision Indicator Off" were displayed. The contact pulled over and parked the vehicle. The vehicle failed to restart, and the 12-volt battery was drained. The vehicle was towed to the residence. The vehicle was later towed to the dealer, who determined that the high-voltage battery contactor needed to be replaced. The dealer performed the recall repair under NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V412000 (Electrical System); however, the failure persisted. The vehicle was not repaired and remained with the dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and two cases were filed. The failure mileage was 104,442.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, several unknown warning lights illuminated. The messages "Stop Safely Now", "Service Advancetrac", "Overdrive Off", and "Pre-Collision Indicator Off" were displayed. The contact pulled over and parked the vehicle. The vehicle failed to restart, and the 12-volt battery was drained. The vehicle was towed to the residence. The vehicle was later towed to the dealer, who determined that the high-voltage battery contactor needed to be replaced. The dealer performed the recall repair under NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V412000 (Electrical System); however, the failure persisted. The vehicle was not repaired and remained with the dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and two cases were filed. The failure mileage was 104,442.
I have a 2022 Mustang Mach-E GT and have now experienced two (2) High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVJB) failures. First failure was in July 2023 when the vehicle had approximately 12,000 miles. I received the stop safely now message. Vehicle codes displayed via the Ford app showed a High Voltage Battery Warning and Power train Malfunction / Reduced Power warnings. I have now received this same failure and warnings again. The car currently has 54,000 miles and I was just advised by my dealer that the HVJB has failed a second time. My concern is that the replacement voltage boxes are nothing more than a Band-aid for the problem and not a permanent solution. As I prepare to receive by 3rd HVJB, I feel this is nothing more than a temporary fix until I receive another Stop Safely Now message while operating my vehicle. Please look into the HVJB failure rate for these vehicles. I am in online two Mustang Mach-E owners groups and this issue is rampant among owners. I feel this issue requires outside attention as Ford has now had 4 years to solve this issue for early produced Mach Es. Yet the issue continues to exist. Thank you for your attention in the matter.
I have a 2022 Mustang Mach-E GT and have now experienced two (2) High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVJB) failures. First failure was in July 2023 when the vehicle had approximately 12,000 miles. I received the stop safely now message. Vehicle codes displayed via the Ford app showed a High Voltage Battery Warning and Power train Malfunction / Reduced Power warnings. I have now received this same failure and warnings again. The car currently has 54,000 miles and I was just advised by my dealer that the HVJB has failed a second time. My concern is that the replacement voltage boxes are nothing more than a Band-aid for the problem and not a permanent solution. As I prepare to receive by 3rd HVJB, I feel this is nothing more than a temporary fix until I receive another Stop Safely Now message while operating my vehicle. Please look into the HVJB failure rate for these vehicles. I am in online two Mustang Mach-E owners groups and this issue is rampant among owners. I feel this issue requires outside attention as Ford has now had 4 years to solve this issue for early produced Mach Es. Yet the issue continues to exist. Thank you for your attention in the matter.
My wife was driving on the parkway when her Mustang Mach-E started flashing multiple warning messages on the HUD. The vehicle suddenly died with no power. She was in a center lane of traffic in a 6-lane section. The vehicle did not let her put the car into neutral to push it out of the way. When they tried to get back into the car they found that it would not open and after she and the police officer who stopped searched Google and YouTube, they learned that there is no way to manually open the vehicle with no power. This was confirmed by the dealership.
My wife was driving on the parkway when her Mustang Mach-E started flashing multiple warning messages on the HUD. The vehicle suddenly died with no power. She was in a center lane of traffic in a 6-lane section. The vehicle did not let her put the car into neutral to push it out of the way. When they tried to get back into the car they found that it would not open and after she and the police officer who stopped searched Google and YouTube, they learned that there is no way to manually open the vehicle with no power. This was confirmed by the dealership.
The front camera has failed. The automatic emergency breaking, the adaptive cruise control, and normal cruise control do not work, at all. The camera began to fail within the first year of ownership but it would start to work shortly after. After about 1.5 years of ownership, there was a permanent sign of malfunction on the screen, making the above features inoperable.
The front camera has failed. The automatic emergency breaking, the adaptive cruise control, and normal cruise control do not work, at all. The camera began to fail within the first year of ownership but it would start to work shortly after. After about 1.5 years of ownership, there was a permanent sign of malfunction on the screen, making the above features inoperable.
The Adaptive Cruise Control indicated speed lags when user changes speed. The lag will fluctuate from non-existent to 4-5sec at times. It occurs at different speeds and for different changes (e.g., speeding up to 45mph or speeding down to 25mph.) It also occurs when changing speeds in different increments (e.g., one click up for 1mph increase or hold down for 5mph decrease.) The lag is only in the display and not the actual drivetrain, meaning that the selected speed in the Adaptive Control indicator is not relaying the selected speed even though the car itself is changing speed. This is a safety issue as you don't know whether the car has registered a speed increase or decrease for several seconds (which at higher speeds is certainly not safe.) There was an OTA related to the Instrument Control Panel sent earlier this summer that was successfully installed, IPC-25.7.46, however this may be a coincidence. After calling multiple times to Ford, including their OTA update team, their EV Technology Team, and a generic Customer Experience team, I was told to bring it into a dealership AND submit a complaint to NHTSA. The dealership identified modules that required updating but that did not fix the issue. Ford has NOT been helpful and their Customer Experience reps have been dismissive of the seriousness of this issue.
The Adaptive Cruise Control indicated speed lags when user changes speed. The lag will fluctuate from non-existent to 4-5sec at times. It occurs at different speeds and for different changes (e.g., speeding up to 45mph or speeding down to 25mph.) It also occurs when changing speeds in different increments (e.g., one click up for 1mph increase or hold down for 5mph decrease.) The lag is only in the display and not the actual drivetrain, meaning that the selected speed in the Adaptive Control indicator is not relaying the selected speed even though the car itself is changing speed. This is a safety issue as you don't know whether the car has registered a speed increase or decrease for several seconds (which at higher speeds is certainly not safe.) There was an OTA related to the Instrument Control Panel sent earlier this summer that was successfully installed, IPC-25.7.46, however this may be a coincidence. After calling multiple times to Ford, including their OTA update team, their EV Technology Team, and a generic Customer Experience team, I was told to bring it into a dealership AND submit a complaint to NHTSA. The dealership identified modules that required updating but that did not fix the issue. Ford has NOT been helpful and their Customer Experience reps have been dismissive of the seriousness of this issue.
The recall has no estimated repair date: the initial notification was June 16th. This has passed a reasonable amount of time, with no repair but a "we think we might fix it around the 3rd quarter of 2025" - definitely not satisfying the law. Tesla already had one death from entrapment post accident: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The recall has no estimated repair date: the initial notification was June 16th. This has passed a reasonable amount of time, with no repair but a "we think we might fix it around the 3rd quarter of 2025" - definitely not satisfying the law. Tesla already had one death from entrapment post accident: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact stated that while attempting to exit the vehicle, the doors automatically locked independently. The contact called AAA o assist with unlocking the vehicle to be able to exit the vehicle. The dealer was contacted and confirmed that there was no fix yet available. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and sent AAA to assist the contact. The failure mileage was unknown. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact stated that while attempting to exit the vehicle, the doors automatically locked independently. The contact called AAA o assist with unlocking the vehicle to be able to exit the vehicle. The dealer was contacted and confirmed that there was no fix yet available. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and sent AAA to assist the contact. The failure mileage was unknown. VIN tool confirms parts not available.
I was driving my car when all of a sudden it lost all acceleration and power, I was lucky that I wasn't on the highway anymore and was able to pull over safely on a side street while car was rolling still. Dealer said 12V battery fused, and I have been reading forums where this is a common issue.. In a normal ICE car when 12V battery dies while driving, car can still drive, in this case, it just stops and pops up a dozen errors about everything being broken.
I was driving my car when all of a sudden it lost all acceleration and power, I was lucky that I wasn't on the highway anymore and was able to pull over safely on a side street while car was rolling still. Dealer said 12V battery fused, and I have been reading forums where this is a common issue.. In a normal ICE car when 12V battery dies while driving, car can still drive, in this case, it just stops and pops up a dozen errors about everything being broken.
My 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E has experienced a complete failure of the front passenger door latch. The electronic latch (e-latch) button does not light up or respond, and the door remains fully open and cannot be latched or secured. This occurred without any damage or external cause. I’ve been informed that this issue requires full latch replacement at my expense, totaling over $760. I’m also aware of a pending recall (25S65) related to 12V discharge and door latch functionality, but I’ve been told my vehicle is not currently covered — even though the symptoms appear directly related. This is a safety-critical failure because the door cannot be secured while driving, creating a serious risk of passenger ejection in motion. This issue appears to be common among early Mach-E models and should be formally investigated.
My 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E has experienced a complete failure of the front passenger door latch. The electronic latch (e-latch) button does not light up or respond, and the door remains fully open and cannot be latched or secured. This occurred without any damage or external cause. I’ve been informed that this issue requires full latch replacement at my expense, totaling over $760. I’m also aware of a pending recall (25S65) related to 12V discharge and door latch functionality, but I’ve been told my vehicle is not currently covered — even though the symptoms appear directly related. This is a safety-critical failure because the door cannot be secured while driving, creating a serious risk of passenger ejection in motion. This issue appears to be common among early Mach-E models and should be formally investigated.
Showing top 50 of 121 complaints (sorted by severity, most recent first). Full records available via NHTSA ODI search.
What Owners Are Saying
"> Lscamp said: > > So you’re good with the roof flying off or the bumper falling off? Makes sense... > > > Click to expand... First NameJimJoinedSep 10, 2020Threads290Messages9,316Reaction score12,545LocationWayne, PAVehicles > ARK said: > > That sound bar is definitely not designed to take abuse from kids throwing food and drinks around, the dog jumping around, etc. Ford definitely went for style over family SUV indestructibility here. > > > Click to expand... Any children or animals (I sometimes have difficulties distinguishing between the two) soiling or damaging the interior of my vehicle will rapidly exit it - at speed. They should have been properly restrained and incapable of any motion while in the vehicle."
"Review and Feedback on FitCamX Dashcam Became the proud owner of Richtofen (2024 AWD Premium) last fall and am nothing but impressed so far. This is my first "new to me" vehicle in a long time, so of course I've been adding accessories and "upgrades" to personalize him and make him "mine." My Signifiant Other saw the FitCamX on my Christmas Wishlist and on Christmas morning I was pleasantly surprised to find it under the tree! Due the cold and some unforseen issues I just got around to installing it and thought I'd share my thoughts with the community! Here is the product page if you are not familiar with the product: **The Product** \- The dashcam itself is pretty basic. It is forward facing only, and does NOT have location/speed/GPS info/integration. What made it attractive to me is that once it is installed, it is pretty much invisible and looks like it is a factory feature! There is no hardware stuck to the window and no cables to route or take up a USB jack. There are trade-offs, but I prefer the clean look and appearance over the more advanced features. **Installation -** Installation was pretty straight forward. Scanning a QR code takes one to a manufacturer's video that walks the user through each step the installation process. Here is a summary of the main steps: 1. Removed the factory plastic cover around the rear view mirror using the plastic pry tool that comes in the packaging. (This made me nervous, but was easier that I expected) 2. Transfer the retaining clips from the factory plastic cover to the FitCamX plastic cover. 3. Unplug the rain sensor and install the included Y-connector cable to connect the FitCamX to the car's electrical power. 4. Route / tuck in the cables and re-attach the camera / plastic cover to the car. 5. Turn on the car and connect the dashcam's Wi-Fi to your phone to verify its operation. The intallation is not difficult and can be done by anyone with a little patience. Overall it will took about 20 minutes from start to finish. **Support** \-I did have a slight issue with the product. When I first installed the dashcam, it would not power on and all the troublshooting steps were unsuccessful. Tech Support is pretty much only available via email, but they are VERY responsive. I wrote them about the power issue on Sunday morning (non-business hours) and had a reply first thing Monday morning (first business day). They requested a couple of photos of the install, verified that everything looked right, and ended up sending out a new Y-Connector cable. I received the cable a couple days later, installed it, but had the same issue (no power). I emailed them again explaining the situation which indicated that the issue had to be in the camera itself, and the next day I had a tracking numbe"
"I have ~ 3,000 miles. Premium, ER battery, RWD. The 300 mile advertised range is in a perfect world. This is our 2nd EV, so we understood the variances in real world. During the cold snap .. we would only get ~230-250 miles and now that it's warming up .. we are back up to 270-280. It seems that Ford is being conservative to some degree in the car's internal range calculation (for good reason). When we get the to low end and think we will get home with only 20 mile left .. we will actually have ~35-50 miles. You can hit reset to delete your past driving ...I understand it uses the last few hundred mile to create you consumption profile. My wife can get 10-15 more miles per charge than I can as she is more diligent with the speed limits than I am. As FORD learns more we might get an update with the mile range.( I-Pace did after a year - they bumped it ~ 20 miles per charge). We leave in Texas in the country so we do a lot of 50-200 mile round trips. This car works perfect for my driving. We also have solar panels and a 50amp charge in the garage. I haven't tried a long trip, but when I have used the DC fast chargers (Walmart - Cracker Barrel) you can get to 80% #30· Apr 7, 2021"
"> buzznwood said: > > Most of the rattles you get with fords are due to bean counting on the interior, USA models also suffer a lot of decontenting over time (you only have to see the bits that go missing vs some euro versions of the same vehicle) add in the use of sub par plastics in some models (looking at you mustang) and in the lack of felt between possible rub points over time they can become a rattle trap . > > Most of the additional rub & creak points typically comes from the vast spread of trims you can get with a model so the dash ends up being a jigsaw of pieces to cater to all these trim levels adding far more contact points than would typically be necessary. > > The huge plus point for the mach-e is that this vast interior trim selection is not present pretty much all vehicles have the same base interior setup with the trim differences being at logical places no heated seats, steering etc and with the lack of physical buttons for a lot of features that jigsaw puzzle of differences is just not there so I suspect the interior should remain rattle free > > I got to sit in the mach-e during one of the road show visits last week, my overall impression of the interior was that is was solidly put together I gave the central console a good wobble test and gave the dash a good look over everything was nice and sturdy within minimal contact points so I expect it to remain creak free, of course only time will tell but seeing as most of my commute is over a large strip of concrete rubble that the state is trying to pass off as a freeway it probably won't take long to put that to the test lol. > > Overall quality wise it was up at the titanium level with soft touch front and rear, however for the price point it really should be at the viginale trim level as it is missing features that are present on cheaper models so ford gets a large demerit for that from me, not yet sat in a model Y but compared to the interior of a model 3 it was a step up, but I find the interior of quality of all teslas I have been in sub par. > > Until BEV's become truly mainstream you are going to be paying more than the equivalent ICE so unfortunately being in the early adopter club means comparing quality at similar price points to between BEV and ICE is going to typically leave the BEV of worse only long term ownership will reveal what interior cost cutting took place on the mach-e however based on first impressions it should hold up well. > > > Click to expand..."
"5 weeks in the shop (No diagnoisis) *Update now 11 weeks* Update 02/11/2025 In 2 days this will be 11 weeks in the shop. It has been over 3 weeks with no response from Ford engineering. The local tech has reached out to the field service engineer (FSE) Sergio 8 times in the last 3 weeks and the handful of responses were that they still have not heard back from engineering. About 3 weeks ago the tech recieved a "break out box" that is supposed to allow them to monitor all car systems and simotaniously detach one module at a time. This process proved inconclusive and there is still no diagnoises on what the problem is. I did ask for a printout of the work order from the dealership for my records. This did remind me that my car is in for 2 items that I indicated and 1 that the dealership found. CS : "Electrical system drain - service required" displayed CS : "Eye-Tracking/bluecruise not working" and the fun surprise 3. Coolant low in both resvoirs. At this point nothing has been diagnoised and zero progress has been made. I requested, with Dorene from Ford, to resubmit another buyback request on my behalf and to indicate that I'm looking for a buyback because it is under warranty and it can not be fixed. I doubt this will go anywhere but I'm grasping at straws at this point. Also spoke with the local Service Manager. He thinks it is a software issue and that Ford doesn't know how to fix it. I told him about the buyback request getting denied and then submitting another. He requested Dorene's e-mail and he is going to reach out to his regional ford contact, "who is many levels above the woman you spoke to" and see if he can help push for a buyback as well. I spoke with a lemon law attorney as well and they indicated that I do have a case and they could move forward but their firm would only be going after financial compensation and expectations were 3-5k. If I was looking for a buyback or starting a lawsuit to get more from Ford they could refer me to another firm that could help me with that. They did let me know that with everything they've been working on lately Ford is fighting extremely hard to not buy back any electric vehicles or Broncos. They told me that they really dug their heels in within the last 3-6 months and it seems like a high level policy decision within Ford. I'd be happy with any suggestions on how to move forward at this point. Ford is incompetent and dragging their heels in regards to my vehicle and I feel like it's leaving me no options. **End Update** UPDATE 01/09/2025. 6 weeks in the shop today. No progress has been made since my original post. Our vehicle is a 2022' Ford Mustang Mach E GT Performance Edition that was purchased used in April of 2024 with ~4k miles from a dealership in Ohio and we had it shipped to Florida. The vehicle currently only has ~10k miles on it. I got a call back from Dorene at Ford (corporate) and my buyback was denied for being out of lemon law guideines for the state of Ohio, w"
"Such a sad day So I’d like to present my very first photos with my 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select AWD. I want to say that I only had the vehicle for maybe 3 months. Here’s what happened: I got a call from the Ford dealership (local) that they found a Mach-E for me around the price I was looking to pay. The only thing was that they wanted to make sure I was ready to put a down payment on it immediately because they had to purchase it from another dealership. Once I gave my okay, the same day they purchased the vehicle was the same day I put in my down payment and signed the paperwork and drove off with the vehicle. I wish I knew then what I only know just more recently, which was that the vehicle itself was a lemon. I wish on that day I had immediately asked for the CarFax and had made sure everything was good. The first week I had it, I didn’t really notice anything wrong with it. I was loving it and driving around as much as I could. Then about a month in I started to notice some electrical issues and connection issues with my devices. I took it to the dealership and they had it for a moment but they ultimately just updated it and said it should be good. The other thing was that it was suppose to have the Ford Blue Cruise on it as it’s what they told me was added to it. The fact is, it didn’t, and when they tried to manually put in the software (because the vehicle already had the hardware for it), it just wasn’t sticking. A few weeks later, I go to put something in the back of the car and I notice an earthy smell. I lift up the platform in the back and discover MOLD growing. To make matters worse, I got an email with the CarFax. When I opened it, let me tell you how absolutely shocked I was to find out that the vehicle had actually been in a major front end collision before where ALL airbags deployed. I take this information and everything to the dealership who end up actually shocked and inform me that the dealer they bought it from never disclosed any of this information. Now I did do my part in contacting multiple lawyers, however, the cheapest one I found wanted a $5k retainer (which I didn’t have). I decided to just work with the dealership as they are(were) a reputable dealership. They end up taking the vehicle in promising to fix everything that’s either broken or needs to be repaired. Three weeks later, they inform me that they just want to buy back the vehicle the exact price I paid for it and give me my down payment back because they found out that because of the prior accident it had, it was never properly fixed and so any time it rained or if I took it to a car wash, it was getting inside the inside of the car (behind panels) and because of that noticed about $10k worth of damage including corroded electrical (explains the electrical issues). I ended up taking them up on their offer and they paid off my vehicle loan plus interest and gave me back my down payment (well, most of it). I’m so sad y’all,"
"Notified by dealer in the last week of April that the APIM arrived. Left car while on vacation. Two attempts to install, one by dealer service alone, and the second by them with a different procedure recommended by a consulting Ford Tech. Advised on May 4 that the second attempt also failed to restore OTA capability, and that the Ford Tech had “escalated” the issue within Ford. No further word from Ford since then — Dealer service department said the Ford Tech has gone incommunicado. Dealer suggested I could appeal to Ford Customer Svc — done yesterday. Car has been with dealer service department for one month."
""As you're aware, I picked up my vehicle on Friday as you weren't able to repair it due to servers being down. I'm not sure what exactly you mean with the servers. However, this morning I got a customer service notice from Ford that seems to identify the problem I've been trying to fix since March. The letter reads "Customer Satisfaction Program 22B08" and identifies an internal error in SYNC or Telematics Control Unit module software which will prevent the receipt of updates. Forums online say that TSB 22-2150 will fix the issue. Let me know if there is anything I can do to get it done there, or if I would be better served seeing if another dealership can perform the update?" "EVEN WITH THIS PROGRAM YOU ARE SPEAKING OF IT STILL WILL NOT LET US RECONIZED THE THERE IS A FLASH INSERT. STILL WORKING ON IT Wish that I found this post several months ago, as my car is suffering the same condition. Sometime during past recall or ”customer satisfaction program” work on software systems, the car lost the OTA Update capability. The last attempt of the Service Department to fix this was in early December — a 3 day drop-off that concluded with the explanation that the car needed a new APIM. I was told that one was on order and in-stock at Ford; and would probably arrive in a week. Hearing nothing, I left a message with Service after New Years Day. I heard back this week, a text update that Ford changed the part status to out of stock, with no promised date."
Showing 8 of 72 owner excerpts (sorted by sentiment strength)